What should we do to prepare for the rapture?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I wrote it.

Because Jesus goes to a wedding and His servants didn't go, they are watching for His return, and when He returns he prepares dinner for those who were watching. This is not Jesus' wedding, His wedding would be at the Father's house, and He is not going to prepare dinner for the servants after the wedding.

So if you look at the Coronation of Solomon as a type, the banquet that Adonijah held would be a type of this wedding.
You did not explain why you called the wedding a counterfeit celebration, a counterfeit union.

You cannot get that description from the text of the scripture, you have oddly added it from your own imagination.

The scriptures do not say anything like that. It does not call the wedding lavish, or corrupt, or fake, or anything at all.

Why would the Lord go to a counterfeit celebration anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
You did not explain why you called the wedding a counterfeit celebration, a counterfeit union.

You cannot get that description from the text of the scripture, you have oddly added it from your own imagination.

The scriptures do not say anything like that. It does not call the wedding lavish, or corrupt, or fake, or anything at all.

Why would the Lord go to a counterfeit celebration anyway?
The question from the text is what wedding is it? It isn't the Lord's wedding, and why does the Lord reward His servants for being there watching for him during this wedding. That is a very close correlation with Adonijah's banquet. It is also reminiscent of the orgy that takes place at Mt. Sinai when Moses comes down from the mountain and calls the faithful Levites up. The New Testament says that "the apostasy" must come first. That is not my addition, that is the text of the new testament, and the apostasy is a counterfeit union, again, not my interpretation but the New Testament.

So you are right, Luke lets you know that Jesus returns from a wedding to reward His faithful servants, Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, and when we look at the Old Testament to fill in the gaps we see that Adonijah's attempted coup must come first, it is what prompts the coronation of Solomon.

Why must it come first? If you watched the first Godfather movie you would have known, the Godfather knew and told Michael that at his funeral they would try to betray Michael. That was crucial for Michael to learn who was faithful and who would betray him. He needed that last piece to the puzzle before he could "settle accounts".

So then, a very important wedding in the timeline that Jesus tells us about it, just like the Godfather telling Michael, just like king David waiting for Adonijah to play his hand before crowing Solomon, just like God letting the pagan idolaters expose themselves at Mt. Sinai. The Lord rewards His servants because they were faithful to watch, just like Nathan and the others that went to David about Adonijah. Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, but doesn't tell us why. If we look at these other pieces to the puzzle we learn why. This is how the Bible is, here a little and there a little.
 
The question from the text is what wedding is it? It isn't the Lord's wedding, and why does the Lord reward His servants for being there watching for him during this wedding. That is a very close correlation with Adonijah's banquet. It is also reminiscent of the orgy that takes place at Mt. Sinai when Moses comes down from the mountain and calls the faithful Levites up. The New Testament says that "the apostasy" must come first. That is not my addition, that is the text of the new testament, and the apostasy is a counterfeit union, again, not my interpretation but the New Testament.

So you are right, Luke lets you know that Jesus returns from a wedding to reward His faithful servants, Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, and when we look at the Old Testament to fill in the gaps we see that Adonijah's attempted coup must come first, it is what prompts the coronation of Solomon.

Why must it come first? If you watched the first Godfather movie you would have known, the Godfather knew and told Michael that at his funeral they would try to betray Michael. That was crucial for Michael to learn who was faithful and who would betray him. He needed that last piece to the puzzle before he could "settle accounts".

So then, a very important wedding in the timeline that Jesus tells us about it, just like the Godfather telling Michael, just like king David waiting for Adonijah to play his hand before crowing Solomon, just like God letting the pagan idolaters expose themselves at Mt. Sinai. The Lord rewards His servants because they were faithful to watch, just like Nathan and the others that went to David about Adonijah. Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, but doesn't tell us why. If we look at these other pieces to the puzzle we learn why. This is how the Bible is, here a little and there a little.
For example, when they say peace and security, then there is sudden destruction. We know that Antichrist will "confirm the covenant for a week". Does that come before the rapture or after it? Well the apostasy, a covenantal relationship like a wedding, must come first.

