Just wondering where in the Bible it says this. We do not need a mediator between us and Christ. We have direct access to Christ our saviour through the Holy Spirit. We do not need a connecting medium.
Yes, the pastor is responsible for what he teaches, but where is the similarity between OT priest and the pastor? These are two different roles. A pastor does not have to make sacrifices on behalf of the congregation, just like a priest would. The sacrifice is already made by Christ, the Mediator. It is finished. Now we have direct access to Christ. We do not need a pastor to mediate for us and do things on our behalf. We need a pastor or an overseer to help us establish that connection with Christ, the mediator, and NOT TO BECOME THAT CONNECTION.
Sorry, but in this age there are too many self-appointed pastors. A pastor, an overseer, a deacon who is chosen by God must prove this by being on the front line and leading by example. He must decrease so that Christ may increase in the congregation. He must be the most humble person. Some great leaders of the NT such as Peter or Paul, who had a great impact on the early church spent every ounce of their energies to help people establish that connection with Christ. They did not become the mediators. They did not live in all-expenses-paid houses. They worked with their own hands. Yes, I have seen many such genuine church leaders in India, and they do not claim to be mediators.
Agree with you on this one. Christ has become the mediator because he has sacrificed himself for us. A pastor does not come anywhere near this to qualify to be a mediator.