“Therefore what God has joined together, let no man seperate” - Matthew 19:6.
I know you're joking, but marriage is what God uses to describe His relationship with the church. So I would tread carefully.Therefore, marriage is prostitution.
I know you're joking, but marriage is what God uses to describe His relationship with the church. So I would tread carefully.
Even in the bible, a price is paid for a bride.
I challenge all you idealistic ones. Would you vote for a change in laws, that a plaintiff in a no-fault divorce, have to waive any claims to money or property?
Changes things, doesn't it?
Dory please ignore lynx as he has dismissed my raw but true statement that marriage is a license for nonsinful sex.....its just a fact...why else would someone get married other than sex....(yea there's the love riches stuff around it but the end goal is sex plain and simple..)
Lynx don't make me go dr. doom on youor call my megazord.......
I am not joking, and I shall not tread carefully.
All the things people can describe as a reason for marriage, if you exclude sex, those reasons, things, or qualities can be found in a relationship with someone you are not married to. I could just hang out with a guy, and not be lonely, have a parnership, have love..... all those things, except sex.
Therefore we get married just to have sex, and reproduce. It cost something tangible to be married, therefore marriage is legalized prostitution.
I made a point earlier in this thread about changing marriage laws.... no one has responded to it.
If everyone was willing to enter a marriage, knowing there would be no financial benefit, I would change my mind.
Actually we had a thread a while ago about prenups I think it was (you like digging up threads, I'll let you hunt if you want) where I took pretty much that position. Then another member brought up the situation of abandonment (if a guy abandons his wife and isn't supporting her and their kids at all, but doesn't file divorce because he doesn't want to pay) and how sometimes filing was the only way for the woman to get the support her "husband" should be giving to his family.
The problem with this statement is that many non-Christian couples who are having extramarital sex, still want to get married (at least one of them often does). If marriage were only about sex, this wouldn't be a thing.

The union of husband and wife in heart, body, and mind is intended by God for their mutual joy; for the help and comfort given one another in prosperity and adversity; and, when it is God’s will, for the procreation of children and their nurture in the knowledge and love of the Lord. Therefore marriage is not to be entered into unadvisedly or lightly, but reverently, deliberately, and in accordance with the purposes for which it was instituted by God.
From the Episcopalian Prayer book.
Actually we had a thread a while ago about prenups I think it was (you like digging up threads, I'll let you hunt if you want) where I took pretty much that position. Then another member brought up the situation of abandonment (if a guy abandons his wife and isn't supporting her and their kids at all, but doesn't file divorce because he doesn't want to pay) and how sometimes filing was the only way for the woman to get the support her "husband" should be giving to his family.
The problem with this statement is that many non-Christian couples who are having extramarital sex, still want to get married (at least one of them often does). If marriage were only about sex, this wouldn't be a thing.