Can we just focus on one point?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

vic1980

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
1,653
199
63
44
#61
You assume much.... if that is what YOUR preachers do, then I suggest you change to another church.

This does not happen where I attend.
As a older gentleman that you are, i have respect for you in Christ Jesus our Lord . But why would you reply to me, if clearly you have acknowledge this message is not for you or the congregation in your state ???

Shalom
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#62
Thats good. I agree. Preaching was witnessing. A herald. Proclaiming. In the assembly we have teaching.
I'm inclined to think that 'teaching' would have been the proper translation of 'preaching' in Acts20:9.

Now back to the local assembly. Please explain 1Cor. 12, Romans12, And Ephesians 4. Wheres the sermonizing exect?

Well maybe Strongs Concordance is complete nonsense as you suggest. Now what am i twisting?
Paul was definitely teaching and probably proclaiming things of the kingdom at the same time in Acts 20.

Acts 20:7 (NASB)
[SUP]7 [/SUP] On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to leave the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight. ( You should be calling Paul out of order for not letting you speak what you wanted to say if you were there then...selah )

Paul prolonged his message - sounds like he was doing all the talking and rightly so too because he was teaching them.

As far as 1 Cor 12 - there is a time for each one ministering to others - as I have said to you before it's not either/or - it's the ability to do both - have someone teach and also have others minister to each other. I have been to churches where there was time given for this as well as having a main teaching.

We can do minister to others anytime we meet. You can do that at home with a few friends there too - it doesn't have to be in every service and every time people meet.

Different services have different purposes as led by the Spirit of God.

Romans 12 = simply Paul exhorting the people to exercise their gift to the rest of the body of Christ - nothing that says to only do it in an assembly - that's your "twisting". How in an assembly are they supposed to exercise their "hospitality" to each other or their mercy? ( Romans 12:13 )

See, how you have distorted what Paul was really saying here to make it try to make it line up with your dogmatic stance on every time Christians meet - you need to be able to do what you want?

Eph 4 - is simply saying the same thing as Romans 12 - we need every part functioning in what is their part in the body of Christ. Nothing to do with your man-made doctrine that everyone needs to do what they want in every assembly meeting. They can do their "part" in all kinds of different situations in every instance in living.




 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#63
In old times sinners went to church, however, today they do not as most Christians do not. Then the Cross (which is the gospel) is not presented but some form of psychology. The modern church has lost it's magnet and has become nothing more than a social club, having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof. A party if you will with a little Jesus thrown in. If you have a problem, you are referred to a psychologist or a therapist. No Power from God. Amen

Sad but true, but I do know of unbelievers going to church hearing that still small voice. It happens. I see my pastor struggle at the pulpit sometimes because of deaf ears. I know he prays and prays and each week delivers the message the Lord told him to. But the world has a strong grip on some of the saints. His love for the fold is undeniable. And his sincerity is seen on his worn out knees.
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#64

That is improper interpretation of Acts 6.

The 12 apostles appointed 7 men of honest report to look over part of the ministry so the 12 could give [them]selves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word (Acts 6:3-4).

God blessed the decision and increased His Word, multiplying the number of disciples. Also please note a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith (Acts 6:7).

And please note, one of the seven men appointed was Stephen full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people. Stephen was a wonderful believer. He had no problem with the request of the 12. I will take the acquiescence of Stephen as approval of the decision, notwithstanding your objection.
You missed the whole point. You believe that the head pastor deserves his paycheck right? So in this incident, some were appointed to the needs of the folks and some to the ministry of the word. Do you mean to tell me that these guys that were to wait on tables were happy about losing their pay? I mean only the 'pastor' deserves a check with stipends and full benefits, yet you don't hear one word of complaint out of these other guys.
Why do you suppose? Because those that gave themselves over exclusively to the word, did not negotiate for a salary. Unheard of. In the first century anyway.
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#65
Isn't it funny how the Lord Jesus Himself took His disciples away to rest after ministry and there were also women that gave them money for the Lord's ministry.


Mark 6:31 (NASB)
[SUP]31 [/SUP] And He *said to them, "Come away by yourselves to a secluded place and rest a while." (For there were many people coming and going, and they did not even have time to eat.)

Luke 8:3 (KJV)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance
.

