S
I pointed out a handful of cases, with quotations. After some back-and-forth (see page 14), here is his response:
It's not an apology, and I wouldn't consider it 'repentance' but at least he acknowledged it. Whether he changes his practice remains to be seen.
It's not an apology, and I wouldn't consider it 'repentance' but at least he acknowledged it. Whether he changes his practice remains to be seen.
the 'it's under the blood anyway' part is especially precious
he can't continue with the attacks questioning peoples salvation though...it's against the TOS I believe and should be reported
he has done this over and over and thinks he is king tut around here