Since you are the one making accusations of fraud, it is up to you to provide hard evidence. That is only right and proper. Just as in a court of law the prosecution must prove its case, you should prove your case with facts and evidence.
You sound like the Mad Hatter at the tea party.
Since you are the one making accusations of fraud,
Absurd. Calling out a prima facie claim as bogus when not self-evident is by no means an "accusation" but simply stating the obvious.
it is up to you to provide hard evidence.
Preposterous. I need to provide hard evidence for what is
not happening?? How about the one making the claim of an event that
is happening needs to provide hard evidence.
That is only right and proper.
On this issue it is clear you do not know what is right and proper.
Just as in a court of law the prosecution must prove its case
Ridiculous. Since when is calling out a clearly bogus claim "prosecution"?
you should prove your case with facts and evidence.
Laughable. Since when does the person not making the claim have to show "facts and evidence" that something is not happening.
Example: Many people claim to have been kidnapped by space aliens, are we to just accept their claims as real? Are we forced to provide hard evidence that these events are not happening? Are we "prosecuting" them by pointing out the lack of any proof of these events happening?
Is this how you live your life? Believing all claims unless proved wrong? Is this the tea party you live in?