A Double Standard in Christianity?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,596
13,859
113
Because I didn't capitalize the "j" in "just"?
Before you make assumptions you should look at the about in someone's profile.

And I do take this as an insult.

If I actually were a woman, it would not be an insult for you to think I am a woman.

But because I am a man, I think that you have crossed the line here over into un-Christian behaviour.
Like you have never done that? What a lark!

Instead of throwing more shade and demonstrating your fragile ego to the world (again), consider your own behaviour. She concluded that you were female because of how you present yourself in your posts.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
A verse taken out of context is a pretext.
So, the apostle Matthew was guilty of a pretext when he wrote Matthew 2:15 as a quote from Hosea 11:1. For he applied "I called my son out of Egypt" to Jesus when in the original context that referred to Israel.

Also, 2 Corinthians 9:6, when interpreted in its immediate context, supports the idea of financial sowing and reaping; which is a health/wealth, word of faith, prosperity, name-it-and-claim it dogma. But if you utilize the hermeneutic of 1 Corinthians 2:13 (kjv) and take it out of its context and apply Luke 8:11, you come up with a more orthodox interpretation.

And also, in John 19:37, John applies to the crucifixion a verse that in its original context referred to the 2nd coming (Zechariah 12:10).
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Like you have never done that? What a lark!

Instead of throwing more shade and demonstrating your fragile ego to the world (again), consider your own behaviour. She concluded that you were female because of how you present yourself in your posts.
I pray that the Lord will abundantly bless you for your disparagement of me. I hope and pray that He might give you the desires of your heart; and that you would have a heart that is not characterized by Jeremiah 17:9 but has been changed through Ezekiel 36:25-27 to a Luke 8:15 heart.

This is indeed a blessing and not a curse.

The next thing may be counted partially as a curse: I pray that the Lord may abundantly bless you and also receive you as a son.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,596
13,859
113
We can obtain the promises of the Lord by faith (Hebrews 11:33, 2 Peter 1:3-4, 1 Corinthians 1:20, Romans 4:20-22).

So, if you will ask, seek, and knock (Matthew 7:7-8) concerning this promise of holy scripture (found in 1 John 2:20), you also can receive an unction from the holy one.

Of course, you may not like knowing all things very much; because it seems to me that you don't like the truth.

And you might be inclined to say things that are not the truth even though the unction tells you that they are the truth. Thus you would be held accountable for lying before the Lord; whereas if you do not have the unction (as it is at present) you will only be held accountable for being wrong.
The issue is not that you believe the Holy Spirit teaches you. The issue is that you assume that anyone who disagrees with your interpretation of Scripture is not taught by Him, and you disparage them. You're wrong, and your behaviour is arrogant.
 

Ogom

Active member
Aug 22, 2020
385
100
43
ogom.co
when he wrote Matthew 2:15 as a quote from Hosea 11:1. For he applied "I called my son out of Egypt" to Jesus when in the original context that referred to Israel.

as the Spirit leads and conformed to the Law of Christ: ten commandments in spiritual form + in action and thought in a ChristIan's life ongoing.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,596
13,859
113
You have three fingers pointing back at you (Matthew 7:1-5, Luke 6:41-42).
Do you have anything substantial to say, or are you limited to playground retorts?
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,596
13,859
113

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
The issue is not that you believe the Holy Spirit teaches you. The issue is that you assume that anyone who disagrees with your interpretation of Scripture is not taught by Him, and you disparage them. You're wrong, and your behaviour is arrogant.
I would just encourage you to ask, seek, and knock concerning receiving the unction that I am speaking of.

I think that you are going to find that God is going to rock your world and turn it upside down. Much of what you believe will be turned on its head as you begin to submit your opinions to what the word says by the Holy Ghost.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Your quotation might be taken seriously if you never mocked anyone else.

As you do, frequently, you are a hypocrite.
I am unaware of any situation in which I have mocked anyone else.

