faith alone?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
#61
I already showed you in post #595 in the Conditional Salvation thread. Now we are back to post #618 in that thread - I have already answered your questions. There is just no getting through to you. :( I feel like I'm talking to the wall.

I never said that God commanded man to Spirit baptize. I have already explained the truth to you about faith and works numerous times but in your delusional world of unbelief you just don't get it.
your teaching is false...this is the truth...the devil believe and tremble ...you just believe...but you can believe until you are blue...if you don't repent and get baptised for the remission of sins you cannot enter the kingdom....
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
#62
Luke 3:7-9King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
[SUP]8 [/SUP]Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
[SUP]9 [/SUP]And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree therefore which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

faith comes by hearing...if that cannot bear fruit when you hear and believe... you are lost until you start bearing bro....if you do not do what you hear and believe how can you to be saved? you want to hear and believe and not obey what you hear...because you follow a doctrine of man that says you are saved when you believe...scripture says devils believe and tremble...you want to believe and do nothing...to be saved....then you will do....satan is feeding you the same old lie...."you will not surly die"...and you are swallowing it hook line and sinker....
thank bro for bring it up.

1. these people are doing what you call obedience, come to be baptize with water. That is what you call obedience, isn't it?

When people come to John and wont to be baptize, John refuse.

let analyze together brother:
a. you said to be baptize with water is obedience, why John mad to the obedience people?
b. If I am correct, You said baptize is a gate to heaven, why John close the gate for them?

In my opinion is that water baptize is just symbol Not going to do any good for salvation if a person not baptize or immerse in the Father Son and Holy spirit symbolized in water. If this water baptism is a gate to heaven, than how cruel John is to refused people going to heaven by refused to baptize them.

So water baptism is only symbol brother.

2. Do you want to say before water baptism must repent first?

That I agree, but to bare the fruit you must abide to the vine /have a faith in Jesus. I give you an analogy of the bus. If you don't trust the bus will bring you to you destination safely why you jump into that bus.

I trust Jesus will bring me to heaven and I abide to Him, before I bare fruit. I trust Him that I am don't have capacity to bear the fruit in my own.

John did not say that they are have ability to bear the fruit of repentance by them self, if he did than he(John) accused Jesus as a liar. John Agree with Jesus that no one able to bear the fruit of itself.

John just say that they faith in God is not genuine,

what John the baptize said is like what Jesus said : the tree seen by it fruit. or James when he said show me your faith with your word and I will show you my faith with the work. And the same with apostle John when he said, if one say he love the Lord but not love his neighbor, he is a liar.

Not that we have to bear the fruit first before being accept as a Christ follower.

Let me repeat to make it clear brother.

Jesus, not me. said branch can't bear fruit of itself.

If the requirement before being accept as Jesus follower is to show the fruit of repentance, than no body accepted.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#63
I do not depend upon myself at all. This should be quite obvious as I have not stated a couple times that I could not redeem myself or save myself through any means. Grace is God's gift to us. It is only by God and from God that we could receive this gift. Justification is only by the blood of Christ as only His blood can make us "as righteous" before God. Sanctification can only be accomplished through the work of the Holy Spirit indwelling in us.

If you all want to add your "accomplishments" whether it be by "water" baptism or by any works you do then that's on you. It's not only non Biblical but it's not truth. You take God and reduce Him to fit in your box to what you want. You are not God and you never will be. Nothing you do will save you, add to your righteousness or bring you closer to God.

God draws us to Him. If it wasn't for God's grace we would all be doomed to hell.

Until you put God first you will never be at peace with God.

Now tell me again how I am "dependant upon my own personal ability".
 
E

elf3

Guest
#64
When someone is caught in a lie what is the first thing they do? They make excuses.

I gave you a definition of "grace". You said it was probably written by "so and so" that definition didn't conform to the RC. As if the RC has authority above God and the Bible.

You then excuse anything I quite from another theologian. As it was written by "so and so".

