Are WOMEN Pastors Biblical??

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,344
13,716
113
Open minds like open windows work best when they have screens in place. There are several denominations that promote women and sodomites in their clergy.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
You didn't answer my questions. I'm inclined to assume the answer to the latter.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,747
29,113
113
The United Methodist Church has also been discussing the issue for many years; its official position until May 2018 denied ordination to "Self-Avowed Practicing Homosexuals".
The United Church of Canada has had an openly gay person as their "head" for quite some time.

OTTAWA, August 23, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An openly homosexual United Church minister from Vancouver was elected as the 41st moderator of the United Church of Canada at the Protestant denomination’s General Council meeting held at Ottawa’s Carleton University last week.

Rev. Gary Paterson of St Andrew’s-Wesley United Church in downtown Vancouver was elected from a field of 15 nominees on August 16 to become the first openly homosexual leader of a major Christian denomination in Canada.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
If you are married and I know you are not at this time why would you not want children? I think having children teaches sacrifice of self for others. Having children will teach many things that you cannot learn in a classroom. You will learn patience having children. So no you do not need to have children but they are probably an evidence of the health of the marriage and the maturity of the parents.

So you are able to allow yourself to discern that Paul was not demanding that one have children but that if he has children to rule them well. And therefore you must allow yourself to discern that Paul may have been saying that if you are married you must only be married to one wife. It is not intellectually honest to be inflexible that Paul is demanding marriage, but flexible that Paul is not demanding children in the same two connecting sentences.

I do not think it wise to not consider how the denominations that embrace women pastors also embrace sodomites in the clergy.

Denominations that embrace homosexual clergy embraced many other sins many years ago, including the liberal theology that got them to that point. Ordaining women was not related. You can see that by observing the Assemblies of God, the most conservative of all the denominations demanding total abstinence of alcohol from their clergy and would not tolerate alcoholic deacons and elders which seem to be common in the SBC who do not ordain women. So comparing the SBC to the AOG there is a much more strict holiness emphasis in the AOG and yet they have ordained women since they began. Therefore using your logic the AOG would be an example of how ordaining women would lead to more holiness in the church. (I don't think that is true, I am just following your logic of observing the moral conditions of a denomination that ordains women)
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
So you are able to allow yourself to discern that Paul was not demanding that one have children but that if he has children to rule them well. And therefore you must allow yourself to discern that Paul may have been saying that if you are married you must only be married to one wife. It is not intellectually honest to be inflexible that Paul is demanding marriage, but flexible that Paul is not demanding children in the same two connecting sentences.
A single man brings a number of serious defects into the ministry. It is not advisable to place a single man into the demands and temptations that accompany a pastoral ministry.
Denominations that embrace homosexual clergy embraced many other sins many years ago, including the liberal theology that got them to that point. Ordaining women was not related. You can see that by observing the Assemblies of God, the most conservative of all the denominations demanding total abstinence of alcohol from their clergy and would not tolerate alcoholic deacons and elders which seem to be common in the SBC who do not ordain women. So comparing the SBC to the AOG there is a much more strict holiness emphasis in the AOG and yet they have ordained women since they began. Therefore using your logic the AOG would be an example of how ordaining women would lead to more holiness in the church. (I don't think that is true, I am just following your logic of observing the moral conditions of a denomination that ordains women)
There appears to be no limit to the lengths you are willing to go to justify behaviors that are not biblically sound. One sin does not justify another but they together point to a lack of knowledge of what God has determined to be righteous.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,344
13,716
113
A single man brings a number of serious defects into the ministry. It is not advisable to place a single man into the demands and temptations that accompany a pastoral ministry.
A single man is inherently defective? Wow. Poor Jesus; obviously he wasn't qualified to pastor your church. Tell me: what are these alleged defects, and how does saying, "I do" rectify them?

