Answer me this...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

slave

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2015
6,307
1,097
113
#61
So Satan's ultimate purpose was to tempt man away from God. He was always going to rebel.
And he had to be created as such in order to allow man the free will to choose their Creator. Or the adversary. Otherwise, a Christian's pure love for God couldn't be certain. (Summarizing from several posts)

Hypothetically (avoiding the why question :)), what if Satan had not risen up against God? Where would we be, would we even be, had Satan decided the outcome wasn't worth it? (His banishment from Heaven)

Is this question even relevant? Doubtful, just curious.
Not to side-step the big bible deepening debates, but I wanted to say in this post the statement : "He was always going to rebel" opens a door for Satan to suggest to readers that our will matters not if it is going to turn out one specific way anyway. And although I really think you meant it as a summary statement to your thoughts, I want to remind others that we need to remember just because you know the sun will come up tomorrow doesn't mean that you will have caused it to be there! Even tho God already knows what our free choices will end up being, our choices are still ours and are still free. If our free choices change how the future will be, God already knows that and has known that for all eternity.

I believe God intended for us to live in the Garden environment, yet He also knew that it would take another plan to get us there, due to this foreknowledge. The one does not over rule the other.

At the end of this post you ask: "Is this question even relevant, doubtful? I am one to adopt the principle "There are no dumb questions just dumb answers." So if you were led to ask it ask it! In the area of doubtful...you are pursuing God's truth, once He offers an answer then it may be doubtful, but don't allow Satan to make you feel unworthy of your entrance before your Lord.

Satan will use anything he can to distract humans from God's grace. In the question I see where Satan may try to tell us that if God still had him at his right hand we would not even exist! Slapping our faces with it. I also see him suggesting that even tho he didn't stay God wanted him over us, thus we are a disappointing second place to his real desire to fellowship with Lucifer. But this is a lie. It would not be in your asking the question that happened there but Satan's actions that happened there. So be at peace. God loves us--period! smile. OK back to the biblical fonduing for answers now ...:cool:
 
I

iConflicted

Guest
#62
Not to side-step the big bible deepening debates, but I wanted to say in this post the statement : "He was always going to rebel" opens a door for Satan to suggest to readers that our will matters not if it is going to turn out one specific way anyway. And although I really think you meant it as a summary statement to your thoughts, I want to remind others that we need to remember just because you know the sun will come up tomorrow doesn't mean that you will have caused it to be there! Even tho God already knows what our free choices will end up being, our choices are still ours and are still free. If our free choices change how the future will be, God already knows that and has known that for all eternity.

I believe God intended for us to live in the Garden environment, yet He also knew that it would take another plan to get us there, due to this foreknowledge. The one does not over rule the other.

At the end of this post you ask: "Is this question even relevant, doubtful? I am one to adopt the principle "There are no dumb questions just dumb answers." So if you were led to ask it ask it! In the area of doubtful...you are pursuing God's truth, once He offers an answer then it may be doubtful, but don't allow Satan to make you feel unworthy of your entrance before your Lord.

Satan will use anything he can to distract humans from God's grace. In the question I see where Satan may try to tell us that if God still had him at his right hand we would not even exist! Slapping our faces with it. I also see him suggesting that even tho he didn't stay God wanted him over us, thus we are a disappointing second place to his real desire to fellowship with Lucifer. But this is a lie. It would not be in your asking the question that happened there but Satan's actions that happened there. So be at peace. God loves us--period! smile. OK back to the biblical fonduing for answers now ...:cool:

Yeh It was a summary statement :) (said in parentheses) :)But thank you for the clarification.
I understand fully and you're right, It does leave Satan an entry on many fronts. Doubt is a disease!

I started here with a heavy heart and a semi closed mind. Didn't see that at first, but my heart is definitely softening and my mind is taking in information differently.