You then excuse any interpretation of the Bible as "your own understanding".

Your excuses for seeing truth are wearing thin.

As for newbirth..yep I agreed that our faith should be shown by our works but you won't understand that it's our faith not our works that save.

You both, cassian and newbirth, want to add to the blood of Christ by baptism or works. Basically you are saying the blood of Christ isn't enough so I better do something to help.

And you say I "depend upon myself"? No actually and obviously it's who who "depends upon yourself".
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
#65
thank bro for bring it up.

1. these people are doing what you call obedience, come to be baptize with water. That is what you call obedience, isn't it?

When people come to John and wont to be baptize, John refuse.
he never close any door... he is just saying repentance must come before baptism



let analyze together brother:
a. you said to be baptize with water is obedience, why John mad to the obedience people?
why did you leave out repent??/




b. If I am correct, You said baptize is a gate to heaven, why John close the gate for them?
because if they did not repent..it is just a bath...




In my opinion is that water baptize is just symbol Not going to do any good for salvation if a person not baptize or immerse in the Father Son and Holy spirit symbolized in water. If this water baptism is a gate to heaven, than how cruel John is to refused people going to heaven by refused to baptize them.

So water baptism is only symbol brother.
if it were just a symbol then John had nothing to worry about....but since it is for the remission of sin and entrance into the kingdom then he must warn people how serious it is...







2. Do you want to say before water baptism must repent first?

That I agree, but to bare the fruit you must abide to the vine /have a faith in Jesus. I give you an analogy of the bus. If you don't trust the bus will bring you to you destination safely why you jump into that bus.

I trust Jesus will bring me to heaven and I abide to Him, before I bare fruit. I trust Him that I am don't have capacity to bear the fruit in my own.
faith comes by hearing .....if you trust the bus, do you not have to follow all the instruction before you get on...you have to get your token....you want it to be different with Christ...Christ say you must repent and be baptised...



John did not say that they are have ability to bear the fruit of repentance by them self, if he did than he(John) accused Jesus as a liar. John Agree with Jesus that no one able to bear the fruit of itself.

John just say that they faith in God is not genuine,
that is following simple instructions....you can liken it to bearing fruit...but it is obeying the word

what John the baptize said is like what Jesus said : the tree seen by it fruit. or James when he said show me your faith with your word and I will show you my faith with the work. And the same with apostle John when he said, if one say he love the Lord but not love his neighbor, he is a liar.
you are confusing yourself by mixing scripture taken out of context...

Not that we have to bear the fruit first before being accept as a Christ follower.

Let me repeat to make it clear brother.

Jesus, not me. said branch can't bear fruit of itself.

If the requirement before being accept as Jesus follower is to show the fruit of repentance, than no body accepted.
faith comes by hearing ....if you believe what you hear ...then you obey....repentance and baptism are not f fruits..they are instructions for those who believe....that is how you enter the kingdom....you want to get on the bus without a token...
Mark 6:11-13King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP]And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]And they went out, and preached that men should repent.

[SUP]13 [/SUP]And they cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
#66
I do not depend upon myself at all. This should be quite obvious as I have not stated a couple times that I could not redeem myself or save myself through any means. Grace is God's gift to us. It is only by God and from God that we could receive this gift. Justification is only by the blood of Christ as only His blood can make us "as righteous" before God. Sanctification can only be accomplished through the work of the Holy Spirit indwelling in us.

If you all want to add your "accomplishments" whether it be by "water" baptism or by any works you do then that's on you. It's not only non Biblical but it's not truth. You take God and reduce Him to fit in your box to what you want. You are not God and you never will be. Nothing you do will save you, add to your righteousness or bring you closer to God.

God draws us to Him. If it wasn't for God's grace we would all be doomed to hell.

Until you put God first you will never be at peace with God.

Now tell me again how I am "dependant upon my own personal ability".
in other words you cannot refute the meaning of scripture from the beginning. You need to rely upon your man made theories and personal interpretations.