There appears to be no limit to the lengths you are willing to go to justify behaviors that are not biblically sound. One sin does not justify another but they together point to a lack of knowledge of what God has determined to be righteous.
Conflating female leadership with homosexuality is both erroneous and ignorant.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
A single man is inherently defective? Wow. Poor Jesus; obviously he wasn't qualified to pastor your church. Tell me: what are these alleged defects, and how does saying, "I do" rectify them?
Jesus was more than a single man. For you wisdom is required.
Conflating female leadership with homosexuality is both erroneous and ignorant.
Your opinion is not sound.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
S

Scribe

Guest
A single man brings a number of serious defects into the ministry. It is not advisable to place a single man into the demands and temptations that accompany a pastoral ministry.
That is not what Paul taught in 1 Cor 7. Therefore you are developing a philosophy of reasoning that is not in line with what Paul said about the benefits of being single as it related to undistracted devotion to the things of God. Paul therefore taught that it enhanced ones ability to give oneself to the Word of God and Prayer which was the emphasis for being a good minister.

Having experience with marriage and kids might help you counsel someone who is married and has kids but will never replace devotion to the Word of God and Prayer as being the chief concern of a good minister of the New Testament. And devoting yourself to the Word of God and Prayer by being free from the responsibilities of wife and family is something to be valued for the minister who has the gift of celibacy. That is what Paul taught and your not allowed to change it.

It is therefore not possible that Paul had in mind that an elder or deacon must be married.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,000
4,313
113
If you are married and I know you are not at this time why would you not want children? I think having children teaches sacrifice of self for others. Having children will teach many things that you cannot learn in a classroom. You will learn patience having children. So no you do not need to have children but they are probably an evidence of the health of the marriage and the maturity of the parents.

I do not think it wise to not consider how the denominations that embrace women pastors also embrace sodomites in the clergy.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
This is very personal attack on a person I am recommending you be banned. You know nothing of this person's ability to have children or not. You have this personal and it is enough. To suggest one is not in healthy marriage because there are no children is ridiculous
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,000
4,313
113
That is not what Paul taught in 1 Cor 7. Therefore you are developing a philosophy of reasoning that is not in line with what Paul said about the benefits of being single as it related to undistracted devotion to the things of God. Paul therefore taught that it enhanced ones ability to give oneself to the Word of God and Prayer which was the emphasis for being a good minister.

Having experience with marriage and kids might help you counsel someone who is married and has kids but will never replace devotion to the Word of God and Prayer as being the chief concern of a good minister of the New Testament. And devoting yourself to the Word of God and Prayer by being free from the responsibilities of wife and family is something to be valued for the minister who has the gift of celibacy. That is what Paul taught and your not allowed to change it.

It is therefore not possible that Paul had in mind that an elder or deacon must be married.
that was a foolish statement by a very unlearned person. To say

"A single man brings a number of serious defects into the ministry."

This was a point made as I see, to you from another posting. I have made a recommendation to Admin. I am sorry you would have to be attacked about your status of marriage or not being married.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
that was a foolish statement by a very unlearned person. To say

"A single man brings a number of serious defects into the ministry."

This was a point made as I see, to you from another posting. I have made a recommendation to Admin. I am sorry you would have to be attacked about your status of marriage or not being married.
I did not take it that way. The conversation has been about whether Paul was demanding that an elder be married. I don't think that he was insinuating that I personally would bring a number of serious defect into the ministry. Though I am probably seriously defected and need Jesus to be my ability for ministry. LOL
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,000
4,313
113
I did not take it that way. The conversation has been about whether Paul was demanding that an elder be married. I don't think that he was insinuating that I personally would bring a number of serious defect into the ministry. Though I am probably seriously defected and need Jesus to be my ability for ministry. LOL
Well, I did not see it that way. How can one be "defected" when they're called by God? we are not defective we are to be effective. There are many ministers who are single that were not married and Peter and those who were married spent great times away from the wives to do the work of God. Paul said I wish you were all as I (not Married) so one could do more for the kingdom of God. All young men should invest in the work of God prior to marriage because God expects you to take care of your family first. As Paul said.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
"feminine bias"
I just can't :LOL::ROFL::ROFL:
I fairly asked you is this what you believe, that people in a church with a woman preacher are not saved or mostly not saved and just think they have the Holy Spirit? You said yea such church is dead, so you concurred, allowing for "a few sheep" to have been "caught in the situation" (thus the others in that church aren't sheep). Then call me biased when I reiterate your own belief to you?
The point still stands.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
Ah, so you probably believe that the parable of the sheep and goats is Jesus dividing the Church.
Not at all. You know that it is the division of the saved and the lost. Many who claim the name of Christ, claim it in name only. Many in the church today are not saved. They come for various reasons, whether that be for family, music and entertainment or other programs. Their true love for Christ and the things of God would be found wanting.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
There have been many women evangelist in the history of the church and there still are today. Just imagine all those people saved from hearing a woman evangelist being in heaven one day and Roger saying. I don't approve, because she is a woman, not allowed , against the rules, and God would say. "is that really who you think I am?"
I concur with what notuptome said here: "Now if one pastors a church without the call of God then all the admonitions from scripture need not apply"

Many so called churches today are being pastored by individuals who have not been called by God. They are individuals who have taken it upon themselves as a "job", and in the near future may weary of this job. They may be products of a seminary but this does not mean they were called to preach. If a church is being led by one who has not been called, then Scripture ordinances would mean little to them. The same could be said for so called believers.

Perhaps we need to be reminded of what happened to Nadab and Abihu, when they tried to alter the proper way to worship and approach God.

Lev 10:1-2 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took each of them his censer, and put fire therein, and laid incense thereon, and offered strange fire before Jehovah, which he had not commanded them. And there came forth fire from before Jehovah, and devoured them, and they died before Jehovah.

Lev 10:6 And Moses said unto Aaron, and unto Eleazar and unto Ithamar, his sons, Let not the hair of your heads go loose, neither rend your clothes; that ye die not, and that he be not wroth with all the congregation: but let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which Jehovah hath kindled.

Now God is not likely to consume those who keep not His ordinances today. But this is a clear warning to all of us, that if we desire to worship and approach God, it must be done on His terms and keeping to all of His Ordinances and Commandments. Ignoring the prohibition of woman preachers, is a modern equivalent to offering "strange fire". It places the non called person in danger and can endanger the whole congregation. (v.6).

However, I do not agree with him, that women do not evangelize. All believers perform evangelistic works when they witness to another. Whether this be men or women, both are equally qualified.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,770
113
To suggest one is not in healthy marriage because there are no children is ridiculous
Unless there are physiological reasons for not having children, marriage and children go together according to the Bible. And if a couple cannot have children because of physiology, then they can certain adopt children, since there are hundreds of children who need a good home. So it is not really ridiculous to expect a married couple to also have children.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,747
29,113
113
Unless there are physiological reasons for not having children, marriage and children go together according to the Bible.
Marriage and not having children also "go together according to the Bible."
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,747
29,113
113
James 1:27 says, Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look
after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.


It does not say adopt them.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
I concur with what notuptome said here: "Now if one pastors a church without the call of God then all the admonitions from scripture need not apply"

Many so called churches today are being pastored by individuals who have not been called by God. They are individuals who have taken it upon themselves as a "job", and in the near future may weary of this job. They may be products of a seminary but this does not mean they were called to preach. If a church is being led by one who has not been called, then Scripture ordinances would mean little to them. The same could be said for so called believers.

Perhaps we need to be reminded of what happened to Nadab and Abihu, when they tried to alter the proper way to worship and approach God.

Lev 10:1-2 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took each of them his censer, and put fire therein, and laid incense thereon, and offered strange fire before Jehovah, which he had not commanded them. And there came forth fire from before Jehovah, and devoured them, and they died before Jehovah.

Lev 10:6 And Moses said unto Aaron, and unto Eleazar and unto Ithamar, his sons, Let not the hair of your heads go loose, neither rend your clothes; that ye die not, and that he be not wroth with all the congregation: but let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which Jehovah hath kindled.

Now God is not likely to consume those who keep not His ordinances today. But this is a clear warning to all of us, that if we desire to worship and approach God, it must be done on His terms and keeping to all of His Ordinances and Commandments. Ignoring the prohibition of woman preachers, is a modern equivalent to offering "strange fire". It places the non called person in danger and can endanger the whole congregation. (v.6).

However, I do not agree with him, that women do not evangelize. All believers perform evangelistic works when they witness to another. Whether this be men or women, both are equally qualified.
That is a good example of how those who think that Paul banned women from positions of ministry in church are following the spirit of the Pharisees and using OT scripture to support their positions, as they do indeed seem to need a list of rules to pride themselves in keeping howbeit those rules are often extrabiblical traditions based on bad interpretation of scriptures they do not understand.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,770
113
Marriage and not having children also "go together according to the Bible."
Not really. When God withheld children from some couples, there was a deeper reason, as we see in the case of Samuel. But the fundamental principle is laid out in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible.