Who are the sons of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

Abiding

Guest
#41
Im not socially concerned about it one way or the other.
Both views on this are acceptable to me. But there are
problems with both views. The angel crossbreeding has the
least problems..accept the whole thought of it.
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#42
I see what you are saying but, the angles were held in chains under darkness until judgment, even as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by fire. The sins of these two groups have nothing to do with one another the like manner was as I said Sodom,, Gomorrah, and the cities around them

It is showing what happens to those who believe not by giving examples, cause Jude speaks of other things as well
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#43
I see what you are saying but, the angles were held in chains under darkness until judgment, even as Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by fire. The sins of these two groups have nothing to do with one another the like manner was as I said Sodom,, Gomorrah, and the cities around them
Im not trying to win in this...it matters little to me...but chains for Angels...yes
but not dead humans....so the like manner couldnt be refering to that...try again.:)
Its better to read it in context. you know that.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#44
It makes sense to me to exterminate an entire world....and after those days...entire nations
of weird 6 fingered giants...if they were a unredeemable crossbred people.
But im ok with another view also. Because i just dont know. Ive done all the homework
that can be done. And the weird view fits best. But i havnt enough clear scripture to say
its correct.
 
Last edited:
L

Laodicea

Guest
#45
Im not trying to win in this...it matters little to me...but chains for Angels...yes
but not dead humans....so the like manner couldnt be refering to that...try again.:)
Its better to read it in context. you know that.
Even as could be referring to the great judgement day not chains of darkness.
Jude 1:6-7
(6) And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
(7) Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.



 
A

Abiding

Guest
#46
Even as could be referring to the great judgement day not chains of darkness.
Jude 1:6-7
(6) And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
(7) Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.



could very well be...but it doesnt read well that way. In fact it reads all weird if that was the point.

in like manner giving themselves over to fornication
 
Last edited:
L

Laodicea

Guest
#47
could very well be...but it doesnt read well that way. In fact it reads all weird if that was the point.
Verse 7 is talking about judgement and the last thing mentioned in verse 6 is judgement. What are your thoughts?
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#48
Verse 7 is talking about judgement and the last thing mentioned in verse 6 is judgement. What are your thoughts?
true...very true. But if read never having a view...i think one would naturally by the use of language relate as i see that it does. Believe me i dont like this creepy view...it fits with History...it makes sense of the judgements. But even tho its seems the crossbreed view makes the most sense...i just dont know. Nor do i like it.
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#49
true...very true. But if read never having a view...i think one would naturally by the use of language relate as i see that it does. Believe me i dont like this creepy view...it fits with History...it makes sense of the judgements. But even tho its seems the crossbreed view makes the most sense...i just dont know. Nor do i like it.
Abiding, nobody likes that, but you are correct with this view, if you really research it truthfully and apologetically and even logically, it all comes together. People just can't handle the idea of the spiritual realm crashing into the natural this way. Many people nowadays rather totally shut their eyes and ears to the spiritual realm, because it is to "spooky" for them, but the Bible commands us to know and to specifically know our enemies and their schemes.
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#50
This is the meaning of the word sons in Genesis 6:2:-
H1121
בּן
bên
bane
From H1129; a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etc., (like H1, H251, etc.): - + afflicted, age, [Ahoh-] [Ammon-] [Hachmon-] [Lev-]ite, [anoint-]ed one, appointed to, (+) arrow, [Assyr-] [Babylon-] [Egypt-] [Grec-]ian, one born, bough, branch, breed, + (young) bullock, + (young) calf, X came up in, child, colt, X common, X corn, daughter, X of first, + firstborn, foal, + very fruitful, + postage, X in, + kid, + lamb, (+) man, meet, + mighty, + nephew, old, (+) people, + rebel, + robber, X servant born, X soldier, son, + spark, + steward, + stranger, X surely, them of, + tumultuous one, + valiant[-est], whelp, worthy, young (one), youth.

It is not translated as angel

We have to go at this logically and apologetically: of course the word sons just means sons, nobody is countering that. But it's not just one word here, it's a whole different meaning of what kind of sons are we talking about. You have to look at the whole term - sons of God (OT), meaning here directly created by God not through women, in the NT it also means born of God or born again believers.
If you put another term there, e.g. son of the devil (as in Acts 10:13), you have a spiritual connotation which does not directly refer to anything created in the natural but spiritual in this case, even though it might refer to a person in which this spiritual relationship is created.

