A
Haven't read that much of Andrew Murray, more from Iain and John with same surname (not related). I think Andrew struggled with the extent of the atonement and the issue of self. He was inspired by the methodist influenced "mystic" William Law, which is quite graphic. I know that people like Watchman Nee and his successor (some of whose teachings I consider bordering on the cultic) were quite influenced by Andrew. The "mystical" approach to scripture appealed to me somewhat earlier, not that much now. I'd look for the work you mentioned tho, and have a look at it too. I can only say now that if he believed that natural man could surrender to God, then I do not agree with it, as it is unscriptural.
Question? what application is there in splitting hairs over the actual mechanics of regeneration?
Can you give a brief summary of its implications? Does it effect the way we preach the gospel?
Or some other kingdom duty? Or have a impact in our theology that guides our lives? I understand
its bound to be important seeing so much dialogue over it....but at the moment it alludes me. ty