B
Baptistrw
Guest
is this about communion or the catholic church?
Both I suppose.
is this about communion or the catholic church?
He obviously wasn't teaching his disciples cannibalism. If taking it in its literal sense it makes no sense and doesn't agree with the rest of scripture, it needs to be re-examined. This particular passage makes no sense if it is taken at face value, so it needs a different interpretation.
Define "is a means of God's grace."
Catholicism can be considered as a false religion, because...
They consider Mary the mediator between Jesus and Human kind. Well obviously, that's is not found in the bible. They believed in 'Purgatories' (a situation of temporary suffering or torment). Which is apparently, not in the bible. And another thing, they added books in the bible.
They actually didn't add books to the Bible.
In time, the church had books added into it. No one really knows how it happened.. but it did. When they found out that they hadn't been in the original scriptures, many denominations took them out again. Catholics didn't. There's a big long story about this, I'm not going to get into..but they didn't one day decide to add books to the Bible.
why would Jesus, sent to free the world and gather people for God, allow so many people to just leave because of a misunderstanding?
It's still not answered..
When Protestants of the reformation traditions use the term "means of grace" they mean those things God has specifically established which he provides grace through.
These are God given rites that we believe help to sustain and empower the Christian life. I'd say baptism, communion and confession are sacraments, but some exclude confession.
They actually didn't add books to the Bible.
In time, the church had books added into it. No one really knows how it happened.. but it did. When they found out that they hadn't been in the original scriptures, many denominations took them out again. Catholics didn't. There's a big long story about this, I'm not going to get into..but they didn't one day decide to add books to the Bible.
Hmm, i see, cool. But why won't they remove those? Knowing what the scriptures say about it.
Catholics add the non canonical apocrypha to their editions of the Bible. And they view these books as authoritative. So yes they do add books to the Bible.
There's nothing in the scripture that said anything against them? This is like.. before the New Testament times. They didn't remove them, probably because they figured if they were in there, they were in there for a reason. I'm not really sure.
yeah but why wont they remove those?? revelation is existing now. that was my point.Revelation didn't exist before the New Testament![]()
The catholics came on the scene about the 4 th century and immidiately started perverting the truth. They got the influence of the cesar so they became the power in Rome. you see Satan tried to kill off the christians and destroy them from with out, when he saw that would not work he decided to destroy the church from with in, So he created catholicism. It almost worked, but God always has a remnant as He does today. The Catholics created many false doctrines including the Trinity most of the Catholic dogmas were dismiss as false during the protestant reformation yet some such as the trinity they held on to as to why I am not quite sure.