Every sola scripturist is dependent on his best intellectual accmen to deduce from a text that has been stripped of its original meaning, and a new construct is developed based on their best suppositions. There are hundreds to choose from. From Luther to the latest New Revelation. You are just one of hundreds.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#67
in other words you cannot refute the meaning of scripture from the beginning. You need to rely upon your man made theories and personal interpretations.

Every sola scripturist is dependent on his best intellectual accmen to deduce from a text that has been stripped of its original meaning, and a new construct is developed based on their best suppositions. There are hundreds to choose from. From Luther to the latest New Revelation. You are just one of hundreds.
Dude my evidence is the Word of God.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oct 24, 2014
595
14
0
#68
Hebrews 11:1: “Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” Isn't faith the very 1st "stepping stone" in Christianity? Without it there is no Christian Religion..there is no God..so isn't it the umbrella of all christian things and everything else, the bible and everything there within falls under faith, without faith we would not believe in these things..am I thinking too simply?


No. In fact, you are the wisest one in here my dear :)
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
#69
When someone is caught in a lie what is the first thing they do? They make excuses.

I gave you a definition of "grace". You said it was probably written by "so and so" that definition didn't conform to the RC. As if the RC has authority above God and the Bible.

You then excuse anything I quite from another theologian. As it was written by "so and so".

You then excuse any interpretation of the Bible as "your own understanding".

Your excuses for seeing truth are wearing thin.

As for newbirth..yep I agreed that our faith should be shown by our works but you won't understand that it's our faith not our works that save.

You both, cassian and newbirth, want to add to the blood of Christ by baptism or works. Basically you are saying the blood of Christ isn't enough so I better do something to help.

And you say I "depend upon myself"? No actually and obviously it's who who "depends upon yourself".
Give me a good reason why I should believe you over other persons, such as Smith, Hubbard, Eddy, Fox, Campbell, and a host of others including Luther and Calvin? They all depend on their personal interpretations to determine what scripture means. Why would yours be better or more accurate? All you have done is either explained some other man's interpretation or added your own opinion to it.

Show that what you believe is actually from the beginning and is the Gospel that is being preserved by the Holy Spirit. You cannot even show that yours is better and more accurate than Smiths or anyone else. They are all using the very same method as you.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#70
Give me a good reason why I should believe you over other persons, such as Smith, Hubbard, Eddy, Fox, Campbell, and a host of others including Luther and Calvin? They all depend on their personal interpretations to determine what scripture means. Why would yours be better or more accurate? All you have done is either explained some other man's interpretation or added your own opinion to it.

Show that what you believe is actually from the beginning and is the Gospel that is being preserved by the Holy Spirit. You cannot even show that yours is better and more accurate than Smiths or anyone else. They are all using the very same method as you.
I have given you Biblical proof so far in Romans, 1 Cor and John so far and you made an excuse for each one so far. I can't give you more than Biblical proof unless you want more writings from other people you can refuse.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#71
Give me a good reason why I should believe you over other persons, such as Smith, Hubbard, Eddy, Fox, Campbell, and a host of others including Luther and Calvin? They all depend on their personal interpretations to determine what scripture means. Why would yours be better or more accurate? All you have done is either explained some other man's interpretation or added your own opinion to it.

Show that what you believe is actually from the beginning and is the Gospel that is being preserved by the Holy Spirit. You cannot even show that yours is better and more accurate than Smiths or anyone else. They are all using the very same method as you.
Besides the assumption that yours is correct huh? As if you know more than anyone else? And besides I don't just look at one person and say it's "truth". I see what others might have said and then check it with Biblical truth all the while praying for understanding and guidance by the Holy Spirit. And yep some things I thought as true were actually wrong once I "proofed" it against the Bible. But on some things I found I had a correct understanding as shown to me by the Holy Spirit not by my own understanding.

