i'm always skeptical & suspicious whenever anyone dissuades me from increasing in learning, accumulating knowledge or growing in understanding.
Yes, a knowledge of the Hebrew is sometimes needed to understand scripture.One phrase that is often mooted by those who wish to manipulate or deceive (e.g. tithing) or even somebody who wants to talk you round to their own interpretation of the Bible is
"You've got to read the Hebrew to truly/fully understand the context/meaning".
To people that say this kind of thing, are you suggesting that God was unsuccessful in translating the Bible to other languages, or that God did so incorrectly or not fully?
i'm always skeptical & suspicious whenever anyone dissuades me from increasing in learning, accumulating knowledge or growing in understanding.
![]()
Interesting point actually because if somebody claims that their preferred version more accurately represents the word of God, then they are implying that God incorrectly or inaccurately translated the Bible for all to read.
are you implying all versions in all languages are equally valid? no verse in any version in any language is incorrect?
![]()
What are you getting at? God confused the languages at Babel. He is certainly capable of translating. However, translation of the Bible from Greek and Hebrew into other languages was done by humans, not by God.Is there no verse in the Bible that talks about God translating his word into other languages...?
Or claim to have knowledge themselves which is only accessible to you through learning another language (which in fact they don't know themselves) and using the fact that you're not multilingual as a stick with which to pressure you in to accepting what they (not God) says?
Is there no verse in the Bible that talks about God translating his word into other languages...?
Or claim to have knowledge themselves which is only accessible to you through learning another language (which in fact they don't know themselves) and using the fact that you're not multilingual as a stick with which to pressure you in to accepting what they (not God) says?
Or claim to have knowledge themselves which is only accessible to you through learning another language (which in fact they don't know themselves) and using the fact that you're not multilingual as a stick with which to pressure you in to accepting what they (not God) says?
Matthew 27:9 Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did valueAnother language maybe but knowledge of reasons do help like this below Matt 27:9,, reason once there was just a book called the book of prophets, Jeremiah was the title but actually it was Zachariah all the prophets were placed in that book of Jeremiah thus got a little mistranslated.
Zachariah 11
Thirty Pieces of Silver
…11It was revoked on that day, and so the afflicted of the flock who were watching me knew that it was the word of the LORD. 12Then I told them, “If it seems right to you,give me my wages; but if not, keep them.” So they weighed out my wages, thirty pieces of silver. 13And the LORD said to me, “Throw it to the potter”—this magnificent price at which they valued me. So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them to the potter in the house of the LORD.…
I read your post again and was thinking maybe they meant you just need to read the Hebrew Bible i.e. The OLD testament, to understand the context and meaning, not that you actually have to know the hebrew language itself. Or maybe they meant the Book of Hebrews. But I think the former, because tithing is explained in the OT, not the NT. The Pharisees did tithe their cumin and mint, but its not really explained why they did so.One phrase that is often mooted by those who wish to manipulate or deceive (e.g. tithing) or even somebody who wants to talk you round to their own interpretation of the Bible is
"You've got to read the Hebrew to truly/fully understand the context/meaning".
To people that say this kind of thing, are you suggesting that God was unsuccessful in translating the Bible to other languages, or that God did so incorrectly or not fully?
Matthew 27:9 in Aramaic I think is the only bible translation that does not use the name Jeremiah which IMO is more sound the verse is somewhat complex to translate. so I think at times even some obscure bible version can be a better translation.
Matt 27:9
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Then was fulfilled what was spoken by the Prophet who said, “I took thirty silver coins, the price of The Precious One on which they of the children of Israel had agreed.
Matthew 27:9 Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value
Could it have been written by the prophet Zechariah and spoken by Jeremiah, just as shown in Matt 27:9?
I understand that. Could Jeremiah also have spoken the words?In Zachariah chapter 11 it is Zachariah who speaks.
I understand that. Could Jeremiah also have spoken the words?