Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret things belong unto the Lord our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.
The Old Testament is what they had at the time . . . but they refused the word of God - they put it from themselves and judged themselves unworthy of everlasting life . . .
Okay.The word "but" that you underlined is in italics in KJV meaning the transcribers added the word thatElin said:No, the NT contrasts the law and grace, it does not identify the law with grace.
"For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ." (Jn 1:17)
All attempts to identify grace with the law are unbiblical.
was not in original language
hmm...i'm not understanding the controversy.
it seems pretty clear Paul explains it himself.
Eph 3:3-5
the mystery spoken of
Eph 3:6 the mystery explained/described
to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel
didn't the Jews first receive the oracles of God (OT)
and the Gospel?
Previously addressed.I don't either. It seems to be all about this definition in the Strong's concordance that Elin called pagan. Click this Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results and then type in 3466 in the 2nd box in Greek.
First let me say that the Jews righteousness came by the Law and their obedience to that law - "And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the LORD our God, as he hath commanded us. And no one has been able to do all and observe all the commandments beside Christ. Our righteousness is in and through Jesus Christ death and resurrection. To tell you the truth I am afraid to answer this because I feel that this is going to turn into a LAW thing . . . . just a round about way to get there.So they weren't abiding by God's perfect word. Right? They didn't have the heart nor the desire to understand.
John 5:44-47
44 How can ye believe , which receive honour one of another , and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?
45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust .
46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
hmm...i'm not understanding the controversy.
it seems pretty clear Paul explains it himself.
Eph 3:3-5
the mystery spoken of
Eph 3:6 the mystery explained/described
to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel
didn't the Jews first receive the oracles of God (OT)
and the Gospel?
I don't either. It seems to be all about this definition in the Strong's c
Originally Posted by just-me![]()
![]()
I don't either. It seems to be all about this definition in the Strong's concordance that Elin called pagan. Click this Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results and then type in 3466 in the 2nd box in Greek.oncordance that Elin called pagan. Click this Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results and then type in 3466 in the 2nd box in Greek.
Remember what I wrote to you in this post?
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/100117-what-not-where-bosom-abraham.html#post1709884
Previously addressed.
You have chosen the pagan usage of the word, rather than the NT usage of the word.
Not understanding the "rites" of the Jews is a major misunderstanding that needs clearing before we can go on if by rites you mean the physical things God gave the Jews to do to show them the spiritual. When the Jews demanded that the gentiles do these physical things like circumcision with a knife, they were in error. After Christ, we are told they are not necessary. Besides, if they were done legalistically as if the physical was enough without spiritual involvement it never was the right way to do them. You can see this when the Jews of Smyma said they were Jews based on the physical circumcision rather than the spiritual one. Paul says we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, now.That isn't what Paul is saying . . . Were the religious rites of the Jew kept secret since the world began and kept hid from ages and from generations but NOW is made manifest?
Correct BUT THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE REVEALED - THE mystery, "fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ" was not revealed until Paul received it from Jesus Christ.Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret things belong unto the Lord our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.
I don't either. It seems to be all about this definition in the Strong's concordance that Elin called pagan. Click this Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results and then type in 3466 in the 2nd box in Greek.
Remember what I wrote to you in this post?
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/100117-what-not-where-bosom-abraham.html#post1709884
Judah? The Abrahamic Covenant first given to Abraham then to Isaac then to Jacob and his seed.Why did you like it as I did?
I'll also respond this way. Judah wasn't the only tribe that the promise was given to. Jew is short for that one particular tribe. So again I ask, "what did the Jew receive before the Gentiles i.e. Greeks?" I will add. What commemorated this promise?
oh dear! *shame faced*
i missed that one.
shall i respond to it here, or there?
btw...i think you're not using the correct definition,
if you want to fit the text you present.
it seems to me Paul is presenting the mystery as Jews and Gentiles,
one man in Christ according to the Gospel.
but i still love you.
oh dear! *shame faced*
i missed that one.
shall i respond to it here, or there?
btw...i think you're not using the correct definition,
if you want to fit the text you present.
it seems to me Paul is presenting the mystery as Jews and Gentiles,
one man in Christ according to the Gospel.
but i still love you.
I gave you definitions from four scholarly Greek lexicons, all I got in return was ....crickets. It's hard to take this thread seriously when a preconceived conclusion is touted at all costs.I don't either. It seems to be all about this definition in the Strong's concordance that Elin called pagan. Click this Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results and then type in 3466 in the 2nd box in Greek.
Remember what I wrote to you in this post?
http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/100117-what-not-where-bosom-abraham.html#post1709884
I gave you definitions from four scholarly Greek lexicons, all I got in return was ....crickets. It's hard to take this thread seriously when a preconceived conclusion is touted at all costs.
The very first thing was the Promises given to Abraham reconfirmed to Jacob.
I gave you definitions from four scholarly Greek lexicons, all I got in return was ....crickets. It's hard to take this thread seriously when a preconceived conclusion is touted at all costs.
There was 3,000 years of people living and dying before Christ was crucified. We have scripture, in fact 78% of our scripture is devoted to those times, there must have been millions of lives of people who lived and died. Much of what is told to us of those times talks of blood and atonement. Paul did not start at the beginning of the world, God created the world. Yet you are saying the promise in Christ was not revealed until Paul? In the gospels it speaks of those people alive in Christ. Before, they had been asleep with Abraham, but alive. Is this not so?Correct BUT THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE REVEALED - THE mystery, "fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ" was not revealed until Paul received it from Jesus Christ.
And what was the point that contributed to the OP? Were these 4 definitions you gave something that the Jews received first and then to the Gentiles later?