M
Miri
Guest
I can't do it... sorry. Edit - I can't prove the KJV is inerrant.
Bump.
Finally got to a truth, so it's just an opinion on your part.
Thats all we have been trying to tell you.![]()
Bump.........
I can't do it... sorry. Edit - I can't prove the KJV is inerrant.
Bump.
Finally got to a truth, so it's just an opinion on your part.
Thats all we have been trying to tell you.![]()
Bump.........
It has nothing do with my opinion. I can't prove anything to anyone who doesn't understand the subject.
The other side of things (some which are against it) is just as cultish, they might come up behind and say something like , "This is what you get for reading the KJV, which is often translated wrong!!!"
Cults on both sides of the fence it seems
Wow. Not only is this despicably arrogant and demeaning, it is yet another logical fallacy: an ad hominem attack. You can't refute an opponent's position, so you attack the opponent directly instead.
Hi P,
I don't think anyone is against the KJV on here, that hasn't been said as far as I can
see.![]()
May I side-track just a moment to ask a question?
Are most of the topics in this Bible Discussion Forum this unfriendly? I've already figured out that I have very little business in the Politics section here because that place does get very heated, but if it's the same in Bible Discussions, then I'd like to know so I can avoid it in the future.
David was an adulterer. Paul was a murderer. Moses was a murderer. It's not about using a perfect man, but about a perfect God preserving His words for man.
All SCRIPTURE is inspired by God, not the man doing the writing. The matter at hand I am interested in is God's preservation of His pure words in the English language.
David was not inspired when he wrote Scripture. The Scripture is inspired, David preserved the Scripture by writing it down through the Holy Spirit.
David was an adulterer. Paul was a murderer. Moses was a murderer. It's not about using a perfect man, but about a perfect God preserving His words for man.
It's interesting how you try to create a legitimate defense and have grabbed on to a truth to attempt to apply it to your philosophy
what you are doing here, is attempting o give the KJV credence as inspired and original because it would have to be original in order to be inspired
the KJV contains the inspiration as do the other translations, that originally was given by God, through His Spirit, to the writers and prophets
the KJV is not inspired...the NIV is inspired too if you want to make that your 'proof'
we have ORIGINALS available...so why would we need the KJV for English speaking people? That makes no sense at all...
According to you, unless you speak English and have the KJV circa 1611, you will never really have the truth
yet, we know for a fact, that the 1611 version has been corrected numerous times
Yep, that's what we call a Divine Providence. God can use even the wicked King or the animal to accomplish His will.
We have originals? Where?
There are no original Scriptures anywhere. They are all copies of copies of copies etc...
another thought on the above from John146
if there were never originals, then the KJV was also translated from copies of copies
perfect? not really then
check out archaeology ..you'll dig it