Contrast of The Mega Church with the Bible Believing Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
So you're going to spend more time slandering . . .

Wouldn't your time be better spent building up the Body of Christ here?

I guess that's just not your thing . . .

So sad.

An Illustration from Real Life
I went to a Baptist high school for five years (it was in the fundamentalist stream of Baptist, GARBC) that regularly chided and joked about the 'liberal church down the road', a 'Bible Church', which also happened to be my home church. It was in no way a 'liberal' church - its doctrine was (and I assume still is - I have not lived in that town for many years now, but the church is still there and thriving) very sound.

The Baptist church would fit nicely into the template of the right side of the column of the OP - it did all the 'right' things.

The Bible Church would mostly fit into that template, as well, though over time, since these churches are in a town with both a major university and a fine arts college, the Bible Church began to reach out to the college community (or 'cater to' as you might proclaim) in ways relevant to them. They were good, decent people, their morality being the Fruit of who they were in Christ, demonstrated in how they loved those around them.

A really interesting thing about the Bible Church was the cultural diversity there. There were college students, college professors, educators from the local community, farmers, and others who were just regular folks from around the area. Yet the Gospel proved to be the uniting factor across all of those demographics - Christ was the center and the focus, and it WORKED.

The Bible Church grew and grew, needing to add onto their existing building and go to multiple services. They churned out people who were New Creations in Christ and were loving others well, drawing those in their spheres of influence into the Kingdom with their gentleness and care. Another really interesting and really cool thing is that there were many international students who went to that Bible Church for the duration of their studies at university, grew and matured in Christ, and then went back to their home countries taking Christ with them! The fruit of that Bible Church is far-reaching - global, in fact!

The Baptist church was stagnant. The community was cliquish, rarely inviting outsiders into their midst. The young folks went because they knew there would be hell to pay if they didn't. Many of them had children out of wedlock; few of those who married had marriages that survived. And others did leave - their faith shipwrecked by extra-biblical demands of how church 'should' be, though the doctrine preached from the pulpit was basically sound.

Though the doctrine was basically sound, how they walked out their day-to-day lives was devoid of love. They preached focus on Christ, but then instructed focus on self - do this, don't do that - and all it bred was rebellion. One of my classmates told me that her mother was forbidden by her dad to hang clothes out on the line on Sunday for fear that others who went to their church who lived on their road would see that she was working on the Lord's Day. She was permitted to use the dryer, however :rolleyes:. And these were sweet people - I loved them! But their motivation was not Christ and love-centered, it was fear based. That friend, btw, has left her husband and her faith in favor of New Agey stuff. Of the three children in that family, 2 of the 3 have divorced and left the faith that their family brought them up in.

The judgmentalism in that Baptist church was palpable. Constant scrutiny and an encompassing critical spirit . . . the results - the fruit - is not good. I know several of the walking wounded today and it breaks my heart. I try to be an encouragement to them, but so much damage has been done. The school no longer exists; it died a natural death.

What's important in a church is not style or culture. What's important in a church is that people are being pointed to Christ and His Work and that they are well-loved, because those two things transcend style and culture. That they are being taught the Good News of His Work and all that that means to us and for us is what matters. If a church is pointing to Christ and loving each other and others well, then Christ has a way of working out the kinks and details as long as the inflexible people are willing to get out of HIS way! The results? Local bodies of believers who are overflowing with the Love and Good News of Christ!

So many look for the 'correct formula' for 'doing' church.

The only formula is the Good News of the Work of Christ, learning how to love people well, and then letting HIM fashion each local body into what's needed in their communities.

By trying to simplify and provide a consistent method of worship and teaching, they have actually complicated what 'church' should be and many have forgotten to let Christ make their local bodies into living, loving, growing, reproducing places.

-JGIG
Whats sad is you labeling it slandering. So in fact you have slandered me. That is what is sad:(

There are plenty threads that talk above love love love grace grace grace but there needs to be an equal measure of what is expected from a child who follows the KING . There needs to be an equal measure exposing false teachers so that the babes do not stumble. Christ is not the focus with all teachers but a false christ they have made up in their minds. You do your thing and Ill do mine:)

Go in peace.
 