Luke 12:15 has "possessions" as the same Greek word used here for "substance
". These people gave the Lord and His disciples money and other things that belonged to them.

I encourage you to not be taken in by this one dimensional view of ministry and the leaders in the body of Christ. I would save all this judging of the Lord's servants to the Lord Himself.

Paul gave us all some good advice.

Romans 14:4 (NASB)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.





My kind friend. You are just not getting it. Itenerent. Itenetent.itenerent.
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#66
Categorically false.

Simply because there is one paid pulpit preacher, doesn't mean other teaching and ministering doesn't happen anymore. In our church, the preacher preaches a sermon, but that is a small part of the overall happening on Sunday. There are classes being taught, children being taught, group studies for single women, and our elders are all over the place, and constantly available for private discussion and prayer. And that doesn't even count all the one on one discussions and fellowship.

Is it a "perfect" assembly? Of course not... there are none that are. We are all simply believers, meeting together to worship God and encourage/teach/exhort each other.
Categorically misled. You are not facing the truth of His assembly. You are not discerning His nody aright.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#67
Dont give us a whole host of verses endorsing the one single, exalted, titled, salaried executive Pastor/Reverend, just one will do.

Again you are conflating two different ministries. Local elders with traveling preachers/teachers/apostles/missionaries/evangelists. Itenerent.
Your condemnation of all leaders in the body of Christ is really contemptible.

No leader that cared for their flock would allow people in to talk with the people that purposefully disparaged the Lord's leaders in the body of Christ.

You are projecting your bias in the scriptures ( by leaving out all the other scriptures that say to support leaders including the scriptures that showed others suppose the Lord and the disciples with their possessions - ( I suppose Jesus is a hireling now too according to your definition? ) and trying to make isolated cases to try to prove your contempt for leaders in the body of Christ.

This is the reason why so many are against your contempt for pastors and other leaders.

 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
#68
My kind friend. You are just not getting it. Itenerent. Itenetent.itenerent.
Not itenerent.

3This is my defense to those who would examine me. 4Do we not have the right to eat and drink? 5Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife,[SUP]a[/SUP] as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? 6Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living? 7Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk?


8Do I say these things on human authority? Does not the Law say the same? 9For it is written in the Law of Moses, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain.” Is it for oxen that God is concerned? 10Does he not certainly speak for our sake? It was written for our sake, because the plowman should plow in hope and the thresher thresh in hope of sharing in the crop. 11If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we reap material things from you? 12If others share this rightful claim on you, do not we even more?



Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ. 13Do you not know that those who are employed in the temple service get their food from the temple, and those who serve at the altar share in the sacrificial offerings? 14In the same way, the Lord commanded that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living by the gospel.

Peter had this right. And Peter had a wife and was stationed in Jerusalem. What is the right? The right to ask for substance materially in return for substance spiritually. Peter was NOT an itenerent. It was not because Paul traveled that he had the right, but because of the spiritual substance he gave. This is the essence of this entire chapter. Which is why Paul quotes the OT about the Ox not being Muzzled.

You my friend are muzzling the oxes with your interpretation. Paul had the right to not work and he gave it up out of his free choice. This is not a law, but this was his heart.
 
Last edited:

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#69
This issue has been on my heart all week. I think I know where some of the confusion lies.
We need to break down what is happening in the church and who is attending.
There are several things going on at the same time on Sunday mornings. We as saints enter in with thanksgiving and praise (at least I hope we do) but also the door is left open for the unbeliever or the seeker if you will. This issue has not been addressed what about the seeker? The Sunday worship is a different type of assembly it allows the saints to hear the word of God and offers the seeker to hear also. I rarely have seen un believers at bible studies which in my assembly usually occurs Sunday eve and mid week. Which the saints are usually the only attendance. Open discussion and sharing go on in the teaching and study of God's word. Preaching is usually sunday morning because the attendance is different even though it maybe on a certain study it is to bring a message to the people and edify the saints. Study and teaching is to help one learn and draw closer in his or her walk.
The edifying is to be done by the saints. Proof:Ephesians 4:16 From whom the whole body fit together, compacted by what every joint supples, according the effectual working in the measure of EVERY PART, making increase of the body unto the EDIFYING of itsef in love.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#70
Not itenerent.

