I just want to know if you agree with the math. Do you?
I'd have to really look into it - I'm no great fan of mathematical explanations.
I just want to know if you agree with the math. Do you?
Debunk it. Show me where Jesus didn't wear a stephanos in the bible.That is some kind of word salad there buddy.
Unless those verses referred to the resurrection of Jesus. I know that at least some of the "second coming" verses do refer to the return from the grave.How is that possible? I think if you can ignore it, it won't be Jesus. If it's Jesus' return, every knee will bow and every tongue confess. It will be inevitable that we will know.
Matthew 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Hi iamsoandso. Most people assume those verses are speaking about the physical return of Christ. The more I read, the more I think that view is incorrect.KJV,,,,
consider this...
If Paul wrote 2Thess. about 51-52 ad and he is wording these things as if they had not taken place yet(fulfilled by Jesus 20 years prior)...then Paul fully knowing Jesus had come prior to this would be saying it had been fulfilled instead of going to be future tense.
There never was a plan "B", nor will there ever be one. No legit dispensationalist believes that anyways. The only concept in dispenationalism is that God has a plan, a schedule, and all will be fulfilled IN THE FULLNESS OF TIME. Period.But it was predicted in the prophets so it was not "plan B" as the dispensationalist theologies would have folks believe.
(Acts 3:24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.)
Then you won't enjoy studying mathematical prophesies. Daniel 9 is very mathematical.I'd have to really look into it - I'm no great fan of mathematical explanations.
The people of the prince who shall come
cant be Jesus, by this time, Jesus came and went
they say our belief makes no sense. yet it makes perfect sense