Where were you....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trinity33
  • Start date Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
RachelBibleStudent said:
wrong as usual...

conspiracy theorists make a big deal about some list of between 1,000 and 2,000 engineers who agree with 9/11 conspiracy theories...this is less than 0.1% of the engineers in the united states...

in other words...a very small percentage...just like i said...

this percentage also happens to be on a similar level as the percentage of people with schizophrenic disorders...
Click to expand...

Rachel, all of the architects and engineers in the country haven't looked at the evidence. They found 2,000 to sign who attended their seminars. That's a much larger percentage than you would have the reader believe. Clearly 2,000 architects and engineers in attendance were not schizophrenic.
 
can you show us a photo of said molten steel? Or better yet a video with clear proof its from that day?
 
Nautilus said:
can you show us a photo of said molten steel? Or better yet a video with clear proof its from that day?
Click to expand...

You don't trust the New York City firefighters who risked their lives and lost friends and family on 9-11? you think they had an axe to grind or are equally as schizophrenic? You are both ridiculous.
 
RachelBibleStudent said:
paragraph three from my post...'conspiracy theorists don't like to read much'...did i call that or what?

if you can't even make the effort to read more than a sentence or two...then no wonder you are so appallingly ignorant about the facts of 9/11...

and after this you expect me to believe that -honesty- has any part in your agenda here?
Click to expand...
Rachel....I can see now that you are straight
154f37c.jpg

Really am done replying to you. You have had evidence and still you
figurine_trolls_-_nyform_840178.jpg
 
I love how when people dont automatically accept your theories as truth they are trolls.
 
Nautilus said:
I love how when people dont automatically accept your theories as truth they are trolls.
Click to expand...

That's funny, you become trolls and we become schizophrenic and delusional... The simple reality is that we have seen too much obvious information to stay quiet, and you (and others) have decided not to see the truth (for whatever reasons) There is no point for all of us to continue this back and forth, we aren't going anywhere. I will continue to post threads of information so that others can be aware, I'm sure you will continue to ask why and Rachel will continue to manipulate her point using big words and name calling, in an effort to appear like she knows what she is talking about while at the same time attempting to destroy her opponents credibility. You can both have this thread. I'll see you in the next ;)
 
RachelBibleStudent said:
already addressed...which was quite generous given the fact that there is no physical evidence of the molten steel...
Click to expand...

Oh really? There's no evidence of molten steel at 9/11, huh? Then please explain to us what this liquid orange stuff is, because it IS molten steel and there IS physical evidence of it!!

<span style="color:#000080;"><font size="4"><em>[video=youtube;nqJSDn5dgJc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqJSDn5dgJc[/video]
 
blue_ladybug said:
Oh really? There's no evidence of molten steel at 9/11, huh? Then please explain to us what this liquid orange stuff is, because it IS molten steel and there IS physical evidence of it!!

<span style="color:#000080;"><font size="4"><em>[video=youtube;nqJSDn5dgJc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqJSDn5dgJc[/video]
Click to expand...
Ummmmm that be looking like hmmmm melting steel....I say "melting" maybe they don't exactly know what molten... Is :-) lol does that actually say falling "liquid" metal?
 
Deadtosin said:
can you give me an example where a structural collapse resulted in molten steel?
Click to expand...

possibly because no towers that big have ever undergone an uncontrolled collapse before...

if i find the time to get out my physics book from college and calculate the heat yield from the collapse i might start a new thread on that...
 
Deadtosin said:
I'm sure you will continue to ask why and Rachel will continue to manipulate her point using big words and name calling, in an effort to appear like she knows what she is talking about while at the same time attempting to destroy her opponents credibility.
Click to expand...

this is typical of people who never bother to do their homework...your disdain for 'big words' simply shows that you haven't bothered to find out what they mean...just like conspiracy theorists don't bother to find out a -lot- of stuff...
 
blue_ladybug said:
Oh really? There's no evidence of molten steel at 9/11, huh? Then please explain to us what this liquid orange stuff is, because it IS molten steel and there IS physical evidence of it!!

<span style="color:#000080;"><font size="4"><em>[video=youtube;nqJSDn5dgJc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqJSDn5dgJc[/video]
Click to expand...

this is all based on the assumption that anything bright orange has to be molten steel...other metals melt at lower temperatures...and some of those pictures don't show anything other than an apparent luminous glow that could even be an artificial light or something...

where are all the solidified pools of formerly molten metal? for that matter why are there no clear unambiguous close up photos of molten metal? most of these are almost as bad as photos of the loch ness monster...
 
Last edited:
RachelBibleStudent said:
this is typical of people who never bother to do their homework...your disdain for 'big words' simply shows that you haven't bothered to find out what they mean...just like conspiracy theorists don't bother to find out a -lot- of stuff...
Click to expand...

I don't have a disdain for big words. I was just pointing out that there is an actual technique which utilizes big words and name calling to be persuasive. People will tend to believe that you know what you are talking about and it naturally follows that you will have to type more to put in all those words, which adds to the facade that you actually had something meaningful to say. When in actuality you keep doing the same things over and over again. Brushing the evidence aside, using the term "conspiracy theorists" to package our statements into a ridiculous concept and THEN you use a big jumble of words to say relatively meaningless jargon.

You can't account for the free fall of building 7 None of your physics can explain that. But low and behold you will fight it. Ridiculous.
 
RachelBibleStudent said:
this is all based on the assumption that anything bright orange has to be molten steel...other metals melt at lower temperatures...and some of those pictures don't show anything other than an apparent luminous glow that could even be an artificial light or something...

where are all the solidified pools of formerly molten metal? for that matter why are there no clear unambiguous close up photos of molten metal? most of these are almost as bad as photos of the loch ness monster...
Click to expand...

Not ALL metals burn bright orange when molten. For instance, molten aluminum is a silvery color. The idea of an artificial light is ridiculous. It's obviously not a light of any type.
 
I wish I could just stop this thread it started where were you and ended with people trying to argue. Is there anyway to dismantle this thread?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back