We know that Antichrist confirms, strengthens the covenant for one week. That is a crucial prophetic marker, and that "covenant" is what Jesus is describing as a "wedding". Antichrist means "counterfeit Christ". So confirming a covenant between a counterfeit Christ and God's people, that is what is being described as the wedding that prompts Jesus' return.
 
The question from the text is what wedding is it? It isn't the Lord's wedding, and why does the Lord reward His servants for being there watching for him during this wedding. That is a very close correlation with Adonijah's banquet. It is also reminiscent of the orgy that takes place at Mt. Sinai when Moses comes down from the mountain and calls the faithful Levites up. The New Testament says that "the apostasy" must come first. That is not my addition, that is the text of the new testament, and the apostasy is a counterfeit union, again, not my interpretation but the New Testament.

So you are right, Luke lets you know that Jesus returns from a wedding to reward His faithful servants, Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, and when we look at the Old Testament to fill in the gaps we see that Adonijah's attempted coup must come first, it is what prompts the coronation of Solomon.

Why must it come first? If you watched the first Godfather movie you would have known, the Godfather knew and told Michael that at his funeral they would try to betray Michael. That was crucial for Michael to learn who was faithful and who would betray him. He needed that last piece to the puzzle before he could "settle accounts".

So then, a very important wedding in the timeline that Jesus tells us about it, just like the Godfather telling Michael, just like king David waiting for Adonijah to play his hand before crowing Solomon, just like God letting the pagan idolaters expose themselves at Mt. Sinai. The Lord rewards His servants because they were faithful to watch, just like Nathan and the others that went to David about Adonijah. Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, but doesn't tell us why. If we look at these other pieces to the puzzle we learn why. This is how the Bible is, here a little and there a little.
You attempt to interpret a Bible text by referring to the Godfather movie?

Again, the text just says a wedding, not an orgy, not a counterfeit celebration, not apostasy, not a false union. The Lord would not go to such a thing.

Jesus did His first miracle at a wedding in Cana.

You are scrambling scripture to defend a claim that scripture does not even hint at.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
You attempt to interpret a Bible text by referring to the Godfather movie?

Again, the text just says a wedding, not an orgy, not a counterfeit celebration, not apostasy, not a false union. The Lord would not go to such a thing.

Jesus did His first miracle at a wedding in Cana.

You are scrambling scripture to defend a claim that scripture does not even hint at.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
No, I am attempting to illustrate the value of allowing an attempted coup to play out using that movie.

Jesus told us very clearly "you will be judged for every idle word you speak" and that term means "non working". So if the Lord is going to judge us for idle words that means there are no idle, non working words in the Bible.

So go ahead, find what really crucial wedding takes place right before the Lord returns a second time to reward His servants who are there faithfully watching for His return. I would be happy to hear what your explanation is, but if your explanation is that it is a non important wedding, well then you will be judged for not just speaking idle words but accusing the Bible of speaking idle words.

You have emphasized that it is "The Wedding", so tell us what is "the wedding" that Jesus is prophesying about that takes place right before His return? The faithful servants did not go to the wedding, instead they are found watching for the Lord's return. So tell us, what is "The wedding" that Jesus is referring to that the faithful do not attend?
 
No, I am attempting to illustrate the value of allowing an attempted coup to play out using that movie.

Jesus told us very clearly "you will be judged for every idle word you speak" and that term means "non working". So if the Lord is going to judge us for idle words that means there are no idle, non working words in the Bible.

So go ahead, find what really crucial wedding takes place right before the Lord returns a second time to reward His servants who are there faithfully watching for His return. I would be happy to hear what your explanation is, but if your explanation is that it is a non important wedding, well then you will be judged for not just speaking idle words but accusing the Bible of speaking idle words.

You have emphasized that it is "The Wedding", so tell us what is "the wedding" that Jesus is prophesying about that takes place right before His return? The faithful servants did not go to the wedding, instead they are found watching for the Lord's return. So tell us, what is "The wedding" that Jesus is referring to that the faithful do not attend?
This scripture is talking about a master of a house attending a wedding, then returning to the house and its servants.