I will not say I know it all or understand more than others but I only know what God has shown me. It's not me or anyone else you "must" believe but only God's Word. If you believe your correct then so be it. Only the Holy Spirit can show you truth.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#72
Give me a good reason why I should believe you over other persons, such as Smith, Hubbard, Eddy, Fox, Campbell, and a host of others including Luther and Calvin? They all depend on their personal interpretations to determine what scripture means. Why would yours be better or more accurate? All you have done is either explained some other man's interpretation or added your own opinion to it.

Show that what you believe is actually from the beginning and is the Gospel that is being preserved by the Holy Spirit. You cannot even show that yours is better and more accurate than Smiths or anyone else. They are all using the very same method as you.
Besides if I didn't believe I was right I wouldnt try and defend it. And it seems what I believe is Biblical so therefore I WILL defend my stance.

Where do your beliefs come from? Who told you what to say? Seeing how you mention the RC I think that might have some influence.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
#73
Mark 6:11-13King James Version (KJV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP]And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]And they went out, and preached that men should repent.

[SUP]13 [/SUP]And they cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them.

Brother Newbirth

This is what you said

1. faith comes by hearing ....2if you believe what you hear ...3 then you obey....4 repentance and baptism are not f fruits..they are instructions for those who believe....that is how you enter the kingdom....you want to get on the bus without a token...


Let dissect your statement above.

1. faith comes by hearing

Say you hear that Jesus is the savior and whoever believe in Him will be save.

2. if you believe what you hear

You said if you believe what you hear. Hear about how to save by believe in Jesus am I correct?.

Let me ask you question brother, If you believe what you hear mean you have a faith and if you don't believe what your hear than you don't have a faith, am I correct?

3. .then you obey...

It mean you believe obey is after have a faith in Jesus Am I correct. This is your own statement brother.

4 repentance and baptism are not f fruits..they are instructions for those who believe....that is how you enter the kingdom....you want to get on the bus without a token...

A.Then you said water baptism is token not a fruit. Can people repent before having a faith in Jesus. Your own map show hear, believe/faith than obey than repent and baptize.

B. You know that Muslim don't believe in baptism in Jesus name, and don't believe in baptism at all. Why you religion say Muslim is include in the plan of salvation because adore the same God with your religion.

So baptism is token for Muslim too or only for catholic?
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#74
The truth is that love will be the only thing that will go on forever and ever,and that is why the Bible says that out of faith,hope,and charity,which is love in action and not only in word,that love is the greatest,and that is because faith and hope are only needed in this world,and when we are united with Jesus,faith and hope are no longer needed,but love will go on forever and ever,which from this earth only love will remain with us forever.We will only carry love with us when we leave this earth.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
#75
I have given you Biblical proof so far in Romans, 1 Cor and John so far and you made an excuse for each one so far. I can't give you more than Biblical proof unless you want more writings from other people you can refuse.
And you don't think that Calvin used scripture, or Eddy, or Russell used scripture. They interpreted scripture the same way you do and come up with different interpretations. Obviously, it is not scripture at fault, but man's inept ability to interpret a text, 2000 years after the Revelation was given and to men that were never taught the Gospel in the first place.

If what you believe is from the beginning then you have found Truth. Can you show that the Holy Spirit has preserved your interpretation from the beginning, that it has never changed from the beginning, has always been understood the same from the beginning? If not, how can it be the Gospel. The Holy Spirit gave God's revelation to man in the beginning and promised to preserve it within His Body to the end of time. One can either accept the Gospel once given or can take a text and formulate some philosophical ideas from it to develop a personal form of salvation. Where is that notion found in scripture?
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
#76
Besides the assumption that yours is correct huh? As if you know more than anyone else? And besides I don't just look at one person and say it's "truth". I see what others might have said and then check it with Biblical truth all the while praying for understanding and guidance by the Holy Spirit. And yep some things I thought as true were actually wrong once I "proofed" it against the Bible. But on some things I found I had a correct understanding as shown to me by the Holy Spirit not by my own understanding.
I would say that the Holy Spirit is not very reliable then as well as a liar.
He stated that He gave it ONCE, completely, for all time or all men and would preserve it.
Now you say that is no so. The Holy Spirit is giving you whole new revelation, much different than He gave in the beginning. It also happens to be the same claim all the other sola scripturist use and they come up with different interpretations. Hardly the work of the Holy Spirit. Or at least not the one of scripture.