I owe a few of you apologies. I got defensive and was hard headed in some threads. That probably didn't encourage you to reply to me. :)
For those that continued trying to give me answers... So much gratitude. Thank you for seeing me over this 'why' hurdle. :)
 
B

Brother_J_BELGIUM

Guest
#63
I'm not sure about this but I THINK Revelation 12 speaks about Satan and his angels fall from heaven to the earth. I THINK that is the moment when the devil tempted Eve in the garden. But from this interpretation, one can ask the following: how did the angels get there in heaven before there was even anything created? Jesus Christ was with God in heaven because He stated in Genesis "Let US make humans in OUR image...". But did evil exist already by then? I don't know.
 
I

Is

Guest
#64
Yes, he is referred to as the old serpent but this has to be figurative because of how the serpent in Gen 3 is described. Clearly the serpent in that text is not Satan.
dropjaw.gif You can't be serious! It is absolutely referring to satan. The whole passage reads, "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Rev.12:9
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#65
View attachment 125807 You can't be serious! It is absolutely referring to satan. The whole passage reads, "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Rev.12:9
In a way I think Hermit is right. I believe satan indwelt the serpent.

The bibles description of satan and his actual outward appearance, is quite beautiful.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#66

The Serpent – We do not yet know anything of Satan. All we know about evil at this point is the serpent. What do we learn about him from chapter three?

1. He is a member of the natural world, not a supernatural creature.

2. He is a citizen of the animal domain. He is described as a beast of the field. "Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made."
3. He is the craftiest of beasts. The word crafty suggests skills in evil scheming. He is a sly trixter who is able to deceive others. This seems to be his natural character. This does not place him on an intellectual level with man for he appears to be strictly dyadic in his power of reason. Beasts of the field is the standard of comparison that defines his intellect.
4. He possesses the capacity for speech and reason.
5. He seems to have been a willing participant in the deception so, what are the possibilities.

a. Could he simply have been possessed by Satan? Possibly.

b. Was he himself also tempted? This seems more plausible. For temptation to have any power, there must be the illusion of satisfying some desire. If so, what could he have hoped to gain by the fall of man?

* Seizure of preeminence? Of all natural beings, only man is higher than he.

* Question: Did God create the serpent with a diminished view of reality; an epistemology that was rooted solely in the five senses?
I answered your post in this thread here.

Hope you check it out.

Thank you for what you had written here. It made me ask an interesting question (even though I do not agree with your conclusions involving Genesis 3).

Anyways, may God bless you.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#67
I'm not sure about this but I THINK Revelation 12 speaks about Satan and his angels fall from heaven to the earth. I THINK that is the moment when the devil tempted Eve in the garden. But from this interpretation, one can ask the following: how did the angels get there in heaven before there was even anything created? Jesus Christ was with God in heaven because He stated in Genesis "Let US make humans in OUR image...". But did evil exist already by then? I don't know.
Absolutely not. Everything was pronounced as good and the creation of man was pronounced as very good. Satan and his ilk being kicked from Heaven would have had to happen after the seven days of Creation and rest and before the Fall of Man in the garden of Eden. Angels were created sometime in the first three days of Creation.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#68
View attachment 125807 You can't be serious! It is absolutely referring to satan. The whole passage reads, "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Rev.12:9
Of course Rev 12:9 is a metaphor referring to Satan. What I said was that Gen 3 is not referring to Satan. Satan is also called a dragon, does this mean he was a literal dragon?
 
B

Brother_J_BELGIUM

Guest
#69
Absolutely not. Everything was pronounced as good and the creation of man was pronounced as very good. Satan and his ilk being kicked from Heaven would have had to happen after the seven days of Creation and rest and before the Fall of Man in the garden of Eden. Angels were created sometime in the first three days of Creation.
Sounds pretty reasonable to me. You make some really good points. Thanks for sharing your view on it.
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#71
First, Lucifer was once a good angel; And all good angels were first created on Day 2 of the creation week. This is implied in Psalm 104. For the angels are mentioned on Day 2 within a partial chronology within that chapter.
Tintin said:
Angels were created sometime in the first three days of Creation.
Job chapter 38 verses 1 thru 7

Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?