3This is my defense to those who would examine me. 4Do we not have the right to eat and drink? 5Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife,[SUP]a[/SUP] as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? 6Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living? 7Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk?


8Do I say these things on human authority? Does not the Law say the same? 9For it is written in the Law of Moses, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain.” Is it for oxen that God is concerned? 10Does he not certainly speak for our sake? It was written for our sake, because the plowman should plow in hope and the thresher thresh in hope of sharing in the crop. 11If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we reap material things from you? 12If others share this rightful claim on you, do not we even more?



Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ. 13Do you not know that those who are employed in the temple service get their food from the temple, and those who serve at the altar share in the sacrificial offerings? 14In the same way, the Lord commanded that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living by the gospel.

Peter had this right. And Peter had a wife and was stationed in Jerusalem. What is the right? The right to ask for substance materially in return for substance spiritually. Peter was NOT an itenerent. It was not because Paul traveled that he had the right, but because of the spiritual substance he gave. This is the essence of this entire chapter. Which is why Paul quotes the OT about the Ox not being Muzzled.

You my friend are muzzling the oxes with your interpretation. Paul had the right to not work and he gave it up out of his free choice. This is not a law, but this was his heart.
Well said brother. It's time for us to start having respect for our leaders and to pray for them - not bash them and condemn all of them - no matter what circumstances they are in....even if they are not "doing what we think they should be doing."
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#71
NT doesn't talk percentages. As many as r led of the Spirit, these are the sons of God. So if you r not led of the Spirit, even with giving, you are a 'child' of God, immature, and lacking discernment, being led of greedy men, not by the Holy Spirit.

Who is really your lord and master, Christ or the 'pastor'? Write that check, faster, faster! Sorry, I sometimes kick into the poet thing.
So what if someone is led of God to give to the Church and to pay the pastor for his work such as counseling? Would that be okay for the Pastor to accept that money?
 

vic1980

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
1,653
199
63
44
#72
Isn't it funny how the Lord Jesus Himself took His disciples away to rest after ministry and there were also women that gave them money for the Lord's ministry.


Mark 6:31 (NASB)
[SUP]31 [/SUP] And He *said to them, "Come away by yourselves to a secluded place and rest a while." (For there were many people coming and going, and they did not even have time to eat.)

Luke 8:3 (KJV)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance
.

Luke 12:15 has "possessions" as the same Greek word used here for "substance
". These people gave the Lord and His disciples money and other things that belonged to them.I encourage you to not be taken in by this one dimensional view of ministry and the leaders in the body of Christ. I would save all this judging of the Lord's servants to the Lord Himself.

Paul gave us all some good advice.

Romans 14:4 (NASB)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.





For the worker is worthy of his support , does not mean buy a house for yourself, a 2016 sport car with those offerings, it does not mean go on vacations with those offerings. It does not mean to gather a big percentage of those offerings for yourself, over the rest of the body of Christ.

Return to Matthew 23 and have understanding what this For the worker is worthy of his support means.

The Twelve Disciples; Instructions for Service

1Jesus summoned His twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every kind of disease and every kind of sickness. 2Now the names of the twelve apostles are these: The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; and James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother;3Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; 4Simon the Zealot, and Judas Iscariot, the one who betrayed Him. 5These twelve Jesus sent out after instructing them: “Do not go in the way of theGentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans; 6but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7“And as you go, preach, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven is at hand.’ 8“Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons. Freely you received, freely give. 9“Do not acquire gold, or silver, or copper for your money belts,10or a bag for your journey, or even two coats, or sandals, or a staff; for the worker is worthy of his support. 11“And whatever city or village you enter, inquire who is worthy in it, and stay at his house until you leave that city. 12“As you enter the house, give it your greeting. 13“If the house is worthy, give it your blessing of peace. But if it is not worthy, take back your blessing of peace. 14“Whoever does not receive you, nor heed your words, as you go out of that house or that city, shake the dust off your feet. 15“Truly I say to you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city.

But these instruction was before Jesus went to the cross, yeah uh huh i notice that, then why Paul & John and many other in Christ, travel and in many places they were receive in people homes and so fourth, for the gospel of Jesus Christ.

