Was sex Adam and Eve part of the curse

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Now your mocking me. Well, It is clear the fruit of the spirit your produce is not in accordance with scripture as being of Christ.
I will pray for you but I must also ignore you.
I wasn't mocking you, I was mocking "Grid 3" who did the thinking and posting for you.
 
Does the Law's later prohibition tell us what was forbidden in Abraham's day, or does it tell us what became forbidden under the Mosaic covenant?
That is a good question, is Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Scripture records several close-family marriages early in Genesis that would later be prohibited under the Law.
For example?
So the real issue is not whether Sarah was Abraham's biological half-sister.
Actually that is the real issue. But she was his sister. 😊
Genesis 20:12 seems quite clear that she was.
Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. John 7:24
The question is whether the standards given in Leviticus 18 were already in force in Abraham's day or were revealed later through Moses?
The LORD told Abimelech to restore to Abraham his wife; for he is a prophet.
 
That is a good question, is Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

For example?

Actually that is the real issue. But she was his sister. 😊

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. John 7:24

The LORD told Abimelech to restore to Abraham his wife; for he is a prophet.
That's an interesting connection, If Abraham's marriage to Sarah was sinful, why does God repeatedly reaffirm His covenant with Abraham while Sarah remains his wife?
You're right that Hebrews says: "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever." (Heb. 13:8)
But does that mean every command given under Moses was already binding in exactly the same way before Sinai?

For example, where do we find a prohibition against marrying a half-sister before Leviticus 18?

As for examples, Abraham and Sarah would be one if we understand Genesis 20:12 literally.
The sons of Adam and Eve would also have had to marry close relatives for mankind to multiply.

The question that keeps coming back to me is: What does the text itself say God thought about Abraham's marriage?
In Genesis 20, God tells Abimelech: "restore the man his wife; for he is a prophet" (Gen. 20:7).
Notice God doesn't say: "Return this unlawful woman."
He calls Sarah Abraham's wife and commands her restoration.

So I think the real question is not whether Sarah was Abraham's sister.
Genesis 20:12 plainly says she was his half-sister.

The question is: Does Scripture ever condemn Abraham's marriage on that basis?
That's the specific text I'd be looking for.
Jesus often brought people back to what is actually written rather than what we assume must follow from it.
"What is written? How readest thou?" seems like the right question here.
 
The question wasn't whether Abraham had an incestuous but why do you believe he had an incestuous relationship?
"Incestuous relationship" is your words, your accusation, not mine. The Lord affirmed Abraham that Sarah, as his wife and his half sister, will bear him a son, who will be his legitimate heir, who are you to call that an incestuous relationship?
 
I know neither Grid 3 nor whatever disability you claim you have is a legitimate excuse to speculate that the disciples had kids.
Nor is your blessed physical condition a legitimate excuse to speculate that the disciples didn't have kids.
 
Nor is your blessed physical condition a legitimate excuse to speculate that the disciples didn't have kids.
Again, the burden of proof is on you. The Phillip in Acts 21 is not the same one in Acts 8.