Since these sons of God are the same sons of God who are angels in Job chapters 1 and 2, it seems to me that angels were created before the LORD laid the foundations of the earth in that they were apparently rejoicing as they witnessed the same. In other words, when we read in Genesis how that God created the heaven and the earth in the beginning, I think that it is significant that heaven comes first. In my present understanding, this creating of heaven included the heavenly beings the angels who, again, predated the LORD's laying of the foundation of the earth.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#72
If God's Creation was perfect until Eve was deceived, how did the serpent come into the Garden to begin with? Why was he (Satan?) permitted access to God's brand new Miracle?

If all is preordained (is all preordained?), was man's downfall known from 'Let there be light?'

If yes, why?
good question! a related idea / issue is: when Eve looks at the fruit, she sees it is "good for making one wise"...

would you give up your knowledge of good and evil to return to Eden?
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#73
If God's Creation was perfect until Eve was deceived, how did the serpent come into the Garden to begin with? Why was he (Satan?) permitted access to God's brand new Miracle?
Hi iConflicted.

There is an interesting portion of scripture contained within the book of Ezekiel which might help to answer your question:

Ezekiel chapter 28 verses 12 thru 19

Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.
Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee.
All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.

Although the prophet Ezekiel was instructed by God to take up his lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, it becomes rather obvious as we read the lamentation that God is not merely speaking to a physical man, but also making reference to an angelic being or to a cherub which was apparently inspiring this natural king to some extent. In other words, this situation seems to be like the time when Jesus, while speaking to Peter, said, Get thee behind me, Satan. Peter obviously wasn't Satan, but he was being inspired by him at that point in time. One of the descriptions of this cherub that we're given is that he was a covering cherub. What does this mean? To me, it points to the two cherubim who overshadowed the mercy seat upon the ark of the covenant which Moses was instructed by God to make and which I believe was a representation of the true ark of the covenant which exists in heaven:

Revelation chapter 11 verse 19

And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail.


There is a true temple or true tabernacle of God in heaven and there is also a true ark of His testament or a true ark of the covenant there as well:

Hebrews chapter 8 verses 1 thru 5

Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:
Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.

Hebrews chapter 9 verses 23 and 24

It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.
For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:


Moses was admonished by God to build an earthly tabernacle with different items contained within it which served unto the example and shadow of heavenly things or which were figures of the true tabernacle in heaven which the Lord pitched and not man. In other words, again, there is apparently an ark of the covenant or an ark of His testament in heaven. With such being the case, is it possible that this covering cherub whom the LORD was addressing thru the prophet Ezekiel was originally one of the two cherubim who covered the true ark of the covenant in heaven and that this covering cherub may actually be the one whom we commonly refer to as Satan? I think that it's quite possible and many Christians throughout the ages have strongly considered the same possibility. If this covering cherub truly is Satan, then what can we learn about his downfall from this portion of scripture?

We learn that this covering cherub was full of wisdom and that his wisdom was ultimately corrupted by reason of his brightness. We're admonished to be wise as serpents and to not be ignorant of the devil's devices, so I see a correlation there.

We also learn that this covering cherub was full of beauty and that his heart was ultimately lifted up because of his beauty. Does this not sound like the pride which goes before destruction? To me, it does.

We also learn that this covering cherub had been in Eden, the garden of God. We know that Satan was there, don't we? The physical king of Tyrus couldn't possibly have been there in that the original Eden was wiped out during the time of Noah's flood.

We also read how this covering cherub was filled with violence. Doesn't this sound like the murderer that Jesus described Satan as being in John chapter 8?

The point that I'm getting at is this:

Again, it seems to me that heaven, the angels, the temple in heaven and the items contained within that temple were all created before the LORD laid the foundation of the earth and that the one whom we now refer to as Satan very well may have been one of the original two covering cherubim who covered the true ark of the covenant in heaven until his downfall which was due primarily to pride. When exactly this downfall occurred I cannot suggest except to say that it occurred some time between this covering cherub's creation which the LORD described as being perfect through the prophet Ezekiel until iniquity was found in him and the account of the fall of man as recorded for us in Genesis chapter 3.

If all is preordained (is all preordained?), was man's downfall known from 'Let there be light?'

If yes, why?
As somebody else already mentioned:

I Peter chapter 1 verses 17 thru 21

And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.