BTW you quoted the wrong Strongs number there, which means building up or to built, to make -not sons
This is the actual reference:
Strong's H1121 - ben
בֵּן
Transliteration = ben
1) son, grandson, child, member of a group
a) son, male child
b) grandson
c) children (pl. - male and female)
d) youth, young men (pl.)
e) young (of animals)
f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]
g) people (of a nation) (pl.)
h) of lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.)
i) a member of a guild, order, class


There you see, it's proof in the original meaning of the texts as well as the ones I gave you before from Job where CLEARLY a scene in heaven is mentioned, where the sons of God come together, as other Bible translations also point out using "the angels" there. This is correct proof, what more do you need? Unless you don't want to see it on purpose. Since you have not even answered these posts and scriptures I gave before, but keep arguing against this whole subject as if avoiding them.
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#51
Devils are fallen angels
Revelation 12:7-9
(7) And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
(8) And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
(9) And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

Isaiah 14:12
(12) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!


Where does it say that? Not in the scriptures you mentioned!
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#52
Where does it say that? Not in the scriptures you mentioned!
Satan the devil fell from heaven that is what the Bible says in these verses and his angels fell with him
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#53
Originally Posted by notIbutChrist
I agree with everything you have said Laodicia, and just to mention, in Genesis 6 it never even calls the giants or ''Nephilim'' the children of the union between sons of God, and daughters of man. Their children were actually the renown men, not the giants.


That is true, everything lived longer and was bigger before the flood
. As I said before concerning the book of Enoch that Genesis 6 happened after Enoch was taken to heaven so how could he write about it if he was not around?
This just makes no sense and contradicts each other? Then who where the giants (they didn't have football back then:D)? Either everything is bigger or only some of it is but it can't be both?!
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#54
Satan the devil fell from heaven that is what the Bible says in these verses and his angels fell with him
I understand that but you have not proven that the fallen angels all of a sudden and magically turned into devils or demons (daimonion).
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#55
I understand that but you have not proven that the fallen angels all of a sudden and magically turned into devils or demons (daimonion).
Maybe you have your mindset and don't want to believe it?
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#56
Even as could be referring to the great judgement day not chains of darkness.
Jude 1:6-7
(6) And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
(7) Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.



One thing you have not mentioned yet:
Who do you think these angels are in Jude 6 and what was their proper domain, their first estate, what is "leaving their own habitation, abode"?
 
W

Warrior777

Guest
#57
Maybe you have your mindset and don't want to believe it?
I have not shared a mindset but biblical proof, whereas you haven't so far but just voiced speculations and assumptions. You have to go back to scripture and compare, it has to line up with what it says throughout the word, the context and the situation at hand, the nature of God, people, creation, the time lines, etc...
 
L

Laodicea

Guest
#58
I have not shared a mindset but biblical proof, whereas you haven't so far but just voiced speculations and assumptions. You have to go back to scripture and compare, it has to line up with what it says throughout the word, the context and the situation at hand, the nature of God, people, creation, the time lines, etc...
You have just voiced speculations and assumptions. Go back to scripture and compare, it has to line up with what it says throughout the word.
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#59
ummm i'm going to be an odd ball and not agree completely with either of your readings of Jude or at least what has been stated so far because it doesn't quite make sense to me...Quite simply for me this passage is a list of types of sins and transgressions that anger God. they don't compare to each other but highlight various sins that people and even angels tend to indulge themselves in that rebel against God's commandments.

if you want to learn the tactics of the enemy and how he attacks people study the list and you will see it replay itself in your life and in the lives of those around you every day. do not be ignorant of the tactics of the enemy.

1. attack on their faith, destruction of those in unbelief
2. move beyond the authority and bounds that God has placed around you and your life, like Adam and Eve when they ate the forbidden fruit and the angels when they got humans to worship them.
3 sexual immorality: well most know that one and if you don't ask your parents.
4. gossip and slander, there are a lot of verses about taming your tongue and if you do not then your religion is vain and useless.
5. Cain, Balaam, Korah: judging the world by the flesh and disdaining things of the Spirit and of GOD: counting the things of God worthless and chasing and defiling themselves with things of this world and their base desires and not having hearts seeking GOD and His will but a corrupt heart seeking food, money and power instead.


Jude
5 But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. 6 And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; 7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

8 Likewise also these dreamers defile the flesh, reject authority, and speak evil of dignitaries. 9 Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!” 10 But these speak evil of whatever they do not know; and whatever they know naturally, like brute beasts, in these things they corrupt themselves. 11 Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah.


anyways that is how I read the passage.
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#60
who are the sons of God?

I can't answer for the OT(still studying and praying about it) but the new says those who have the Holy Spirit in them have the right to cry forth as "Abba, Father"

I believe that all the generations of men had that right but it was lost when the people rejected God and demanded that Samuel place a King over them and maybe even before that when the people demanded that Moses be a prophet for them instead of directly speak to God as GOD wished from the beginning to walk amongst His people but the people were ashamed and hid and still hide behind spiritual fig leaves and veils trying to cover upon and deny their sin and their rebellion.

mmm I think I'll go read Exodus now. ttyl.