Nope....of course that's not who they have set aside as DNA sources. That's not how this works.
What I'm saying is that they CAN....not that they will.
Why doesn’t Hebrews mention ….
- Thread starter Pilgrimshope
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nope....of course that's not who they have set aside as DNA sources. That's not how this works.
What I'm saying is that they CAN....not that they will.
For some things, if one does not have first hand empirical experience best to take it with a huge grain of salt.
There is a lot of half truths and out right deceptions out there.
Instead of going back and forth on a subject that doesn't really interest me, can you provide a link or something that verifies your claim?
The letter to the Hebrews was written before the destruction of the second temple (70 AD). There would be no reason to talk about restoring something that was then standing in Jerusalem. Further, the Jews were "in the land" at the time the letter was written, even though they were ruled by the Romans.
I've noticed that you are so bent on what you believe that you ignore and challenge anyone and anything that has even a possibility of putting you in check. You are really a piece of work.
I've noticed that you are so bent on what you believe that you ignore and challenge anyone and anything that has even a possibility of putting you in check. You are really a piece of work.
I'm doubtful of his claim and presented an alternate hypothesis. He made a claim, which I highly doubt is true, and introduced doubt into the discussion to get him to either drop the matter or support his claim with evidence. Pretty reasonable approach IMO. Are you suggesting that I'm supposed to just believe anything anybody says?
H
Howdy
Guest
God will not accept their offering because it denies Jesus as the Messiah.
It will be just the opposite of purification.
It will be blasphemy.
Seems like they would have to convert to Christianity huh ? And accept the name of Jesus which …. Then there’s no need for a temple he comes to dwell in the temple of the person with us ….
You made the claim. If you can't easily provide evidence for me to verify its truth, then I will assume it's not true.
But in the past I have looked for what you claimed and found nothing of substance.
No you wont....
People, including myself, have before and you still refuse to believe....neverminding how ridiculous your arguments have looked....you still hold on dearly.
I'm a pretty reasonable fella willing to admit when I'm wrong and amend my understanding. I'll just bow out now and let you believe what you want.
Hebrews was written to Jewish believers. The physical temple was not yet destroyed. The writer was encouraging/warning them not to return to the old customs.
The book of Revelation was written in 95 AD. The temple had been destroyed by then. Chapter 13 describes the Antichrist being seated in the temple and claiming to be God. That will be difficult if there is no temple.
If I was writing to Jewish believers who were wavering about entering fully into the New Covenant, I'd not mention a rebuilt temple. And I doubt if God revealed this to the writer anyway. It was not necessary.
What do you make of Revelation 11? It mentions the temple, two witnesses killed in Jerusalem and a great earthquake that destroys 1/10 of the city. 7,000 people die. And that in AD95, looking to the future. Has there ever been 144,000 Israelites preaching the gospel? Why do I say that they preach the gospel? They are servants of God, sealed and protected. And after they 144,000 are sealed, a great multitude are standing before the throne of God and the Lamb.
"The meek will inherit the earth". Does that not mean an earthly, physical kingdom here on earth? The Lord's prayer is even clearer. God's will is for His kingdom to come - on earth as in heaven. This is the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth, followed by a new heavens and a new earth. It's all there in the Book.
Paul almost certainly did not write Hebrews. I don't know why anyone would imagine that he did. The temple will be rebuilt. Sacrifices will be restored. The book of Revelation makes that clear. Revelation was written in 95 AD, after Herod's temple had been destroyed. The Antichrist will occupy the temple and boast that he is God.
All the requirements for a new temple are in place. Red heifers have been specially bred, the temple artifacts remade and even a new Sanhedrin appointed. It is even possible that the traditional site of the temple is incorrect and the new temple could be built without upsetting the Muslims.
Did I miss the post with solid evidence .........instead it slid to making it about you... very telling.
I found it... the music in the background certainly adds to the veracity!
