Was Mary Sinless?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In traditional Christian denomenations, the foundation of most theology and doctrines is the Pauline epistles, some of them have pagan origins; in messianic Judaism however, the foundation is the Torah, the first five books, it's like the blueprint of a building, the word "torah" primarily means "teaching" or "instruction", not "law" or "rule"; the gospels and Acts are the fulfilment of the Torah, and the Pauline epistles are essentially a Q&A, his responses to all kinds issues and confusions arising in the early churches. That, I'm afraid, is our inreconcilable difference.
" ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." 11 Tim 3:16-17. Either you think Paul wasn't a man of God and his writings are not inspired by God, so they are NOT scripture, or that the Holy Spirit gave him pagan laced writings. Either one or the other. You must remember Paul spent three years being downloaded to by the Holy Spirit, not the church leaders " But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mothers womb, and called me by His grace. TO REVEAL HIS SON in me, that I might preach Him among the heathen; IMMEDIATELY I CONFERRED NOT WITH FLESH AND BLOOD: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. Then AFTER THREE YEARS I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days." Gal 1 15-18 " As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the OTHER SCRIPTURES, unto their destruction." 11 Peter 3:16. Peter, who was a messianic Jew, includes Paul's epistles as God inspired scripture, don't you? I sense, I might be wrong, a slight distain for the church from your writings. Yes, Paul, in some of his writings, was answering concerns and questions raised to him and although we don't have the questions, we can discern the questions by the answers he gave, and by them he was setting the church in order. " Behold, I (God) will do a NEW THING; now it shall spring forth; SHALL YE NOT KNOW IT?...." Isaiah 43:19. You can't put new wine in old wineskins.
 
You've taken the imagery of the parable, or not, of the rich man literally but then symbolize Abraham's bosom. Why don't you have to take that so word for word?
I don't believe that it is a parable because usually, in a parable, names are not given. I wrote " or not " because I don't want to create a rabbit hole for someone to pounce on, that's not the point. The point being that the rich man was in hell and he thirsted, remembered, talked, saw, etc., etc. He still had his mind, which is part of his soul, and he has it for eternity.
 
" ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." 11 Tim 3:16-17. Either you think Paul wasn't a man of God and his writings are not inspired by God, so they are NOT scripture, or that the Holy Spirit gave him pagan laced writings. Either one or the other. You must remember Paul spent three years being downloaded to by the Holy Spirit, not the church leaders " But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mothers womb, and called me by His grace. TO REVEAL HIS SON in me, that I might preach Him among the heathen; IMMEDIATELY I CONFERRED NOT WITH FLESH AND BLOOD: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. Then AFTER THREE YEARS I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days." Gal 1 15-18 " As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the OTHER SCRIPTURES, unto their destruction." 11 Peter 3:16. Peter, who was a messianic Jew, includes Paul's epistles as God inspired scripture, don't you? I sense, I might be wrong, a slight distain for the church from your writings. Yes, Paul, in some of his writings, was answering concerns and questions raised to him and although we don't have the questions, we can discern the questions by the answers he gave, and by them he was setting the church in order. " Behold, I (God) will do a NEW THING; now it shall spring forth; SHALL YE NOT KNOW IT?...." Isaiah 43:19. You can't put new wine in old wineskins.
After I posted this I read you response to David Lamb and found that your problem is not with Paul but with some church doctrines which have pagan beginnings, to which I agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidLamb
You can't put new wine in old wineskins.
You misunderstood, forgive my poor wording, but what I intended to express is that many teachings, doctrines and traditions from most Christian denominations have pagan origins, such as Virgin Mary worship suggested in the OP, or transubstantiation, purgatory, preterism (i.e. Christ's kingdom is already established, ruled by him in heaven through the pope on earth) etc., not Paul's epistles. Paul would have written epistles to rebuke such pagan rooted practices, had he lived in the medieval age. In these cases, it was not new wine, but either wine that's watered down, or other drinks, or even poison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bytheblood
I don't believe that it is a parable because usually, in a parable, names are not given. I wrote " or not " because I don't want to create a rabbit hole for someone to pounce on, that's not the point. The point being that the rich man was in hell and he thirsted, remembered, talked, saw, etc., etc. He still had his mind, which is part of his soul, and he has it for eternity.
In what state do you regard the "souls under the altar" in revelation to be in while they are asking God, "How long?"
 
Did you check the Greek? I showed you the Greek but I don't think you even looked, did you?

You don't strike me as someone serious when it comes to studying the word of God.

He is only serious about looking to appear to be serious...

Problem is...
He does not know where to find teaching which would show him the Greek explained to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sawdust
He is only serious about looking to appear to be serious...

Problem is...
He does not know where to find teaching which would show him the Greek explained to us.
I'm wondering, who " explained " the Greek to you and Sawdust? I guess you both consider it foolish of me to even think that I could ever attain to the lofty, highly informed positions that you find yourselves in. " But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound( those who THINK they are) the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which (THINK they) are mighty; and the base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are." 1 Corinthians 1:27-28 P.S. Genez, I have a computer(surprise!), I know how to input questions, find biblical helps, etc., etc. and am privy to most any information that you are. I chose that which, since I am a spirit who possesses a soul, agrees with my spirit. You guys, on the other hand, who claim to be souls who have a spirit, agree with what you souls agree. **** Parentheses and it's contents mine :-))
 
I'm wondering, who " explained " the Greek to you and Sawdust? I guess you both consider it foolish of me to even think that I could ever attain to the lofty, highly informed positions that you find yourselves in. " But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound( those who THINK they are) the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which (THINK they) are mighty; and the base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are." 1 Corinthians 1:27-28 P.S. Genez, I have a computer(surprise!), I know how to input questions, find biblical helps, etc., etc. and am privy to most any information that you are. I chose that which, since I am a spirit who possesses a soul, agrees with my spirit. You guys, on the other hand, who claim to be souls who have a spirit, agree with what you souls agree. **** Parentheses and it's contents mine :-))
A scholar who studied Greek and Hebrew for most of his life.

Knowing how to input questions and knowing how to learn from the answers are not the same.

ἄνωθεν (anōthen) — 13 Occurrences

Not once in any of those occurrences is it used in the sense of a do-over.

You have ignored flesh only gives birth to flesh. You have ignored only the Spirit gives birth to spirit Jn.3:6 and that it is only God who gave the spirit Ecc.12:7. Then you claim being foolish and weak and if it is some badge of honour to justify your ignorance. Simply unbelievable the lengths some will go.

As I said before, come back when you're serious and can look deeper than your own nose.

grace and peace
 
I'm wondering, who " explained " the Greek to you and Sawdust? I guess you both consider it foolish of me to even think that I could ever attain to the lofty, highly informed positions that you find yourselves in. "
It is not lofty and high.
You can have it yourself.

And, if you wish?
No money would be asked for.

God provides in grace and righteousness.
 
I've clearly showed you that these seven letters are NOT for instruction, they're judgements and warnings. Also, in a book of prophecies, these seven letters hold prophetic value, I personally believe they're both seven types of churches and seven epoches in the church history, each angel a guardian angel that oversees each church. Yes, I asked questions only God can answer, and He did answer.
Warnings aren't instructions?