Jesus verily or truly was foreordained before the foundation of the world to be the spotless Lamb of God. The Godhead, in its foreknowledge, had the plan of redemption in place before the fall of man ever took place in real time.

I apologize for the long post, but I wanted to have the scripture in front of us so that it could be understood what I am actually referring to and suggesting.
 
M

MyLighthouse

Guest
#74
If God's Creation was perfect until Eve was deceived, how did the serpent come into the Garden to begin with? Why was he (Satan?) permitted access to God's brand new Miracle?

If all is preordained (is all preordained?), was man's downfall known from 'Let there be light?'

If yes, why?
Answer:
1. God created the serpent like He created all other animals
2. God created Lucifer (Satan) to be the guardian cherub
3. Cherubs keep records of heaven and hold the knowledge of God, as well as sent to earth for great task
4. Guardians are responsible for the care and protection of (insert)
5. Satan's was to be a guardian for God's new Miracle as well as holding his angelic positions (he already had this access to mankind before his downfall)
6. Everything God creates has freewill, the ability to chose right from wrong
7. God is clear to let His creation know right from wrong and how to choose the right
8. Preordain doesn't mean God chooses for His creation, it means He pre-knew it
9. God knew that Satan would fall and that man would fall
10. That's why He was sure to make our Savior, His Word the first of all creation

Why did God allow it:
1. God wants us all to mature
2. God didn't want Adam and Eve to fall under temptation
3. God wanted them to experience raising above, overcoming sin through His Word, as we see Jesus do (the only one of God's creation to do so)
4. Freewill is to lead us to the full capacity of life with and in God, maturity

 
Jul 10, 2015
107
2
0
#75

The Serpent – We do not yet know anything of Satan. All we know about evil at this point is the serpent. What do we learn about him from chapter three?

1. He is a member of the natural world, not a supernatural creature.

2. He is a citizen of the animal domain. He is described as a beast of the field. "Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made."
3. He is the craftiest of beasts. The word crafty suggests skills in evil scheming. He is a sly trixter who is able to deceive others. This seems to be his natural character. This does not place him on an intellectual level with man for he appears to be strictly dyadic in his power of reason. Beasts of the field is the standard of comparison that defines his intellect.
4. He possesses the capacity for speech and reason.
5. He seems to have been a willing participant in the deception so, what are the possibilities.

a. Could he simply have been possessed by Satan? Possibly.

b. Was he himself also tempted? This seems more plausible. For temptation to have any power, there must be the illusion of satisfying some desire. If so, what could he have hoped to gain by the fall of man?

* Seizure of preeminence? Of all natural beings, only man is higher than he.

* Question: Did God create the serpent with a diminished view of reality; an epistemology that was rooted solely in the five senses?
The word other is not in the Hebrew, for which you draw your conclusion that the serpent is of the earth. That is simply not in the original Hebrew.

If you look at Genesis 3:1 in the Hebrew, the word "other" is not there.

Most of your other assumptions are faulty, too.

For example, I've already shown that you draw your whole idea that the serpent is beast of the field by using an English translation that uses the word "other", while various English translations use language "more crafty than ANY beasts of the field."

That's a very poor leap, using one English translation's sentence (in this case a poor usage), to draw up your ideas that are NOT written in scripture. This is what Paul warned against in 1 Cor 4:6 about "not exceeding what is written...".

You must stick with what is written, and not add or take away, or else you get into fancies that are not there from God.

MORE: If this serpent were a creature of the beasts of the field, and has intellect as you state, and is one of the created creatures on earth, it is already at work in denying God and causing sin? If you stop to think about what you are saying, then take your extrapolation further, to the point where the serpent, one of the creatures created by God on earth, is already actively working against God and trying to undermine the relationship God made with Adam & Eve. Difficult to conceive.


But what is more interesting, is that the devil whose name is Satan, is not a fallen creature the way everybody has been taught, since Christ Himself said,

John 8:44 "You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Now, it seems clear here, that the devil did not start off as good and then fall. According to the Lord, he was a liar and murderer from his/the beginning. If he is a "fallen angel", that would imply a point BEFORE which he was good or decent, but that is not what Christ says. Christ seems to indicate here, that the devil is the way he is, from his beginning. He did not fall.

