Muslim Religion
- Thread starter chanchuinchoy
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
It is quite clear that some of the professing Christians in this forum have great hatred for Muslims. This brings up a thought that has been discussed on other forums, usually liberal types. And that is the close parallels between radical Jihadists and the right wing television evangelists:
CHILLING PARALLELS
Right-Wing Christians, Radical Islamic Fundamentalists - They're Pretty Much Exactly the Same
Two of a kind. That is why all the hate and prejudice shown on this forum does not surprise me in the least.
Islam in no way pretends or claims to be part of the Church. So we cannot really call it heretical or false doctrine.
Zionism however has infiltrated the Church, which is why the Beast From The Earth can be correctly identified as (Christian) Zionism. The lamb with horns that speaks as a dragon.
Islam is described by Paul as blasphemous, this is because they do not represent Jesus as he is. Blasphemy being the false representation of God. Islam understands his divine authority, but not his divine nature.
[FONT="]you, then, that teach others, will you not teach yourself? While you preach against stealing, do you steal?[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]22 You that forbid adultery, do you commit adultery? You that abhor idols, do you rob temples? [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]23 You that boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law? [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]24 For, as it is written, “The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.”
[/FONT][FONT="]Even when Paul criticizes Islam, he is really turning the heat on Judaism. (Stealing, (usury), adultery (quickie marriages), Idolatry (homosexual behaviour). )
[/FONT][FONT="]If Judaism represented God properly, then Islam would not exist. Islam was really created as a tonic to Jewish apostasy, which is why Islam detests homosexuality, usury, immorality, and why it demands charity to the widow and orphan.
[/FONT][FONT="]
I have no real definition of Islam, as it is impossible to know what to believe in the age of mass media.
Most terrorist activity is sponsored by and comes out of the US and Israel. Isis is nothing to do with Islam, a fact that is transparently obvious given that ISIS routinely bombs Shia and Sunny Mosques, and goes nowhere near Israel. lol.
[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
Zionism however has infiltrated the Church, which is why the Beast From The Earth can be correctly identified as (Christian) Zionism. The lamb with horns that speaks as a dragon.
Islam is described by Paul as blasphemous, this is because they do not represent Jesus as he is. Blasphemy being the false representation of God. Islam understands his divine authority, but not his divine nature.
[FONT="]you, then, that teach others, will you not teach yourself? While you preach against stealing, do you steal?[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]22 You that forbid adultery, do you commit adultery? You that abhor idols, do you rob temples? [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]23 You that boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law? [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]24 For, as it is written, “The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you.”
[/FONT][FONT="]Even when Paul criticizes Islam, he is really turning the heat on Judaism. (Stealing, (usury), adultery (quickie marriages), Idolatry (homosexual behaviour). )
[/FONT][FONT="]If Judaism represented God properly, then Islam would not exist. Islam was really created as a tonic to Jewish apostasy, which is why Islam detests homosexuality, usury, immorality, and why it demands charity to the widow and orphan.
[/FONT][FONT="]
I have no real definition of Islam, as it is impossible to know what to believe in the age of mass media.
Most terrorist activity is sponsored by and comes out of the US and Israel. Isis is nothing to do with Islam, a fact that is transparently obvious given that ISIS routinely bombs Shia and Sunny Mosques, and goes nowhere near Israel. lol.
[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
K
I'd really appreciate it if you'd post a quote below where anyone here said they hate Muslims.
Quote " And that is the close parallels between radical Jihadists and the right wing television evangelists"
I'm not falling for this one again. Every time I've checked your links they're from atheist sites. And I don't know many Christians that use atheist sites to make their points against other Christians. Just sayin.
Quote "Two of a kind. "
Is that your opinion,or did you get that from an atheist site? Either way,its an opinion.
Another point to "right wing Christians" being just as bad as "radical" Muslims, I judge Islam on its doctrines, in the quran and other scriptures they follow. And I can find many verses that say kill, fight, gather against, ambush ect ect.