Perhaps you could bring that to the forefront out of love for me; so I can bring it before the Lord in confession and be cleansed from that unrighteousness.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
Do you have anything substantial to say, or are you limited to playground retorts?
Pastor Romaine of the Calvary Chapel Movement was the one who originated that "playground retort".

And, he was pretty old when he spoke it for the first time.

However, I would simply point out the following scripture,

Mat 18:3, And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,279
2,557
113
The issue is not that you believe the Holy Spirit teaches you. The issue is that you assume that anyone who disagrees with your interpretation of Scripture is not taught by Him, and you disparage them. You're wrong, and your behaviour is arrogant.
To believe that the Holy Spirit will teach you what is readily available by simple REAL scholarship is nuts.

We aren't talking about even difficult dry reading here but simple deductive reasoning from the scriptures using the most basic of hermeneutics.

But some people believe that the Holy Spirit within them is a reason to disregard the scriptures and license to twist them into saying what they want it to say instead of what it does say.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,279
2,557
113
@JohnDB, was that funny to you because your lie was exposed as being a lie?
No....I didn't lie...but apparently you didn't understand a word I said because you showed zero scholarship of even the most basic understanding of the flat reading of scriptures in your reply and then are trying to disparage me by supposedly psychoanalysis...

Which shows even more violations of anything that the Holy Spirit would lead you to do. I don't know what spirit you follow but it doesn't seem very holy or even logical.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
No....I didn't lie...but apparently you didn't understand a word I said because you showed zero scholarship of even the most basic understanding of the flat reading of scriptures in your reply and then are trying to disparage me by supposedly psychoanalysis...

Which shows even more violations of anything that the Holy Spirit would lead you to do. I don't know what spirit you follow but it doesn't seem very holy or even logical.
Act 18:24, And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.
 

justbyfaith

Well-known member
Sep 16, 2021
4,707
462
83
smh... there are no words.
So, you are saying that you do not love me enough to help me know my sin in order that I might repent.

I do believe that in this, you are being disobedient to Jesus' commandment to love one another; and, if you perceive me to be an enemy, to love your enemies.

Because I love you and desire that you might go to heaven; even though you act towards me as an enemy.
 

Ogom

Active member
Aug 22, 2020
385
100
43
ogom.co

ANSWER



Apollos was an evangelist, apologist, church leader, and friend of the apostle Paul. Apollos was a Jew from Alexandria, Egypt, described as “eloquent,” “mighty in the Scriptures,” “fervent in the spirit” and “instructed in the way of the Lord” (Acts 18:24). In A.D. 54, he traveled to Ephesus, where he taught boldly in the synagogue.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,279
2,557
113
Act 18:24, And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus.
Apparently you have no idea what the logical deductions are from these scriptures...

That's all you have demonstrated up to this point.
 
Jul 24, 2021
494
78
28
I am not adding anything.

1 Timothy 3:2 An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife.
1 Timothy 3:12 Deacons must be the husband of one wife

1 Timothy 3:11 Women must likewise be dignified, not malicious gossips, but temperate, faithful in all things.

As I stated in my comments about 1 Corinthians 11, the Greek words for gender are not role-specific. Romans 16:1 designates a woman as a deacon, which means the "husband of one wife" in 1 Timothy 3:12 cannot mean the role is restricted to men, and if deacon is not a male-only role, then by the same logic, neither is overseer.

Such abominations have nothing whatsoever to do with my view, and never have.
So changing the word "husband" to suit your sensibilities. You should read up on 2 Peter 3:16.

You have enough discernment to know abominations? I doubt that. But consider this, when you have a 100% correlation between effect A and effect B, without knowing what is the cause and effect, would siding with A be supporting B? Look up mainline churches, woman pastors, homosexual marriage.

There is no need for further responses. I think I have learned all need from you. I leave you with the last words.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,279
2,557
113
Where was Alexandria?
What was there? What was the city famous for?

Hint: it wasn't in Virginia.