I could go on, including the fact that "Lucifer" is a transliteration error, that only occurs in the KJV bible, and there ONLY, and only once, but even to the Victorian age (400 years ago), they might have realized that the word meant the planet Venus, but I will stop now. Getting too long.
 
Last edited:
I

iConflicted

Guest
#76
Hi iConflicted.

There is an interesting portion of scripture contained within the book of Ezekiel which might help to answer your question:

Ezekiel chapter 28 verses 12 thru 19

Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.
Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.
Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee.
All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.

Although the prophet Ezekiel was instructed by God to take up his lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, it becomes rather obvious as we read the lamentation that God is not merely speaking to a physical man, but also making reference to an angelic being or to a cherub which was apparently inspiring this natural king to some extent. In other words, this situation seems to be like the time when Jesus, while speaking to Peter, said, Get thee behind me, Satan. Peter obviously wasn't Satan, but he was being inspired by him at that point in time. One of the descriptions of this cherub that we're given is that he was a covering cherub. What does this mean? To me, it points to the two cherubim who overshadowed the mercy seat upon the ark of the covenant which Moses was instructed by God to make and which I believe was a representation of the true ark of the covenant which exists in heaven:

Revelation chapter 11 verse 19

And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail.


There is a true temple or true tabernacle of God in heaven and there is also a true ark of His testament or a true ark of the covenant there as well:

Hebrews chapter 8 verses 1 thru 5

Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:
Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.

Hebrews chapter 9 verses 23 and 24

It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.
For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:


Moses was admonished by God to build an earthly tabernacle with different items contained within it which served unto the example and shadow of heavenly things or which were figures of the true tabernacle in heaven which the Lord pitched and not man. In other words, again, there is apparently an ark of the covenant or an ark of His testament in heaven. With such being the case, is it possible that this covering cherub whom the LORD was addressing thru the prophet Ezekiel was originally one of the two cherubim who covered the true ark of the covenant in heaven and that this covering cherub may actually be the one whom we commonly refer to as Satan? I think that it's quite possible and many Christians throughout the ages have strongly considered the same possibility. If this covering cherub truly is Satan, then what can we learn about his downfall from this portion of scripture?

We learn that this covering cherub was full of wisdom and that his wisdom was ultimately corrupted by reason of his brightness. We're admonished to be wise as serpents and to not be ignorant of the devil's devices, so I see a correlation there.

We also learn that this covering cherub was full of beauty and that his heart was ultimately lifted up because of his beauty. Does this not sound like the pride which goes before destruction? To me, it does.

We also learn that this covering cherub had been in Eden, the garden of God. We know that Satan was there, don't we? The physical king of Tyrus couldn't possibly have been there in that the original Eden was wiped out during the time of Noah's flood.

We also read how this covering cherub was filled with violence. Doesn't this sound like the murderer that Jesus described Satan as being in John chapter 8?

The point that I'm getting at is this:

Again, it seems to me that heaven, the angels, the temple in heaven and the items contained within that temple were all created before the LORD laid the foundation of the earth and that the one whom we now refer to as Satan very well may have been one of the original two covering cherubim who covered the true ark of the covenant in heaven until his downfall which was due primarily to pride. When exactly this downfall occurred I cannot suggest except to say that it occurred some time between this covering cherub's creation which the LORD described as being perfect through the prophet Ezekiel until iniquity was found in him and the account of the fall of man as recorded for us in Genesis chapter 3.

As somebody else already mentioned:

I Peter chapter 1 verses 17 thru 21

And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear:
Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,
Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.


Jesus verily or truly was foreordained before the foundation of the world to be the spotless Lamb of God. The Godhead, in its foreknowledge, had the plan of redemption in place before the fall of man ever took place in real time.

I apologize for the long post, but I wanted to have the scripture in front of us so that it could be understood what I am actually referring to and suggesting.
Thank you for your long post! I'm asking the wrong questions. Not that they shouldn't be asked. But I'm reading all this so differently now.

Your signature. That was chosen for me. (And anyone else who benefitted :)) I am caught in that snare and was fully unaware of the extent.

Ill return to this when my mind and my heart are centered on Christ. There's a stumbling block that im refusing to walk over and its poisoning any attempts towards God's promise of rest. I'm in His way. I must surrender ALL at God's feet and trust Him to carry me. I must forgive fully those who have wronged me. I must pray for them with Christ's love. Until I do, I'm blind and hardened against a true understanding. My relationship with God will be superficial. I must increase my faith and release the sins of the past. (Thank you pwn:))

God bless you!! :)
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#77
Thank you for your long post! I'm asking the wrong questions. Not that they shouldn't be asked. But I'm reading all this so differently now.

Your signature. That was chosen for me. (And anyone else who benefitted :)) I am caught in that snare and was fully unaware of the extent.

Ill return to this when my mind and my heart are centered on Christ. There's a stumbling block that im refusing to walk over and its poisoning any attempts towards God's promise of rest. I'm in His way. I must surrender ALL at God's feet and trust Him to carry me. I must forgive fully those who have wronged me. I must pray for them with Christ's love. Until I do, I'm blind and hardened against a true understanding. My relationship with God will be superficial. I must increase my faith and release the sins of the past. (Thank you pwn:))

God bless you!! :)
We all need to back away at times and get our focus fixed firmly back on Christ. I pray that you find your desired rest in Christ.
 
I

iConflicted

Guest
#78
The word other is not in the Hebrew, for which you draw your conclusion that the serpent is of the earth. That is simply not in the original Hebrew.

If you look at Genesis 3:1 in the Hebrew, the word "other" is not there.

Most of your other assumptions are faulty, too.

For example, I've already shown that you draw your whole idea that the serpent is beast of the field by using an English translation that uses the word "other", while various English translations use language "more crafty than ANY beasts of the field."

That's a very poor leap, using one English translation's sentence (in this case a poor usage), to draw up your ideas that are NOT written in scripture. This is what Paul warned against in 1 Cor 4:6 about "not exceeding what is written...".

You must stick with what is written, and not add or take away, or else you get into fancies that are not there from God.

MORE: If this serpent were a creature of the beasts of the field, and has intellect as you state, and is one of the created creatures on earth, it is already at work in denying God and causing sin? If you stop to think about what you are saying, then take your extrapolation further, to the point where the serpent, one of the creatures created by God on earth, is already actively working against God and trying to undermine the relationship God made with Adam & Eve. Difficult to conceive.


But what is more interesting, is that the devil whose name is Satan, is not a fallen creature the way everybody has been taught, since Christ Himself said,

John 8:44 "You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Now, it seems clear here, that the devil did not start off as good and then fall. According to the Lord, he was a liar and murderer from his/the beginning. If he is a "fallen angel", that would imply a point BEFORE which he was good or decent, but that is not what Christ says. Christ seems to indicate here, that the devil is the way he is, from his beginning. He did not fall.

I could go on, including the fact that "Lucifer" is a transliteration error, that only occurs in the KJV bible, and there ONLY, and only once, but even to the Victorian age (400 years ago), they might have realized that the word meant the planet Venus, but I will stop now. Getting too long.
Oh man that brings up too many questions so im going to not bother at this time :)
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
#79
The word other is not in the Hebrew, for which you draw your conclusion that the serpent is of the earth. That is simply not in the original Hebrew.

If you look at Genesis 3:1 in the Hebrew, the word "other" is not there.
Since I do not know anything about the Hebrew language I will have to take you word that 'other' is not in the text. Whether it is in the Hebrew or not it is still a fact that the text does not place him on an intellectual level with man. Beasts of the field is the standard of comparison that defines his intellect.
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#80
Before man´s downfall, Heaven was actually divided... That was the reason why Satan approached humankind (on earth, not in heaven).

As long as the earthly "purgatory" exists, humankind (each individual) has to prove, by him-herself, if they deserve eternity (and with WHOM they´re going to be with: With God´s ppl or in Hell)