I do not see how you can believe that. And I shudder to think of what kind of God would make it that way.
You obviously believe in free will for natural man. Where are scriptures that proves your view? I have proven that idea several times, it has all fall short in the light of the totality of scripture.
Imagine if a father had two children. And wanted to give all he had to only one kid. But he chose randomly only one kid based on nothing. Of course the one he gave it to had faith in him after this. the one he did not give it to had no faith. only hate. What kind of father would this be?
No, under the same situation. we have two kids who hate their father, and want nothing to do with him. and their relationship is dead. But he has this gift to offer to restore their fellowship. he offers to both kids. One decides to trust him. one does not. The one who chose to trust him gets his blessings and all he has to offer. the one who does not gets nothing. Is this a Father we would chose to love?
Maybe you are misunderstanding something here?.Not all men are the children of God.
Then no one will go to hell. becaue no one who rejected God by not having faith were given any opportunity or the ability to chose God. Thus they could never be condemned.
No. Everyone is still responsible for their actions. People will go to hell because of unbelief and rejection of Christ. They have themselves only to blame for that.
You stated the HS convicts men did you not? Scripture states he convicts not just the elect, but the WORLD. even saying he convicts them of judgment because they have been judged
We are not discussing here how the word world may be understood and interpreted in various contexts. But, yes, the Holy Spirit do convict sinners, apart from such conviction the sinner will not understand what sin is and how God looks upon it.
A spiritual man understands the advanced doctrines of God because they have the spirit. Can not the HS during his conviction act as a spirit guide to help them understand the Gospel? why do you want to remove power From God and say he is incapable of doing this very thing. Thus man is judged or condemned based on his chose to recieve or reject the gift of God.
You add here "the advanced doctrines of God". This is not found in the text that I quoted, there it is written, quite categorically, that "natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God", we cannot put in a notion that natural man understand
some things of the Spirit of God, or
one single thing of the Sprit of God. And then it's followed up by:: "for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned". So, he
can not know them, he is
unable to know them. Why? Because he's a natural, unregenerate man. That's what this scripture says. I'll go with that. This modernist view of that there be "carnal christians" have enough flaws to be spent time on here. And I am certainly not the one who remove any power from God to do anything, on the contrary I am affirming that it is God, and Him alone, who does all the work at hand here, not man to any extent. It is you who put everything here in the hands of the almighty free will of natural man. It may sound correct to your "logic", but scriptural it is not.
Scripture states HOW God does the choosing. By foreknowledge. Natural man, if convicted by the HS can and do accept the gospel (although they can not understand anything else from God) That is why no man will have an excuse.
In Romans 8 and 9 the word predestination is used. It clearly goes beyong foreseeing something. No man has an excuse for their unbelief, but no man can take or get any credit for their belief.
Man has to be given the ability to recieve or reject. or man has an excuse. Romans 1 says they will have no excuse. because they had the knowledge, but chose to reject it.
The crowd in Romans 1 is not the type and example of all men. There's nothing in Romans 1 that says that these people ever had saving knowledge about Christ. They may have had natural knowledge about that there is a God, and that there is an order of creation etc, but it should not be confused with the knowledge that pertains to salvation. But, yes, they used their free will to reject God, that does not mean that had the ability to positively accept Him.
then when does it come? Justification can only come by faith. if it does not come after, does it come before?? are you changing your mind? And don't say it comes at the same time, this is impossible. One must hear and understand the gospel before they can have faith. If they can not understand until regeneration, their must be a time allowed for them to hear, and understand and chose to believe.
Sorry, misunderstanding by me in my latest post here, I meant to say quite the opposite. I believe that regeneration and justification are intertwined. Yet, as said, I do not speculate about the exact time frame of the events pertaining to ordo salutis. Regeneration would naturally preceed justification though, however it would be hard to argue that there is a "time" lapse between these two, as they are inseparable. The point is still that if faith is a gift of the Spirit, then it stands to reason that only regenerate persons have this, as only regenerate persons have the fruit of the Spirit. Thus, only regenerated persons believes.
We have different perspectives in approaching this issue,. I guess you are coming from SBC, free will, first or fundamental baptist or similar background? My take is the protestant lutheran/reformed. So we do have different views on man. Am I right when I guess that you would say that infants or small babies cannot understand the gospel and therefore cannot receive it?
Sorry. I can not worship a God who choses not to allow hundreds of millions of people the chance to accept them, and send them to eternal damnation based on Gods refusal to let them hear, understand and chose to follow him or reject him. This is not the God of the bible.
I hope you can consider and ponder these things a little closer before making too much of wrong conclusions. Let me ask you this: do you think that every person who ever lived on this earth throughout all time and in all locations, each and everyone had a "chance" to repent and believe, that each and every one of them heard the gospel, and that God manifested Himself to each and every one of them? If this was not the case, was then God unfair, unjust and unrighteos by not doing this for them? Does God owe man something, or anything at all?