I will not say I know it all or understand more than others but I only know what God has shown me. It's not me or anyone else you "must" believe but only God's Word. If you believe your correct then so be it. Only the Holy Spirit can show you truth.
That is what all sola scripturist have stated now for 500 years. Don't listen to men. The ONLY man you should listen to is yourself. Whatever idealogy you create from scripture is valid. After all, it is based on scripture.

The Holy Spirit leads one to the Truth. He will not give the Truth all over in bits and pieces nor will He give it separately to individuals. Why would you even need scripture if you are getting direct revelation from the Holy Spirit. You might as well write your own book as did Calvin, Smith, [FONT=Arial, sans-serif] Van Summers and a few others.

I don't know more than anyone else. I did the work of the Berean and found that the Church Christ founded at Pentecost is still present in this world today and that the Gospel entrusted to it is still the very same Gospel. unchanged. Just as he promised in scripture.[/FONT]
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
#77
Besides if I didn't believe I was right I wouldnt try and defend it. And it seems what I believe is Biblical so therefore I WILL defend my stance.

Where do your beliefs come from? Who told you what to say? Seeing how you mention the RC I think that might have some influence.
I was taught by the Church once I entered that Church. Taught as the early Christians were taught by the Apostles and subsequent generations were taught the same unchanging Gospel by the Church, whose Head is Christ and is enlivened by the Holy Spirit. I am not RC, but Orthodox. The RC is in the same quagmire as Protestants. Even before the Reformation they were developing their own brand of salvation since they separated from the One True Church. Protestants simply substituted themselves as individuals becoming their own Pope and church. Then interpreted, and created whole new ideas from a text.

Mormonism is as biblical as any other man's self imposed interpretation. Even Urantia, as far fetched as it is, still is based on scripture.
 
E

elf3

Guest
#78
Huh now I am the only one who believes this? Have you even looked at the Scripture myself and others have presented to you? I am not the only one that has shown you the passages I presented here and on other forums. I am not the only one who has disputed you with the same conclusion. It just happens that I am the only one here right now you can argue with. You have stated untrue ideas where you have been proven wrong yet you cling to your "ideas" because your church taught you. Since you state that I guess your "church" knows best huh? Are they above the Word of God? Are they even close to God's equal? At least I admitted I don't know everything. You? Yeah I bet you believe you do know everything.

And as far as my beliefs..yeah they happen to align with what others have written. You take my beliefs back to the reformation with luther and Calvin. Well how about a couple others? Augustine or Aquinus perhaps? And not only that but the reformation wasn't based just upon one human but upon the Word of God. Would you like to argue the main points of the reformation? I mean if you want we could argue the T.U.L.I.P. or we could perhaps go through a whole Systematic Theology book?

You say I'm wrong well sorry I have seen your "interpretation" of Scripture and yeah its a bit off by what I have seen so far.

You want to know some of the other writers I read? Packer, Sproul, MacArthur, Pink, Lewis, Stott, Strobel, Geisler, Bonhoeffer, Little, Barclay, Spurgeon just to name a couple. So since I agree with most of them I guess they are wrong too?
 
A

Angelmommie

Guest
#79
[h=3]John 6:28-29[/h]Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.” ...comes back to Faith...
 
E

elf3

Guest
#80
One reason some people don't like reformed theology is because it has God in control where He is and should be. People add baptism as part of salvation or works as part of our salvation so we "feel" we have control. Does God owe us anything? Nope so why do we feel the need to add to His work. And I better add (for certain people) that our faith in God will be shown through our good works.

Grace is given by God the Father

Justification is through the blood of Jesus

Sanctification is worked in us by the Holy Spirit

God in control...not us!