The Lord Jesus would not attend a counterfeit celebration, an apostasy event, or an orgy.

You will be judged for even suggesting such an absurd, irreverent thing.

Luke 12:35-37 is a metaphorical illustration, with “ye yourselves like unto” signifying the comparison.

The point is not the wedding, but the watching.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
This scripture is talking about a master of a house attending a wedding, then returning to the house and its servants.

The Lord Jesus would not attend a counterfeit celebration, an apostasy event, or an orgy.

You will be judged for even suggesting such an absurd, irreverent thing.

Luke 12:35-37 is a metaphorical illustration, with “ye yourselves like unto” signifying the comparison.

The point is not the wedding, but the watching.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
Right of course. so your interpretation is that "the wedding" is not important. Jesus could have been returning home from anything, he just threw in the word wedding for no reason. So you read the Bible as though it is full of idle words. That by itself is bad enough. But then you have the nerve to attack someone who doesn't as though everyone must treat the Bible as though the words are meaningless.

That is cowardly. Anyone rebuking someone for saying that this wedding is the apostasy which must come first before the Lord returns should at least tell us what the wedding is if it isn't referring to the apostasy. Instead you say "it isn't important". What a sad example you set.
 
Right of course. so your interpretation is that "the wedding" is not important. Jesus could have been returning home from anything, he just threw in the word wedding for no reason. So you read the Bible as though it is full of idle words. That by itself is bad enough. But then you have the nerve to attack someone who doesn't as though everyone must treat the Bible as though the words are meaningless.

That is cowardly. Anyone rebuking someone for saying that this wedding is the apostasy which must come first before the Lord returns should at least tell us what the wedding is if it isn't referring to the apostasy. Instead you say "it isn't important". What a sad example you set.
Again, Jesus did not say He went to a wedding.

He was making an illustration, using the idea of the master of a household going to a wedding. The emphasis is not the wedding, it is the watching of the servants.

Jesus used illustrations of this type many times.

But your depiction of the wedding as correlating to a counterfeit celebration, false union, apostasy, or an orgy is very disrespectful to the Lord. He would never attend such an event.

You are trying to impose a meaning on the scripture that the text does not support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Again, Jesus did not say He went to a wedding.

He was making an illustration, using the idea of the master of a household going to a wedding. The emphasis is not the wedding, it is the watching of the servants.

Jesus used illustrations of this type many times.

But your depiction of the wedding as correlating to a counterfeit celebration, false union, apostasy, or an orgy is very disrespectful to the Lord. He would never attend such an event.

You are trying to impose a meaning on the scripture that the text does not support.
Matthew 26:1 And it came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said unto his disciples, 2 Ye know that after two days is the feast of the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.

Pattern is prophecy. They did this to Jesus, who was the greater David. King David was betrayed to be crucified prior to him becoming King and that was a type and shadow of what would befall Jesus. Every word is important here, because the Feast days are a dress rehearsal for the real event. Paul tells us in Colossians 2 that the Feast days are prophetic. So not only do we know that Jesus will be betrayed the way king David was, we also know that this will take place on the Passover feast because He is the lamb of God, and we know that like a Passover Lamb He will be crucified so that His blood will be drained and poured out onto the mercy seat. Also, since pattern is prophecy, since that which has been is that which shall be, we also know the same thing will happen when Solomon becomes king.

3 Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, 4 And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him.

King Saul assembled in his palace and consulted with his men on how to take David with subtilty. Then prior to Solomon becoming king Adonijah gathered his men into a banquet to consult how to seize the throne by subtilty before Solomon was crowned.

5 But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people.

The bottom line is that God is the one calling the shots, not the enemy. Jesus had to be crucified on Passover because He is the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world. Meanwhile His return and the start of the seventieth week must be on the Feast of Trumpets because that feast announces His return and it is also the first day when the new oil can be offered up to God and it is also the starting day for a shemitah, a seven year period known as the seventieth week.

6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper, 7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat. 8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?