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
And it might not even be all of that, but just a critical spirit in general. If things are not done the way some folks are comfortable with, they must cut it down. The sad result is that instead of being willing to bear the Fruit that the Spirit produces, they go about attempting to cut away the Fruit that the Spirit is producing through those who are willing to bear it!

-JGIG
If things are not done the way some folks are comfortable with, they must cut it down.
Yes, I do agree with that! The irony in your statement is astounding.................:eek:
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
Whats sad is you labeling it slandering. So in fact you have slandered me. That is what is sad:(

There are plenty threads that talk above love love love grace grace grace but there needs to be an equal measure of what is expected from a child who follows the KING . There needs to be an equal measure exposing false teachers so that the babes do not stumble. Christ is not the focus with all teachers but a false christ they have made up in their minds. You do your thing and Ill do mine:)

Go in peace.

Well, all that love love love and grace grace grace stuff is the Gospel.

34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (from John 13)

I'm not going anywhere for a bit - still waiting for all that proof you have coming about how mega churches are evil . . . :D

-JGIG
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
Well, all that love love love and grace grace grace stuff is the Gospel.

34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (from John 13)

I'm not going anywhere for a bit - still waiting for all that proof you have coming about how mega churches are evil . . . :D

-JGIG
If you really have those bullets in your gun (proving that mega churches are evil), fire them!

I'll be interested to see what's here when I get back. Kids are hungry. Gonna go feed 'em ;).

-JGIG
 
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
Well, all that love love love and grace grace grace stuff is the Gospel.
34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (from John 13)

I'm not going anywhere for a bit - still waiting for all that proof you have coming about how mega churches are evil . . . :D

-JGIG
Love is stroking the false narratives? Naw! Love shows up to bring truth even when it doesnt feel so good. Iron sharpens iron.

Like I said, I am adding to this post. That means I am adding OP with examples of mega wolves. Comprende'?
 
R

Rosesrock

Guest
Love is stroking the false narratives? Naw! Love shows up to bring truth even when it doesnt feel so good. Iron sharpens iron.

Like I said, I am adding to this post. That means I am adding OP with examples of mega wolves. Comprende'?
Iron only sharpens iron when they agree. Not until you've built a relationship.
Here it is SIRK!!! What you were talking about... Sort Of. Even with well meaning intentions. You can't just shove a thought at someone and expect them to agree.

You have to speak truth in love. If you don't. Even if you were right. It would not be received.
When we speak truth (real truth) you show the world you love them. Not cause strife.

[video]https://youtu.be/cwMFX7hUefc[/video]
 
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
Iron only sharpens iron when they agree. Not until you've built a relationship.
Here it is SIRK!!! What you were talking about... Sort Of. Even with well meaning intentions. You can't just shove a thought at someone and expect them to agree.

You have to speak truth in love. If you don't. Even if you were right. It would not be received.
When we speak truth (real truth) you show the world you love them. Not cause strife.

[video]https://youtu.be/cwMFX7hUefc[/video]
I didnt cause the strife. I just brought in the truth as I see it.

Some dont mind walking the path of resistance and some walk the path of least resistance........
 
R

Rosesrock

Guest
I didnt cause the strife. I just brought in the truth as I see it.

Some dont mind walking the path of resistance and some walk the path of least resistance........
And you can bring truth the way you see it. I do the same. I don't argue. I speak in opinion through experience and how the Lord has taught me. If someone agrees great. If someone doesn't I don't keep going till they do. That's not love. That's confrontational evangelism and not profitable. I see no love in your posts only opinion from what you heard other pastors say. Then you ask if people are going to leave or stay in a conversation. No love.
Why do you feel you need to give milk, bread, meat to a forum you know is built on diverse opinion? The meat (truth) as you see it ??

I'm not even saying I disagree with you. I disagree with your delivery and critical spirit of thinking you're the right one. That's pride.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
And it might not even be all of that, but just a critical spirit in general. If things are not done the way some folks are comfortable with, they must cut it down. The sad result is that instead of being willing to bear the Fruit that the Spirit produces, they go about attempting to cut away the Fruit that the Spirit is producing through those who are willing to bear it!

