M
Married_Richenbrachen
Guest
1 Cor 7:18 - 19 [SUP]18 [/SUP]Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised. [SUP]19 [/SUP]Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.[SUP]20 [/SUP]Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called.They were talking about circumcision in order to be right before God. Circumcision wasn't originally intended for that.
If this was what God intended, wouldn't Paul have written something along the lines of "Is any called in uncircumcision? Let him be circumcised, not for his salvation, but as a testimony of good conscience toward God."? He would have treated the issue the same as he treated marriage - "It is best for a man to be circumcised", or something. That he was only talking about salvation does not make sense or fit the scripture. I think the preaching of circumcision and law-keeping for standing with God is a dangerous doctrine. And if you do not think it is for these reasons - for what reason is it?