Anyone who read your post would have seen it in terms of temporal PC logic... I tried to show you that error and make a biblical point about Christ teaching things based on His eternal truth and Word..not modern left-wing propaganda. The reason you understand "God is no respecter of persons" is because its biblical..based on Christ and His covenant. Under the OLD covenant (which the Jews was under) God called the Gentiles defiled and "dogs" according to the law. To leave that out of the discussion is to miss the eternal truth you "now" claim you was trying to uphold.
To take it even further, In the verse where Jesus said: Matthew 15:26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
The word, "dogs" is defined by Strong's coming from the root word:
2965 // kuwn // kuon // koo'-ohn //
a root word; TDNT - 3:1101,; n m
AV - dog 5; 5
1) a dog
2) metaph. a man of impure mind, an impudent man
That being compared to what Paul said about the carnal mind.
Romans 8:7 Because the
carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
4561 // sarx // sarx // sarx //
probably from the base of 4563 ; TDNT - 7:98,1000; n f
AV - flesh 147, carnal 2, carnally minded + 5427 1, fleshly 1; 151
1) flesh (the soft substance of the living body, which covers
the bones and is permeated with blood) of both man and beasts
2) the body
2a) the body of a man
2b) used of natural or physical origin, generation or
relationship
2b1) born of natural generation
2c) the sensuous nature of man, "the animal nature"
2c1) without any suggestion of depravity
2c2) the animal nature with cravings which incite to sin
2c3) the physical nature of man as subject to suffering
3) a living creature (because possessed of a body of flesh)
whether man or beast
4) the flesh, denotes mere human nature, the earthly nature of man apart
from divine influence, and therefore prone to sin and opposed to God
We're all fortunate to even receive crumbs from the Master's table.