-JGIG
What kind of fruit are we talking about?

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.

I especially like the last part....against such things there is no law.
 
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
And you can bring truth the way you see it. I do the same. I don't argue. I speak in opinion through experience and how the Lord has taught me. If someone agrees great. If someone doesn't I don't keep going till they do. That's not love. That's confrontational evangelism and not profitable. I see no love in your posts only opinion from what you heard other pastors say. Then you ask if people are going to leave or stay in a conversation. No love.
Why do you feel you need to give milk, bread, meat to a forum you know is built on diverse opinion? The meat (truth) as you see it ??

I'm not even saying I disagree with you. I disagree with your delivery and critical spirit of thinking you're the right one. That's pride.

Thank you . Careful not to fall from your lofty perch:p
 
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
Matthew 12:34
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
Love is stroking the false narratives? Naw! Love shows up to bring truth even when it doesnt feel so good. Iron sharpens iron.

Like I said, I am adding to this post. That means I am adding OP with examples of mega wolves. Comprende'?
56989008.jpg

​. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
Matthew 12:34
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good. For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
How do you know for sure it's not talking about you vs the people it appears to be directed at? Jesus was after all talking to the law keepers.

The burden of "keeping" the law came after Adam fell. The law was not a burden to a pre fall adam. We live under Christ who fulfilled the burden of keeping the law and now we have freedom in Christ. Pretty simple really.
 
Jan 15, 2011
736
28
28
And you can bring truth the way you see it. I do the same. I don't argue. I speak in opinion through experience and how the Lord has taught me. If someone agrees great. If someone doesn't I don't keep going till they do. That's not love. That's confrontational evangelism and not profitable. I see no love in your posts only opinion from what you heard other pastors say. Then you ask if people are going to leave or stay in a conversation. No love.
Why do you feel you need to give milk, bread, meat to a forum you know is built on diverse opinion? The meat (truth) as you see it ??

I'm not even saying I disagree with you. I disagree with your delivery and critical spirit of thinking you're the right one. That's pride.
Critical analysis, examination, and understanding are all key areas for understanding scripture and what is God's opinion and will regarding scripture or anything in our lives. Yes some people can work on tact regarding delivering the truth. However, it doesn't change that God's truth does not change. Regardless of how we want to interpret something, it can mean absolutely nothing if it runs contrary to how God sees it.

I find that many people in the professing church today will say something along the lines of.....
* But that's not how I interpret God's truth
* That's your opinion and not how I see God's truth
* I can interpret God's truth my own way

The fundamental flaw of approaching any situation with this mentality is that God's truth does not change. It has not changed since the beginning of time. There are many ways we can apply His truth, but the underlying truth remains a constant. The minute we interpret God's truth any which way we want to, we can step out into some very unstable waters. Doesn't God's word say to "seek what is pleasing unto the Lord"? We can have our own opinion regarding God's truth but ultimately our responsibility is to allow God change us so we can conform to His truth and not our opinions.

Yes we speak in our opinion and what the Lord has shown us. However, if what we understand as truth doesn't match what another professing believes says is truth, we should then look at what God's word says in context. The Holy Spirit will not contradict Himself. He will not tell one person one thing and then tell another person something else entirely. He will show each individual how to apply God's truth, but that truth as stated before... is the same. If however, we listen to another spirit that tells us that a lie is truth, we look then to the scriptures which state that we need to test the spirits to see if they're from God. We test even teachers and pastors and see if what they say lines up with the word of God.

God's truth is not a consensus. Christianity is not a democracy. It's God's way or the highway (narrow road vs broad road - Matthew 7:13-14). We are not at liberty to reformulate God's truth into something that is appealing to us personally. God's truth often serves to shine a light into our own lives and show us where we are not lining up. The word of God is like a mirror to show us where we are in relation to God. When He shows us where we're off, we simply repent, change, and return back to God's mind, way, and will.