The offerings are for the body of Christ to be used for the Gospel and helping those that are poor, the widow and the fatherless,

It is all about the Gospel not what you can acquire for self in this life.

If your living for what you can acquire in this world for self , then the Love of the Father is not in you...

freely you are given freely give

Shalom
 
Last edited:

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#73
Yes, he did say that, but you are taking it out of context. He wasn't speaking of "preachers", he was talking to ALL of us... warning us of the sin of pride and arrogance. We are to be humble, and not seek to be "exalted".

While it COULD apply to some preachers, it could also apply to ANY of us.
Honorific religious titles. Do you wear one? I don't. Rabbi, master, teacher.all in the religious sense. So you say its us. How would that work? And if it does not mean Reverend Ike or Pastor Bob, just how does that apply to us mere laity.?
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#74
I did read far enough and I have read other scriptures too.
To extrapolate to say that Paul told all of them to get jobs is violating the other scriptures that talk about "having the right to obtain support from those that are being preached to". You are taking an instance where Paul led by example in this case to help the weak and making it a dogmatic doctrine - which doesn't stand up with the other scriptural references.

Not only that but unfortunately you are making it "your ministry" to try to make others see your dogmatic doctrine as truth for all circumstances.

Again you are doing nothing but maligning good hearted loving leaders in the body of Christ because you are painting them all with the same brush and calling them hirelings. You can try to "justify" your malice all you want but to put all leaders in the same boat is just plain spiritual ignorance and very unwise and damaging to your brothers and sisters in the Lord.

That is what is really ungodly and Jesus in Matt 23:12 says that those that exalt themselves shall be humbled which is good advice for all of us no matter what our part is in the body of Christ.
Do you know the difference between the local elders and the traveling preachers? You r wearing me down my friend.
 

vic1980

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
1,653
199
63
44
#76
Do you know the difference between the local elders and the traveling preachers? You r wearing me down my friend.
Until they actually get to study on this topic , they will not have understanding :(

That is why i pray for those brother & sisters, that have not study this subject in depth, on the matter at hand.

Shalom
 
Last edited:

vic1980

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
1,653
199
63
44
#78
Not itenerent.

3This is my defense to those who would examine me. 4Do we not have the right to eat and drink? 5Do we not have the right to take along a believing wife,[SUP]a[/SUP] as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? 6Or is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living? 7Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk?


8Do I say these things on human authority? Does not the Law say the same? 9For it is written in the Law of Moses, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain.” Is it for oxen that God is concerned? 10Does he not certainly speak for our sake? It was written for our sake, because the plowman should plow in hope and the thresher thresh in hope of sharing in the crop. 11If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we reap material things from you? 12If others share this rightful claim on you, do not we even more?



Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ. 13Do you not know that those who are employed in the temple service get their food from the temple, and those who serve at the altar share in the sacrificial offerings? 14In the same way, the Lord commanded that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living by the gospel.

Peter had this right. And Peter had a wife and was stationed in Jerusalem. What is the right? The right to ask for substance materially in return for substance spiritually. Peter was NOT an itenerent. It was not because Paul traveled that he had the right, but because of the spiritual substance he gave. This is the essence of this entire chapter. Which is why Paul quotes the OT about the Ox not being Muzzled.

You my friend are muzzling the oxes with your interpretation. Paul had the right to not work and he gave it up out of his free choice. This is not a law, but this was his heart.
Let us discuss what this means - is it too much if we reap material things from you?

what are these material things that he is speaking upon.

is it food water , cloth , rent a house for the preaching of the Gospel. - Acts 28:30

or is it , buy a house, buy a plane, buy a island for self and preach about a diffrent gospel.- could not find it in the Holy Scriptures.

what do those material things really mean hmmm...

Shalom
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
#79
You guys accuse me of twisting the word. I must say that i have not seen this much twisting you guys are doing since Chubby Checker hit the American Bandstand.

And you still have not produced that mysterious critter the Executive Pastor in the confines of the NT. I got it. I got it. He's probably away on another vacation. Check the missions work you see!

Gotta take a break you each only have to write one post at a time. I have to write about 15.
 
Last edited:
R

RobbyEarl

Guest
#80
Yall crazy, just imagine if an unbeliever happened across this thread. What would you think?