Watching "Un-christian Porn" - protect your heart
- Thread starter Grace777x70
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G
Gr8grace
Guest
There are many who never get saved. Not all will be saved............He desires it though.
G
Gr8grace
Guest
Show us where he was NOT.
Christ said that there is none good. Only one.
Why would he use an unbeliever to show good works, if NONE are good?
There is a funny situation here. grace8 and grace7x77 to say the good samaritan is good means they are universalists, or evil and they look stupid. It is little wonder I had to assume they said the good samaritan was evil because they did not want to say that, and equally they did not want to say he was good.
Now I am sorry you cannot take my assumption as not a valid conclusion of the argument, but it has just be recreated here.
Now if you want me to say I was being a false witness, that is your opinion, but this was the question I asked, which they refused to answer.
Another simple question was I was called missled to say hyper grace was linked to wof and prosperity.
I then realised Joseph Prince is wof, prosperity and hyper-grace. Again they refused to answer because it means they are lying and contradicting themselves. It is hard to deal with double minded men like this when I am just being straight and honest. If you conclude I am not, well that is fine by me, because I can do more than this.
No man is 'good' (whatever you mean by that), but that doesn't mean that man can't do good works.
So here is my point. You can't lump everyone together. You have to talk to a man separately, to determine what He believes. You can't take what one man says (or might have said, because we haven't been shown where he did) and just assume all of the men in the room all think the exact same thing. This is lazy, Peter. It shows a desire to not engage with another person and spend time getting to know their mind. You don't make hot dogs for everyone and put catsup on all of them just because you know one man likes catsup. You take the time to ask who likes catsup and who doesn't. Just because they both like onions does not mean they both like catsup. You can't assume they are the same on all things just because they might be the same in one. Why the hurried running around trying to lasso everyone into little groups to condemn?
Now, I will say this...men who put sweet relish instead of dill on their dogs are just wrong, as are men who wear pants on their heads.
Now, I will say this...men who put sweet relish instead of dill on their dogs are just wrong, as are men who wear pants on their heads.
Good grief. The good samaritan is called good because he did a good deed. He is not called good because he is religious or following God. His is a samaritan so he is not following Yaweh and therefore rejected. Jesus chose him as a parable that goodness is innate in the action not the man. Now twisting the story your way is a unique angle but if your are happy with this, it is your funeral.
G
Gr8grace
Guest
You are not very good at theology my friend. I am not personalising theology, I am saying this is the position that was taken. Who takes it does not matter to me, but the fact that it is being taken.
Theology matters, and it first has to be established. Obviously that is not of interest to you, but that is your problem not mine.
Once established people then assent to it or not.
Interestingly Grace8 is proposing an idea not agreed with by a lot of hyper-gracers. What I would put forward is the weakness of this argument is universalism. If you want to argue with that, then fine.
I am not going to change my approach, because these points are not neutral or innocent. It is up to you to decide where you stand. You obviously dislike this robustness of challenging people, but that is what happens when you change salvation and righteousness, and preach heresy.
Well...sydlit.....he is going to be the one to spawn a new movement called " The hyper-pants " movement..everyone's doing it..don't cha know?...even women are being completely lawless and wearing those "pants"..( albeit not on their heads like you know who..) ..it's a sign of the last days!!!
G
Gr8grace
Guest
The Jews didn't believe Samaritans followed God. Not God.
A Samaritan is a "half breed." not an "unbeliever." they were half Jewish and half gentile. It is not a "word" for unbeliever.
The Jews hated them, not God.
It is being contrary to ask to be pointed to the thread where everyone all agreed and stated that the good Samaritan did an evil deed...? I think it is being contrary to state it as fact and then say you can't be bothered to give the name of the thread...
G
Gr8grace
Guest
G
Gr8grace
Guest
We should get people to prove what they say....anybody can cry "fowl" and that someone said something..usually with a twist on it....that's why people ask to "show" what you mean..
...I could say that Mickey Mouse was going to be in heaven...and when confronted with..show me that..I could say..you are being "contray"..
..I say..show me where it says the Mouse gets in!
...I could say that Mickey Mouse was going to be in heaven...and when confronted with..show me that..I could say..you are being "contray"..
..I say..show me where it says the Mouse gets in!
Yes, you are being contrary. If you really want to know what they believe, all it takes is to ask the parties involved. Simple.
G
Gr8grace
Guest
Everybody is whining about "hyper" this and "hyper" that. It is the SAME old thing, just different terminology.
Works for salvation or grace for salvation.
I like you get out of jail free card. Sin is all washed away but deeds are separate and the good samaritan is really a jew or a christian? Now people have to decide whether the idea of Jesus choosing an example of a man being good from an enemy of the Jews was because he really wanted to say a righteous God fearing man was the only one who truly loved the beaten up man.
It does not add up. But then neither does you theology. Sin is forgiven for the whole world but people are sent to hell for doing good but in the wrong way. Now that is really just!!!!!
A mass murderer is forgiven for their murders but because they did good things for the wrong motives that really deserves torture for all eternity, really really roast them guys, they are such horrible evil do gooders. Nooooooooooooo
That is just nutttttttttttttttttttts
Hey StunnedByGrace likes this so it must be okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk