Where does agnostisism lead?
- Thread starter EdC
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L
Well, for starters, you've set up at least two false dichotomies here:
1. Spiritual belief system vs. a logical belief system.
2. Faith vs. understanding.
This is what a false dichotomy is:
http://wiki.c2.com/?FalseDichotomy
A dichotomy is a set of two mutually exclusive, jointly exhaustive alternatives. Dichotomies are typically expressed with the words "either" and "or", like this: "Either the test is wrong or the program is wrong."
A false dichotomy is a dichotomy that is not jointly exhaustive (there are other alternatives), or that is not mutually exclusive (the alternatives overlap), or that is possibly neither. Note that the example given above is not mutually exclusive, since the test and the program could both be wrong. It's not jointly exhaustive either, since they could both be correct, but it could be a hardware error, a compiler error and so on.
In the options that you've cited, could a spiritual belief system and a logical belief system overlap?
Yes, they most certainly could.
In the options that you've cited, could faith and understanding overlap?
Yes, they most certainly could.
Let me give you an example to illustrate what I am saying to you.
A good portion of the Bible is prophetic in nature.
In fact, one of the ways in which the God of the Bible distinguishes himself from dumb idols or "other gods" is by correctly forecasting the future.
We read:
Isaiah chapter 46
[9] Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,
[10] Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
The God of the Bible claims that there is none like him, and then gives the example of how he "declares the end from the beginning, and from ancient time the things that are not yet done" or how he accurately forecasts the future.
In relation to his claim, if one first properly understands what God has actually prophesied, and then looks to future history for an exact match, AND FINDS IT, wouldn't both "a spiritual belief system and a logical belief system" and "faith and understanding" overlap?
Yes, they would.
Quite frankly, having read your post, it seems as if you don't even know what an "agnostic" is:
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=agnostic
agnostic (n.)
1870, "one who professes that the existence of a First Cause and the essential nature of things are not and cannot be known" [Klein]; coined by T.H. Huxley, supposedly in September 1869, from Greek agnostos "unknown, unknowable," from a- "not" (see a- (3)) + gnōstos "(to be) known," from PIE root *gno- "to know." Sometimes said to be a reference to Paul's mention of the altar to "the Unknown God" in Acts, but according to Huxley it was coined with reference to the early Church movement known as Gnosticism (see Gnostic). The adjective also is first recorded 1870.
With the false dichotomies you've mentioned in your OP, dichotomies in which you've seemingly sought to distinguish between that which is spiritual and that which is purely natural, it seems more like you're describing an "atheist" than an "agnostic":
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=atheist
atheist (n.)
1570s, "godless person, one who denies the existence of a supreme, intelligent being to whom moral obligation is due," from French athéiste (16c.), from Greek atheos "without god, denying the gods; abandoned of the gods; godless, ungodly," from a- "without" (see a- (3)) + theos "a god" (from PIE root *dhes-, forming words for religious concepts).
So, in answer to your question:
Yes, there is room at my table for an agnostic to ask any questions that they'd like to ask.
If you ever become an agnostic, then pull up a chair, and let's chat.
In the interim, if you as an atheist want to chat, then that's fine too.
1. Spiritual belief system vs. a logical belief system.
2. Faith vs. understanding.
This is what a false dichotomy is:
http://wiki.c2.com/?FalseDichotomy
A dichotomy is a set of two mutually exclusive, jointly exhaustive alternatives. Dichotomies are typically expressed with the words "either" and "or", like this: "Either the test is wrong or the program is wrong."
A false dichotomy is a dichotomy that is not jointly exhaustive (there are other alternatives), or that is not mutually exclusive (the alternatives overlap), or that is possibly neither. Note that the example given above is not mutually exclusive, since the test and the program could both be wrong. It's not jointly exhaustive either, since they could both be correct, but it could be a hardware error, a compiler error and so on.
In the options that you've cited, could a spiritual belief system and a logical belief system overlap?
Yes, they most certainly could.
In the options that you've cited, could faith and understanding overlap?
Yes, they most certainly could.
Let me give you an example to illustrate what I am saying to you.
A good portion of the Bible is prophetic in nature.
In fact, one of the ways in which the God of the Bible distinguishes himself from dumb idols or "other gods" is by correctly forecasting the future.
We read:
Isaiah chapter 46
[9] Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,
[10] Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
The God of the Bible claims that there is none like him, and then gives the example of how he "declares the end from the beginning, and from ancient time the things that are not yet done" or how he accurately forecasts the future.
In relation to his claim, if one first properly understands what God has actually prophesied, and then looks to future history for an exact match, AND FINDS IT, wouldn't both "a spiritual belief system and a logical belief system" and "faith and understanding" overlap?
Yes, they would.
Quite frankly, having read your post, it seems as if you don't even know what an "agnostic" is:
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=agnostic
agnostic (n.)
1870, "one who professes that the existence of a First Cause and the essential nature of things are not and cannot be known" [Klein]; coined by T.H. Huxley, supposedly in September 1869, from Greek agnostos "unknown, unknowable," from a- "not" (see a- (3)) + gnōstos "(to be) known," from PIE root *gno- "to know." Sometimes said to be a reference to Paul's mention of the altar to "the Unknown God" in Acts, but according to Huxley it was coined with reference to the early Church movement known as Gnosticism (see Gnostic). The adjective also is first recorded 1870.
With the false dichotomies you've mentioned in your OP, dichotomies in which you've seemingly sought to distinguish between that which is spiritual and that which is purely natural, it seems more like you're describing an "atheist" than an "agnostic":
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=atheist
atheist (n.)
1570s, "godless person, one who denies the existence of a supreme, intelligent being to whom moral obligation is due," from French athéiste (16c.), from Greek atheos "without god, denying the gods; abandoned of the gods; godless, ungodly," from a- "without" (see a- (3)) + theos "a god" (from PIE root *dhes-, forming words for religious concepts).
So, in answer to your question:
Yes, there is room at my table for an agnostic to ask any questions that they'd like to ask.
If you ever become an agnostic, then pull up a chair, and let's chat.
In the interim, if you as an atheist want to chat, then that's fine too.
-
1
- Show all
First 
welcome to CC and very nice to meet you
You are asking important questions , nothing wrong with that .
There can be only one Creator and the Bible is the one book that makes complete sense . When it says God is love , perfect, good, etc and to put all our trust in Him...that is what we are to do .
Don't worry about things only God knows, the Word says He is a just Judge who is good.
Do not boast so proudly, or let arrogance come from your mouth, for the LORD is a God who knows, and by Him actions are weighed. 1 Sam 2:3
I could go on but will stop, God bless you.
welcome to CC and very nice to meet you You are asking important questions , nothing wrong with that .
There can be only one Creator and the Bible is the one book that makes complete sense . When it says God is love , perfect, good, etc and to put all our trust in Him...that is what we are to do .
Don't worry about things only God knows, the Word says He is a just Judge who is good.
Do not boast so proudly, or let arrogance come from your mouth, for the LORD is a God who knows, and by Him actions are weighed. 1 Sam 2:3
I could go on but will stop, God bless you.
-
1
- Show all