1) If atheists don't believe in God, then why do they get mad at Him?
2) If atheists don't think He is real, then why do they blame him for everything?
3) If people can't tolerate other religious views other than their own, why do they hold to a position thats high in their own belief?
4) If people originated with or from monkeys, why then isn't it fully proven to be not a theory?
5) Why do they call it a theory, but still teach it through books and school?
I don't understand???????
1) Atheists will say they are not ~mad @ God~ as this would be an affirmation on their part that God exists.
2) Who they will blame are those representing religious belief systems that call into question THEIR belief system. As a result you will not see much of a jeremiad against Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, for example, as these belief systems place no "requirements" or "restrictions" upon those who do not believe as they do.
3) You will note that atheists have the remarkable ability to ~selectively~ target specific belief systems and yet ignore others. You will see very little atheist activity against the Islamic belief system and yet this belief system has, as one of the tenets of its ~holy book~ the command to kill all those who are unbelievers (Quran 2:191-193). This is either extremely disingenuous on their part or simply cowardly in that they do not wish to antagonize individuals who very likely would kill them for their protests. Unlike targeting christians who are instructed to ~turn the other cheek~.
4) Evolution will never advance beyond theory as the acceptance or ~belief~ in evolution necessitates abandonment of the scientific method. The scientific method is simply this:
1. Make observations.
2. Propose a hypothesis.
3. Design and perform an experiment to test the hypothesis.
4. Analyze your data to determine whether to accept or reject the hypothesis.
5. If necessary, propose and test a new hypothesis.
As can be seen with ~step 3~ of the scientific method there is absolutely no way to design an experiment to test a hypothesis establishing evolution as anything beyond theory as this would necessitate the scientist to be present during the progress of the experiment. Notice that there are two important qualities about a hypothesis expressed as an "if … then" statement. First, it is testable; an experiment needs to be set up to test the validity of the statement. Second, it is falsifiable; an experiment could be devised that might reveal that such an idea is not true. If these two qualities are not met, then the question being asked cannot be addressed using the scientific method. It is interesting that one NEVER sees an experiment in scientific literature that addresses the possible falsity of evolution. This, in and of itself, should demonstrate to any and all the~protected status~ that evolutionary theory enjoys.
To the atheists who would argue at this point that God can not be proven by science, they would be correct in that statement since God is SUPERNATURAL and beyond the field of science in that it (science) can only investigate natural phenomena.
5) From a world perspective - if christianity is no longer the accepted norm of a society, something will necessarily ~fill the vacuum~. This can be demonstrated very simply by reviewing the results of those countries who adopted the communistic model for government. In that system God is cast aside. This was eloquently expressed by Lenin: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." So, it is no surprise that evolution has become a main stay in our school system since religion in any form has been essentially banned.
Hope this helps!