You will not find these kinda verses in the Gospel. And even in the OT, people quote verses of putting certain people to death without using the whole bible to show the real meaning behind these teachings, "He who is without sin cast the first stone".
Someone can say "why not use that same standard with the quran", to that Id say, go ahead and prove how the quran doesnt really teach to kill and fight. I have seen many verses that make the literal command to fight, and to this day the only argument Ive seen against this fact is that we are taking "kill the unbelievers" out of context.
(and of course, when they make that claim, they dont prove it by showing context, they just tell you "context")
You will not find these kinda verses in the Gospel. And even in the OT, people quote verses of putting certain people to death without using the whole bible to show the real meaning behind these teachings, "He who is without sin cast the first stone".
Someone can say "why not use that same standard with the quran", to that Id say, go ahead and prove how the quran doesnt really teach to kill and fight. I have seen many verses that make the literal command to fight, and to this day the only argument Ive seen against this fact is that we are taking "kill the unbelievers" out of context.
(and of course, when they make that claim, they dont prove it by showing context, they just tell you "context")
I know it doesn't entirely follow according to the purest rules of logic (human behavior rarely does), but we can also look at immediate application.
Jesus didn't literally conquer the Sinai. Peter, following Jesus' teachings, didn't lead an army across North Africa. Thomas didn't bring a hoard to India. Andrew didn't crucify his enemies in the shape of an x.
What did the Muslims do with the direct influence of their prophet? What did they continue to do right after his death, following his example. It was not about conquering the grave, but bringing people closer to the grave.
Furthermore, Rightist Christians in the United States do their best, perhaps more than at any point in human history, to use the earliest of Christians as an example of right behavior. Is there a great degree of misunderstanding in that pursuit? Of course. Do they tend to non-contextualize Church history? Absolutely.
Few of them, however, seek to follow the example of the Medieval Church militant in the expansion of faith by the sword. Which makes the equating of them with fundamentalist Islam, well, insane.
Jesus didn't literally conquer the Sinai. Peter, following Jesus' teachings, didn't lead an army across North Africa. Thomas didn't bring a hoard to India. Andrew didn't crucify his enemies in the shape of an x.
What did the Muslims do with the direct influence of their prophet? What did they continue to do right after his death, following his example. It was not about conquering the grave, but bringing people closer to the grave.
Furthermore, Rightist Christians in the United States do their best, perhaps more than at any point in human history, to use the earliest of Christians as an example of right behavior. Is there a great degree of misunderstanding in that pursuit? Of course. Do they tend to non-contextualize Church history? Absolutely.
Few of them, however, seek to follow the example of the Medieval Church militant in the expansion of faith by the sword. Which makes the equating of them with fundamentalist Islam, well, insane.
The singular Lord is described via the following revealing term…
فصل لربك وانحر
Fasalli lirabbika wainhar
108.2 So you pray to your Lord and Sacrifice.
انحر= “inhar”
“inhar” definition:
Singular noun.Offer sacrifice; devote ones life for the humanity; place ones hand in prayer on the upper part of the chest.
It comes from the root “nahara” (nun-ha-ra), which means to slaughter, sacrifice, injure the jugular vein, put hand on the upper part of the chest; to sacrifice by cutting the jugular vein.He stabbed, or stuck a camel, or a beast, in the throat. He slew.
وانحر= “wa” +“inhar” =“wainhar” = and sacrifice
References:
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, pp. 2774 – 2775
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur’an, 1[SUP]st[/SUP] edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 555
A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 144
Concordance of the Koran, Gustav Flugel, p. 191
Occurrences of “wainhar” in the Koran: 1
Location: 108.2
Occurrences of the root “nahara” and its one derivative in the Koran: 1
Location: 108.2
Thus....obviously not about 'allah'.....rather, about the Biblical Jesus Christ.
- Status