remain in the dark then.
Okay, believe I will. Beats the alternative.
remain in the dark then.
They will challenge your whole (traditional) thinking on that. They address every point. It's best to just watch the first video titled "Shavuot or Pentecost". It's a home run that Pentecost did NOT happen on Shavuot.
Thank you Sister for at least watching some of the video. You are being a Berean and testing all Scripture unlike others in this thread who shut it down immediately. I urge you to watch the first video from 25:30 on to the end. Totally eye opening.Hi Radius, I did watch a little more of the video and I see where he's coming from now. It's possible he is correct about the original Pentecost happening on the Feast of New Wine, I wasn't there so I wouldn't bet my salvation on it lol but he might be right. I did always find it a bit odd to have "New Wine" still available 10 months after the grape harvest, but I figured it might not be considered "old" until the new harvest begins in July/August. So yeah, maybe.....though I still feel like the text indicates that some type of Jewish pilgrimage festival was occurring at that time..... but who knows, could have been a political event instead.
Regarding meshing all that with the timing of the Rapture......that's something I stay away from. I don't think we're meant to know too exactly when that will happen. Even Jesus didn't know the exact timing, at least not while He was on Earth. And if I tried I could probably come up with a symbolic reason for Him to come back on ANY of the Jewish feast days (It will be during the feast of tabernacles, because Jesus said He was going to prepare a place for us in His Father's house! And also because Peter referred to our earthly bodies as "tents"! Wait, nooooo....it will be during the festival of lights, because he said to keep out lamps full of oil! Oh wait I know.....it will be during Shavuot, the end of the harvest.......Jesus spoke of His followers as good grain to be harvested and taken to the storehouse, which is what you do at the end of the harvest!..........etc, etc......etc.
However, if you feel that type of study is beneficial for you then I understand, we are all different and drawn to different things and there is nothing wrong with that.I find that sort of thing interesting but not necessarily helpful on a practical level, but that's how most farmers are lol
![]()
"At pentecost the new wine symbolizes the infilling of the Holy Spirit".At pentecost the new wine symbolizes the infilling of the Holy Spirit ---Tongues of fire -----where the Disciples spoke in other languages to Preach the Gospel ---cast out demons ------etc
Interesting reads -----on New Wine
New Wine: What is the Prophetic Meaning of New Wine?
By Helen Calder
https://www.enlivenpublishing.com/2018/03/08/what-is-the-prophetic-meaning-of-new-wine/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.bibletools.org/index.cf...cgg/ID/19230/New-Wine-as-Gods-Holy-Spirit.htm
What the Bible says about New Wine as God's Holy Spirit
(From Forerunner Commentary)
Luke 5:37-38
The Bible uses wine in a wide variety of ways.
It can represent a drug or a blessing. It can be a symbol of debauchery or of abundance. Wine was part of the drink offering, symbolizing being poured out in service. It was part of Melchizedek's blessing on Abraham, and 2,000 years later, Jesus uses it in the Passover as the blood of the New Covenant. Psalm 75 shows a cup of wine of God's wrath, and Revelation 18 depicts a cup in the hand of Mystery Babylon, representing its intoxicating culture and the spirit of the times.
Obviously, not all of those meanings are in view here, but when we link the new wine with Jesus being "taken away" (verse 35), it coincides with the Passover cup, representing Christ's blood and the New Covenant. When we add the fact that the Holy Spirit could not be given until Jesus had gone away, then the new wine entails more than just forgiveness, but also suggests God's Spirit—His love, power, and sound-mindedness (II Timothy 1:7).
In the example, the new wine is expansive. The fermentation process produces a great deal of pressure. An old and brittle wineskin will not be able to withstand the increasing stress, and it will burst.
The wineskin is a type of vessel. Throughout Scripture, vessels are symbols for people. For Christians, there is an “old man” and a “new man.” The old man represents the life we had before conversion, and the new man, the new vessel, is the life that comes because of conversion. But if we take the expansive and dynamic new wine, and we attempt to put that into the old life, we can be sure that we will have a disaster on our hands.
Our old lives, our old ways, are entirely incompatible with the new wine.
The new wine requires change, expansion, and steady improvement, while in the old life, there was no real desire or ability to change.
Remember, the new wine is tied to the blood of Passover, the New Covenant, the receipt of God's Spirit, and the spiritual result that will be produced by those powerful factors. Trying to cram all that into a person who is unwilling to change will invariably result in his coming apart at the seams. The precious new wine is spilled on the ground and dreadfully wasted.
David C. Grabbe
Clothing, Wineskins, and Wine
Related Topics: New Man | New Wine | New Wine as God's Holy Spirit | Old Man
Luke 5:39
On the physical level, a finely aged wine is obviously preferable to a new wine. One year at the Feast of Tabernacles, I had the rare opportunity to sample a Bordeaux bottled in the late 1970s or early 80s. Suffice it to say that the wine's depth and complexity of flavors would put to profound shame anything bottled recently.
Curiously, though, in this parable, the new wine is the one that is to be preferred! This may seem incongruous at first, until we remember what these things represent.
The new wine of Christ's sacrifice, of the New Covenant, and of God's Spirit being poured out on us is infinitely more valuable than anything before conversion.
Whether the old wine represents physical abundance or the headiness of what Babylon entices us with constantly, nothing can be compared to the new wine—if we have God's Spirit.
However, because we are still human, and the old man still remains in us to some degree, at times the old wine seems better. The old wine seems more gratifying to the senses.
Before conversion, we certainly had no interest in this new wine because the old wine suited us just fine, even if it was making us miserable. Even after conversion, we sometimes reach for the old wine.
When we are under that influence, we do not find the new wine appealing because we are hooked on the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life (I John 2:16).
It requires spiritual sobriety to recognize the true blessing of the new wine, but we cannot do that easily—if at all—when the old wine is on our palate. It is only in abstaining from the old wine that we can truly appreciate the uniqueness and superiority of the new.
David C. Grabbe
Clothing, Wineskins, and Wine
You are being a Berean and testing all Scripture unlike others in this thread who shut it down immediately.
I don't know why you're still here then?You may not realize it, but I am a Berean. I've lived long enough to know that not every new idea that comes down the pike is important; and it doesn't take me long to understand what is important and what isn't. Maybe it's important to you and that's okay. I'm not trying to shut down anything; carry on and have a good discussion.
I don't know why you're still here then?
You are already part of the discussion and one of the ones who reject new knowledge. You will be brought up if need be.I'm here to correct your misrepresentation of me (I assume you include me among those you say just want to shut you down). Carry on your discussion and leave me out of it and I'll leave you alone, promise.
You are already part of the discussion and one of the ones who reject new knowledge. You will be brought up if need be.
It doesn't make me feel better. But I thought iron sharpening iron was what Christians should do. Now, are you iron?Ya know what, I've seen your ilk a thousand times in this forum. So if denigrating me for not accepting your "new knowledge" makes you feel better about yourself go right ahead, you have my blessing. No hard feelings.
waiting for a rebuttal for the points made in the video....i'll be long gone before that happens though, I already know it.Gnosticism for fun and prophet.
Doesn't it seem more weird that God would choose First Fruits to pour out His Spirit in the upper room? Makes no sense to me.seeing that God gave 7 feasts in the Law and that He chose His crucifixion and resurrection to be on these days, it seems immediately unlikely that He would choose a day that comes from human tradition rather than one of His own appointed times to fulfill His own prophecy with the giving of His Spirit.
it also seems very unlikely that there would be a 2,000 year old tradition in the church - which was almost entirely Jewish in the beginning - that Acts 2 took place on Shavuot if it wasn't so.
Doesn't it seem more weird that God would choose First Fruits to pour out His Spirit in the upper room? Makes no sense to me.
Shavuot is all about the first of the wheat. And given the description in Leviticus 23:15-21 it is all about presentations and offerings to God: "Wave two loaves...Wave the two lambs....burnt offering....drink offerings...sacrificial goat and two lambs as a sin and fellowship offering.... Sorry, it makes more sense that when Jesus ascended on that day, He ascended to the Father as the First Fruits offering fulfilling all these foreshadowed rituals.
Traditional Pentecost has absolutely nothing to do with First Fruits if you think about it, on the other hand, Jesus ascending to the Father 100% does.
Shavuot is the giving of the Torah at Sinai, and has a number of parallels to Acts 2
I was hoping someone had a desire to discuss these things? Anyone?
[who's saying this?]Doesn't it seem more weird that God would choose First Fruits to pour out His Spirit in the upper room? Makes no sense to me.
[the video-maker didn't say this... he said (I think) that Jesus ascended on Firstfruit (Jesus' Resurrection Day), and then 50 days later was "G399 - offered up [carried up]" per Lk24:51, not "ascended" (his point being: not 10 days prior to Shavuot); but he also makes the point (with which I mostly agree) that He "ascended" ON FIRSTFRUIT (His Resurrection Day)--I think he was saying this (I just disagree that He also took the Matt27:52-53 saints with Him that day, Lev23:10-14 / 1Cor15:20)]Shavuot is all about the first of the wheat. And given the description in Leviticus 23:15-21 it is all about presentations and offerings to God: "Wave two loaves...Wave the two lambs....burnt offering....drink offerings...sacrificial goat and two lambs as a sin and fellowship offering.... Sorry, it makes more sense that when Jesus ascended on that day, He ascended to the Father as the First Fruits offering fulfilling all these foreshadowed rituals.
[ditto what I put above; Maybe could you clarify this sentence of yours? I think I'm misunderstanding you here. My apologies.]Traditional Pentecost has absolutely nothing to do with First Fruits if you think about it, on the other hand, Jesus ascending to the Father 100% does.
1) almost right away (within the first 10 or so minutes??) I couldn't understand his point when explaining the count to Shavout (something about the 50th falling on random days throughout a week??)... if you find the section I'm talking about, could you maybe help clarify his "thought" on that?;