I do agree with where you say, if someone doesn't agree then great, move on. We cannot force people to believe God's truth even in the professing church. However, we are called to help a brother or sister who is in sin and error. The problem is, when we shine God's light on an issue, it will conflict with our flesh (and as we know, the flesh is contrary to the Spirit). So when we speak truth to a brother or sister that is stuck in error and sin, it will not feel good. Would you then say that this is confrontational evangelism and not profitable? I would say to bring truth to a fellow believer regarding error is indeed love. It's not love to allow a brother or sister to continue in sin and say nothing.

Yes we do need to use tact in how we approach things. However, we have to understand that when truth is brought to darkness, there will be conflict in the flesh. How the brother or sister takes it is up to them, but we have a responsibility to do something, not just sit back and allow error to continue.
 
Last edited:
R

Rosesrock

Guest
Critical analysis, examination, and understanding are all key areas for understanding scripture and what God's opinion and will regarding scripture or anything in our lives. Yes some people can work on tact regarding delivering the truth. However, it doesn't change that God's truth does not change. Regardless of how we want to interpret something, it can mean absolutely nothing if it runs contrary to how God sees it.

I find that many people in the professing church today will say something along the lines of.....
* But that's not how I interpret it
* That's your opinion and not how I see it
* I can interpret this my way

The fundamental flaw of approaching any situation with this mentality is that God's truth does not change. It has not changed since the beginning of time. There are many ways we can apply His truth, but the underlying truth remains a constant. The minute we interpret God's truth any which way we want to, we can step out into some very unstable waters. Doesn't God's word say to "seek what is pleasing unto the Lord"? We can have our own opinion regarding God's truth but ultimately our responsibility is to allow God change us so we can conform to His truth and not our opinions.

Yes we speak in our opinion and what the Lord has shown us. However, if what we understand as truth doesn't match what another professing believes says is truth, we should then look at what God's word says in context. The Holy Spirit will not contradict Himself. He will not tell one person one thing and then tell another person something else entirely. He will show each individual how to apply God's truth, but that truth as stated before... is the same. If however, we listen to another spirit that tells us that a lie is truth, we look then to the scriptures which state that we need to test the spirits to see if they're from God. We test even teachers and pastors and see if what they say lines up with the word of God.

God's truth is not a consensus. Christianity is not a democracy. It's God's way or the highway (narrow road vs broad road - Matthew 7:13-14). We are not at liberty to reformulate God's truth into something that is appealing to us personally. God's truth often serves to shine a light into our own lives and show us where we are not lining up. The word of God is like a mirror to show us where we are in relation to God. When He shows us where we're off, we simply repent, change, and return back to God's mind, way, and will.

I do agree with where you say, if someone doesn't agree then great, move on. We cannot force people to believe God's truth even in the professing church. However, we are called to help a brother or sister who is in sin and error. The problem is, when we shine God's light on an issue, it will conflict with our flesh (and as we know, the flesh is contrary to the Spirit). So when we speak truth to a brother or sister that is stuck in error and sin, it will not feel good. Would you then say that this is confrontational evangelism and not profitable? I would say to bring truth to a fellow believer regarding error is indeed love. It's not love to allow a brother or sister to continue in sin and say nothing.

Yes we do need to use tact in how we approach things. However, we have to understand that when truth is brought to darkness, there will be conflict in the flesh. How the brother or sister takes it is up to them, but we have a responsibility to do something, not just sit back and allow error to continue.
Agreed....there is a difference in sitting around with a group of friends you know and trust and a public forum where you only know a profile.:)

Well written
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
Critical analysis, examination, and understanding are all key areas for understanding scripture and what is God's opinion and will regarding scripture or anything in our lives. Yes some people can work on tact regarding delivering the truth. However, it doesn't change that God's truth does not change. Regardless of how we want to interpret something, it can mean absolutely nothing if it runs contrary to how God sees it.

I find that many people in the professing church today will say something along the lines of.....
* But that's not how I interpret God's truth
* That's your opinion and not how I see God's truth
* I can interpret God's truth my own way

The fundamental flaw of approaching any situation with this mentality is that God's truth does not change. It has not changed since the beginning of time. There are many ways we can apply His truth, but the underlying truth remains a constant. The minute we interpret God's truth any which way we want to, we can step out into some very unstable waters. Doesn't God's word say to "seek what is pleasing unto the Lord"? We can have our own opinion regarding God's truth but ultimately our responsibility is to allow God change us so we can conform to His truth and not our opinions.

Yes we speak in our opinion and what the Lord has shown us. However, if what we understand as truth doesn't match what another professing believes says is truth, we should then look at what God's word says in context. The Holy Spirit will not contradict Himself. He will not tell one person one thing and then tell another person something else entirely. He will show each individual how to apply God's truth, but that truth as stated before... is the same. If however, we listen to another spirit that tells us that a lie is truth, we look then to the scriptures which state that we need to test the spirits to see if they're from God. We test even teachers and pastors and see if what they say lines up with the word of God.

God's truth is not a consensus. Christianity is not a democracy. It's God's way or the highway (narrow road vs broad road - Matthew 7:13-14). We are not at liberty to reformulate God's truth into something that is appealing to us personally. God's truth often serves to shine a light into our own lives and show us where we are not lining up. The word of God is like a mirror to show us where we are in relation to God. When He shows us where we're off, we simply repent, change, and return back to God's mind, way, and will.

I do agree with where you say, if someone doesn't agree then great, move on. We cannot force people to believe God's truth even in the professing church. However, we are called to help a brother or sister who is in sin and error. The problem is, when we shine God's light on an issue, it will conflict with our flesh (and as we know, the flesh is contrary to the Spirit). So when we speak truth to a brother or sister that is stuck in error and sin, it will not feel good. Would you then say that this is confrontational evangelism and not profitable? I would say to bring truth to a fellow believer regarding error is indeed love. It's not love to allow a brother or sister to continue in sin and say nothing.

Yes we do need to use tact in how we approach things. However, we have to understand that when truth is brought to darkness, there will be conflict in the flesh. How the brother or sister takes it is up to them, but we have a responsibility to do something, not just sit back and allow error to continue.
That maybe so, but the brother or sister must consent to it and it's probably a pretty good idea to have some sort of relationship with the person. God never forced Himself on anyone and neither should some super hero on a chat forum.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,749
13,155
113
God never forced Himself on anyone

hmm . .

6a00d834516bb169e20167614d8a7f970b-800wi.jpg


But Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
Now as he went on his way, he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven shone around him. And falling to the ground he heard a voice saying to him, “
Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” And he said, “Who are you, Lord?” And he said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. But rise and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do.
The men who were traveling with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one.
Saul rose from the ground, and although his eyes were opened, he saw nothing. So they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus. And for three days he was without sight, and neither ate nor drank.

(Acts 9:1-9)
 
R

RobbyEarl

Guest

hmm . .

View attachment 150110


But Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
Now as he went on his way, he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven shone around him. And falling to the ground he heard a voice saying to him, “
Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” And he said, “Who are you, Lord?” And he said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. But rise and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do.
The men who were traveling with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one.
Saul rose from the ground, and although his eyes were opened, he saw nothing. So they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus. And for three days he was without sight, and neither ate nor drank.

(Acts 9:1-9)
You think that was force, Saul said who are you Lord by his own volition. The dudes by him heard a voice but saw nothing. Saul was seeking God.
 

Yet

Banned
Jan 4, 2014
3,756
69
0
Iron only sharpens iron when they agree. Not until you've built a relationship.
Here it is SIRK!!! What you were talking about... Sort Of. Even with well meaning intentions. You can't just shove a thought at someone and expect them to agree.

You have to speak truth in love. If you don't. Even if you were right. It would not be received.
When we speak truth (real truth) you show the world you love them. Not cause strife.

[video]https://youtu.be/cwMFX7hUefc[/video]
Kinda like the love Jesus showed clearering out the manipulating, money mad, misleading, masters of maniacal misrepresentation, miscreants!
That kinda love? :rolleyes: