Bark of the Least

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#81
Oh this must be for ME! I have yet to read >>>"EVE conceived and gave birth to Cain"<<<...and what lame interpretation of the bible is being posted here. You lack and miss me. Me you cannot see when choosing you over me doubt you.

?????????????
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#82
And where is your proof that what Jesus says below does not fit in with the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem?:

(Luke 21:20 KJV) And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

(Luke 21:22 KJV) For these be the days of vengeance, that ALL things which are written may be fulfilled.

What does "ALL things which are written may be fulfilled." mean ? Does ALL mean ALL or some of ALL?

Are you saying Jesus was mistaken or that he lied?
this part actually is about the destruction of jerusalem in AD 70...

but neither revelation nor any of the rest of the new testament for that matter was written when jesus spoke those words...therefore none of the new testament would be included in 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled in AD 70...
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#83
this part actually is about the destruction of jerusalem in AD 70...

but neither revelation nor any of the rest of the new testament for that matter was written when jesus spoke those words...therefore none of the new testament would be included in 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled in AD 70...
So you are saying that John's revelation had nothing to do with any of the OT prophecies - it just dropped "down" to add to what was not previously said?

John calls on many elements from the OT - so I don't put much stock in your statement.

But then you have no clue as to who is the whore of Babylon so I'm not surprised you would think John was revealing something new.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#84
this part actually is about the destruction of jerusalem in AD 70...

but neither revelation nor any of the rest of the new testament for that matter was written when jesus spoke those words...therefore none of the new testament would be included in 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled in AD 70...
The dates that scholars have placed on the letters cause a lot of misunderstanding. I will tell you now, that I do not study much outside of the bible - like how the scholars came up with these dates. But from reading the bible, I do not accept them. There is no way that Revelation was written as late as 70-100AD. You can try to persuade me otherwise, but you will be more successful (if you are right) if you use the bible to do it. Again, I have done some research outside of the bible, but I don't put a lot into it because I do not trust the record of uninspired men - unless of course they agree with scripture.
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#85
this part actually is about the destruction of jerusalem in AD 70...

but neither revelation nor any of the rest of the new testament for that matter was written when jesus spoke those words...therefore none of the new testament would be included in 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled in AD 70...
After reading this more closely - all I can say is WOW......*shakes head*

What school of theology are you attending as a student?
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#86
So you are saying that John's revelation had nothing to do with any of the OT prophecies - it just dropped "down" to add to what was not previously said?

John calls on many elements from the OT - so I don't put much stock in your statement.

But then you have no clue as to who is the whore of Babylon so I'm not surprised you would think John was revealing something new.
i see no reason to assume john was just needlessly repeating what had already been written...
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#87
The dates that scholars have placed on the letters cause a lot of misunderstanding. I will tell you now, that I do not study much outside of the bible - like how the scholars came up with these dates. But from reading the bible, I do not accept them. There is no way that Revelation was written as late as 70-100AD. You can try to persuade me otherwise, but you will be more successful (if you are right) if you use the bible to do it. Again, I have done some research outside of the bible, but I don't put a lot into it because I do not trust the record of uninspired men - unless of course they agree with scripture.
this really has nothing to do with the debate over when the new testament is written...

i was just pointing out the self evident fact that the new testament was not written until after jesus spoke those words...meaning that he was not including the new testament in the 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled within that time frame...
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#88
After reading this more closely - all I can say is WOW......*shakes head*

What school of theology are you attending as a student?
it's funny that you assume jesus was referring to writings his listeners would not have known about since they hadn't been written yet... :D
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
#89
this really has nothing to do with the debate over when the new testament is written...

i was just pointing out the self evident fact that the new testament was not written until after jesus spoke those words...meaning that he was not including the new testament in the 'all things which are written' that had to be fulfilled within that time frame...
But you do deny the intertwining of prophecy of the OT and NT? For example, Daniel and Revelation (there are others)? There is, in my opinion, a lot of overlap between prophecies that were given in the OT and NT. As well as there fulfillment during the first century.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#90
But you do deny the intertwining of prophecy of the OT and NT? For example, Daniel and Revelation (there are others)? There is, in my opinion, a lot of overlap between prophecies that were given in the OT and NT. As well as there fulfillment during the first century.
there is overlap between old testament prophecy and new testament prophecy...but probably not as much as both preterists and futurists think...

there are also parts that don't overlap...my point was that anything in the new testament that doesn't overlap with the old testament would not be under the restriction of being fulfilled within the given time frame...
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#91
there is overlap between old testament prophecy and new testament prophecy...but probably not as much as both preterists and futurists think...

there are also parts that don't overlap...my point was that anything in the new testament that doesn't overlap with the old testament would not be under the restriction of being fulfilled within the given time frame...
All NT prophecy is based on old testament prophecy.

(Rom 9:4 KJV) Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;

(Rom 15:8 KJV) Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:

(Acts 28:20 KJV) For this cause therefore have I called for you, to see you, and to speak with you: because that for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#92
there is overlap between old testament prophecy and new testament prophecy...but probably not as much as both preterists and futurists think...

there are also parts that don't overlap...my point was that anything in the new testament that doesn't overlap with the old testament would not be under the restriction of being fulfilled within the given time frame...

Someone copied someone
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#93
Satan loves preterits.
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#94
You know why Satan loves them. Cause when he says you can't buy or sell unless you take this mark. They will say do I get in this line or that one?
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#95
You know it helps to which line to get in. Like at the DMV, you have stood in line for an hour and finally make it to the counter and the lady says you need to be in the other line. That line goes out the door and wraps around the parking lot 10 times.