Matthew is general, doesn't name Judas by name, but ask yourself, who would be most offended by this? If Judas is the one stealing the money that is given to Jesus' ministry and this was a really big outpouring that he wasn't able to steal, we can conclude he would have been most offended. So why does Matthew tell us "the disciples" had indignation when we know it was Judas? We know that only Judas betrays Jesus, not the rest of the "disciples". But Judas is operating in the shadows, he talks to one disciple and says "too bad, we could have given that money to the poor" and then that disciple acts like a useful idiot saying out loud to Jesus "Why this waste?" The point is the one who is most vocal in being offended is likely just a useful idiot, not the one who is actually the traitor.

9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor. 10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.

Do you see what is going on, the phrase "when Jesus understood it" meant they were murmuring among themselves and not speaking directly to Jesus.

11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always. 12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial. 13 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.

Wow, do you understand this? The disciples who were murmuring about this and troubling the woman, blaming her for pouring out that ointment on the Lord, they were useful idiots. They didn't understand what was happening. But the woman did. The woman understood that Jesus was going to be crucified in two days. The gospels tell us that Jesus was telling the disciples this, but it also tells us that many of them were too dense to understand. However, this woman did hear it and did understand. Pouring out the ointment was proof she understood. This ointment was her dowry, it was the one thing she had that she could give to one person, and her hope and prayer was that she could make it count. Every one of us has a life. You want that life to count. You want it to mean something. You can join the army, you can be a teacher, you can try to be a rich businessman. Two thousand years ago there were millions of people, all deciding how they wanted to spend their life. How many of those people have a memorial to them that has stood for two thousand years? Today there is a memorial to Jesus that has stood the test of time, there is a gospel of Jesus that has gone into the entire world, and what this woman has done is also a memorial that has stood the test of time.

14 Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests,

There is a distinction between "the disciples" and "the twelve". Matthew doesn't say the apostles were murmuring against the woman, they say the disciples were. The woman who poured out the ointment is one of the disciples.

15 And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver.

A wedding is a covenant relationship. Judas enters into a covenant relationship with these evil chief priests. That is a picture of the apostasy which must come first. Jesus had to be betrayed, David was betrayed, Solomon was betrayed and Jesus had to be betrayed. Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, and there will be this murmuring and complaining about those who are paying a price to announce this beforehand by disciples of the Lord who are "useful idiots". Maybe they are jealous, envious, or simply dim witted. But whatever the reason Judas is able to manipulate them. The same thing will happen prior to the rapture. There must be those telling you beforehand that it will take place because God tells the end from the beginning and that is the proof that He is God. There must be a price to pay because that is called "a sacrifice of love". There must be disciples who are useful idiots of the apostasy. And there must be the apostasy for all of this to take place.

16 And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him.
 

10. Not Soiling Your Garments (Sardis)​

Sardis receives the bluntest diagnosis of all seven churches: "You have a reputation of being alive, but you are dead" (Revelation 3:1). This is a church running entirely on the momentum of its own name — known for vitality it no longer possesses, coasting on a reputation increasingly detached from reality. It is, in the structure of this whole study, the clearest picture of a body that has quietly entered the "marriage in name only" stage: the form of relationship to Christ persists while the substance has already died.

And yet, right in the middle of this severe verdict, comes an unexpected line of hope: "Yet you have a few names in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy" (Revelation 3:4). Even inside a body pronounced dead, a remnant remains — small, named individually rather than praised as a group, distinguished by one specific quality: they did not soil their garments.

This gives us something important and freeing: faithfulness does not require you to fix, save, or single-handedly revive a compromised institution before you can be counted faithful within it. The "few names" at Sardis are not commended for reforming the church around them. They are commended simply for remaining personally clean while everyone around them had let their garments become soiled — for refusing to let the surrounding compromise become their own compromise, even while remaining physically present in that same body.

This matters enormously for anyone who finds themselves in an institution, a family, a workplace, or a congregation that looks, from the outside, more alive than it actually is. You are not required to have the influence to turn the whole structure around. You are required to keep your own garment clean — your own conduct, your own convictions, your own devotion — regardless of whether the larger body around you responds.

The promise attached to this small remnant is specific and personal: they will walk with Christ in white, because they are worthy. Not because they were powerful, not because they were public, not because they changed Sardis's reputation — simply because, inside a dying structure, they individually refused to let the death become theirs. That is available to anyone, in any compromised body, right now.
 
Matthew 26:1 And it came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said unto his disciples, 2 Ye know that after two days is the feast of the passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.

Pattern is prophecy. They did this to Jesus, who was the greater David. King David was betrayed to be crucified prior to him becoming King and that was a type and shadow of what would befall Jesus. Every word is important here, because the Feast days are a dress rehearsal for the real event. Paul tells us in Colossians 2 that the Feast days are prophetic. So not only do we know that Jesus will be betrayed the way king David was, we also know that this will take place on the Passover feast because He is the lamb of God, and we know that like a Passover Lamb He will be crucified so that His blood will be drained and poured out onto the mercy seat. Also, since pattern is prophecy, since that which has been is that which shall be, we also know the same thing will happen when Solomon becomes king.

3 Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, 4 And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him.

King Saul assembled in his palace and consulted with his men on how to take David with subtilty. Then prior to Solomon becoming king Adonijah gathered his men into a banquet to consult how to seize the throne by subtilty before Solomon was crowned.

5 But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people.

The bottom line is that God is the one calling the shots, not the enemy. Jesus had to be crucified on Passover because He is the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world. Meanwhile His return and the start of the seventieth week must be on the Feast of Trumpets because that feast announces His return and it is also the first day when the new oil can be offered up to God and it is also the starting day for a shemitah, a seven year period known as the seventieth week.

6 Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper, 7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat. 8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?

Matthew is general, doesn't name Judas by name, but ask yourself, who would be most offended by this? If Judas is the one stealing the money that is given to Jesus' ministry and this was a really big outpouring that he wasn't able to steal, we can conclude he would have been most offended. So why does Matthew tell us "the disciples" had indignation when we know it was Judas? We know that only Judas betrays Jesus, not the rest of the "disciples". But Judas is operating in the shadows, he talks to one disciple and says "too bad, we could have given that money to the poor" and then that disciple acts like a useful idiot saying out loud to Jesus "Why this waste?" The point is the one who is most vocal in being offended is likely just a useful idiot, not the one who is actually the traitor.

9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor. 10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.

Do you see what is going on, the phrase "when Jesus understood it" meant they were murmuring among themselves and not speaking directly to Jesus.

11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always. 12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial. 13 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached in the whole world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.

Wow, do you understand this? The disciples who were murmuring about this and troubling the woman, blaming her for pouring out that ointment on the Lord, they were useful idiots. They didn't understand what was happening. But the woman did. The woman understood that Jesus was going to be crucified in two days. The gospels tell us that Jesus was telling the disciples this, but it also tells us that many of them were too dense to understand. However, this woman did hear it and did understand. Pouring out the ointment was proof she understood. This ointment was her dowry, it was the one thing she had that she could give to one person, and her hope and prayer was that she could make it count. Every one of us has a life. You want that life to count. You want it to mean something. You can join the army, you can be a teacher, you can try to be a rich businessman. Two thousand years ago there were millions of people, all deciding how they wanted to spend their life. How many of those people have a memorial to them that has stood for two thousand years? Today there is a memorial to Jesus that has stood the test of time, there is a gospel of Jesus that has gone into the entire world, and what this woman has done is also a memorial that has stood the test of time.

14 Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests,

There is a distinction between "the disciples" and "the twelve". Matthew doesn't say the apostles were murmuring against the woman, they say the disciples were. The woman who poured out the ointment is one of the disciples.

15 And said unto them, What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver.

A wedding is a covenant relationship. Judas enters into a covenant relationship with these evil chief priests. That is a picture of the apostasy which must come first. Jesus had to be betrayed, David was betrayed, Solomon was betrayed and Jesus had to be betrayed. Paul tells us the apostasy must come first, and there will be this murmuring and complaining about those who are paying a price to announce this beforehand by disciples of the Lord who are "useful idiots". Maybe they are jealous, envious, or simply dim witted. But whatever the reason Judas is able to manipulate them. The same thing will happen prior to the rapture. There must be those telling you beforehand that it will take place because God tells the end from the beginning and that is the proof that He is God. There must be a price to pay because that is called "a sacrifice of love". There must be disciples who are useful idiots of the apostasy. And there must be the apostasy for all of this to take place.

16 And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him.
This has nothing to do with the scripture you misinterpret. The wedding mentioned is not said to be apostasy or anything negative, it serves only as an illustration.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
 
This has nothing to do with the scripture you misinterpret. The wedding mentioned is not said to be apostasy or anything negative, it serves only as an illustration.

Luke 12

35 Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning;

36 And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding; that when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immediately.

37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
So then you have two options. Either there is a wedding that the Lord will return from at His second coming that his faithful servants do not go to, if so, tell us what it is. Or it was just a meaningless addition and Jesus could just as easily not have said where He was coming home late from, and hence it is an idle word that you think Luke should be condemned for adding.

Which is it?
 
So then you have two options. Either there is a wedding that the Lord will return from at His second coming that his faithful servants do not go to, if so, tell us what it is. Or it was just a meaningless addition and Jesus could just as easily not have said where He was coming home late from, and hence it is an idle word that you think Luke should be condemned for adding.

Which is it?
Your interpretation that the Lord attended a counterfeit celebration or an orgy is ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Your interpretation that the Lord attended a counterfeit celebration or an orgy is ridiculous.
That is not my interpretation. My interpretation is that Moses being sent down from the mountain top as a type of Christ because of the orgy prompted the return is a type of the second coming.

Likewise the gathering on the mountain top to call down fire was also a type of the rapture event, it was a gathering that included 400 prophets of Baal.

Likewise Adonijah having a banquet to crown himself King is what prompted David to crown Solomon when He did.

The same can be seen with Esther and Mordecai, it was the banquet with the wicked Haman that precedes the judgement on the coup and lifting up Mordecai to be a prime minister.

Samson pushing out the pillars is also a type of the rapture and this takes place at a festival to Dagon.

It is not a coincidence or an idle word that Luke says it will be like the master coming home late from a wedding.

A wedding is taking place, the "confirming the covenant with everyone saying peace and security" that immediately precedes the start of the Day of the Lord and the sudden destruction.
 
I see another answer to consider, as related to the OP question is, nothing.

Everyone reading this thread will live and pass on eventually. Never witnessing the Rapture to occur.

Jesus,who should be called Immanuel,because that is the name Gods angel told Mary to give her coming son, said,before that generation, "this generation", to whom he was speaking ,passed away,they shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds. Matthew 24.

But later he said,no one knows,not even the Son, himself,knows the day or hour of his second coming. Only the father,who was Immanuel,knows.

Over 2000 years now.

Why look for what God only knows,at his own time and place.

Be the second coming of the announced, "Christos",yourselves. Anointed by Holy Spirit within us.

Immanuel departed. But, we're suppose to represent. Temples carrying his Holy Spirit.

Jesus,Immanuel,left Earth but we're still here. A second opportunity,coming,of his truth and presence.

Jesus told his Disciples,regarding the miracles they witnessed from him,greater than those things shall they do.

We're indwelt with the power that did those things.
Have faith. Live now. Make his good news to be written again and again everywhere you go.

You want rapture? Live as if the power of the Holy Spirit fills your body,runs through your veins as your life blood,makes the hairs he numbers on your head shine as if a halo that beckons in this worlds darkness,to see hope in his light.

🙏💞And then live it.
 
I see another answer to consider, as related to the OP question is, nothing.

Everyone reading this thread will live and pass on eventually. Never witnessing the Rapture to occur.

Jesus,who should be called Immanuel,because that is the name Gods angel told Mary to give her coming son, said,before that generation, "this generation", to whom he was speaking ,passed away,they shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds. Matthew 24.

But later he said,no one knows,not even the Son, himself,knows the day or hour of his second coming. Only the father,who was Immanuel,knows.

Over 2000 years now.

Why look for what God only knows,at his own time and place.

Be the second coming of the announced, "Christos",yourselves. Anointed by Holy Spirit within us.

Immanuel departed. But, we're suppose to represent. Temples carrying his Holy Spirit.

Jesus,Immanuel,left Earth but we're still here. A second opportunity,coming,of his truth and presence.

Jesus told his Disciples,regarding the miracles they witnessed from him,greater than those things shall they do.

We're indwelt with the power that did those things.
Have faith. Live now. Make his good news to be written again and again everywhere you go.

You want rapture? Live as if the power of the Holy Spirit fills your body,runs through your veins as your life blood,makes the hairs he numbers on your head shine as if a halo that beckons in this worlds darkness,to see hope in his light.

🙏💞And then live it.
Luke 12:37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them.
 

1. Be Dressed Ready for Service​

"Be dressed ready for service and keep your lamps burning, like servants waiting for their master to return from a wedding banquet, so that when he comes and knocks they can immediately open the door for him" (Luke 12:35-37). This is not a passive posture. Dressed and burning are both active states requiring continual maintenance — a robe can come untucked, a lamp can run dry of oil. Readiness is not a decision made once; it is a condition kept.

Notice what the servants are actually waiting for: a master returning from a wedding banquet. That detail is usually read as incidental — wedding feasts ran long, so nobody knew exactly when the master would walk back through the door. But sit with the picture a moment longer. The servants themselves were not at that banquet. They stayed home, dressed, lamps lit, doing the work of the house while somewhere else a celebration was happening without them. Their entire assignment was to be found faithful at the door regardless of how long the celebration outside dragged on.

That is the position of the faithful in every age: excluded from whatever counterfeit celebration is running its course elsewhere, and entirely undistracted by the fact that it's happening. The servants don't send someone to check on the party. They don't grow anxious that they're missing out. They tend the lamp.

And the payoff for this posture is astonishing, and easy to miss on a quick read: "Truly I tell you, he will dress himself to serve, will have them recline at the table and will come and wait on them" (v. 37). The master, upon finding his servants ready, reverses the entire household order. He serves them. This is the picture behind every warning in this study — Eden's expulsion, Sinai's golden calf, Adonijah's interrupted feast, Samson's collapsing temple, the letters to the seven churches. In every instance, a false celebration is underway, and the true Lord's return breaks in on it. But the outcome for the ones who kept watch is not merely survival. It's reward, intimacy, and being served by the very One they were waiting for.

So "be dressed ready for service" is not a grim, white-knuckled command to avoid getting caught unprepared. It's an invitation into the best possible outcome available to any servant: the master returning not to scold you for missing the party, but to sit you down and serve you himself.
Prepare for the Great Tribulation first, rapture is post trib.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Prepare for the Great Tribulation first, rapture is post trib.
Not necessarily.
There are verses that lead readers to believe in a pre-great tribulation, mid-great tribulation, and post tribulation Rapture.

Pre-Trib makes sense for those in Christ before God pours out his wrath on the Earth.
Revelation 3
1 Thessalonians 5

Raptured away mid-great tribulation would make sense as far as shifting those who came to Christ during the great tribulation.

And after it is over with, post-great tribulation, taking away others who came into grace after the mid-tribulation. Matthew 24
Revelation 20
 
Not necessarily.
There are verses that lead readers to believe in a pre-great tribulation, mid-great tribulation, and post tribulation Rapture.

Pre-Trib makes sense for those in Christ before God pours out his wrath on the Earth.
Revelation 3
1 Thessalonians 5

Raptured away mid-great tribulation would make sense as far as shifting those who came to Christ during the great tribulation.

And after it is over with, post-great tribulation, taking away others who came into grace after the mid-tribulation. Matthew 24
Revelation 20
1 Thess, 4:15-16, resurrection precedes rapture, the dead must rise first; Rev. 20, resurrection takes place after the tribulation, the saved rise at the beginning of the millennial kingdom, the unsaved at the end; Dan. 12:2, Jn. 5:29-30, only these two resurrections in Rev. 20, no other resurrection before that. No resurrection, no rapture.

Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation. (Jn. 5:29-30)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm