Benefits of Speaking, Praying, and Singing in Tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Every Biblical instance of interaction between angels and humans demonstrates that angels speak human languages.

It demonstrates that they CAN speak human languages. It in no way proves that when talking among them selves that they speak human languages.

In fact, John understood them perfectly well even when they were speaking to each other (See Revelation 7:2).

When Paul states “ the tongues of men and of angels” Paul is using his literary skills to make an example of hyperbole/the superlative used for rhetorical effect to emphasize the superiority of love.
That's one way to interpret it, but I don't think it's the correct way.

Paul does this in many places, example….. and if I have faith, all faith as if to move mountains (superlative/hyperbole) but do not have love I am nothing.
Yes, hyperbole is used in many places in the Bible. But I do not believe 1 Cor 13:1 is hyperbole.

Might I also add that when glossolalia has been studied by various linguists, across different ethnicities, the person who is speaking in tongues/glossolalia duplicates the sounds (phonemes) of his or her native language.

For example the sounds made by an American speaker consistently has distinctly different phonemes from a Japanese speaker. On the other hand, there is strong sameness of sounds among the people of a particular ethnicity or group.
I cannot address that, and it really does not matter, does it? To me, it's just another attempt to debunk tongues as not genuine, not from God.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
Here is a report found in a book documentating a Catholic nun possessed and speaking in tongues that did not come with interpretation. There are other reports that gives line of discernment that God's gift of tongues cannot be this kind of tongue.

[video=youtube;CBJyp7USS9g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBJyp7USS9g[/video]
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
[video=youtube;NZbQBajYnEc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZbQBajYnEc[/video]
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
This is so not a scientific study, my son has a doctorate in neuroscience and linguitics and the research methods used were sloppy to the core, pretty much renders this evidence meaningless.


[FONT=&quot]In fact, brain-imaging studies like this one don't leave much room for negative results. Researchers typically use five or 10 subjects to image cerebral blood flow under two conditions—while subjects perform an experimental task (like speaking in tongues) and a control task (like gospel singing). By comparing the two pictures, they can figure out the places where brain activity is specific to each condition.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Differences between the experimental and control tasks can appear in any of a large number of the brain's cortical structures, and they can look like either increases or decreases in blood flow. With so many possible outcomes, you might get some false positives through random chance, so researchers have to correct their statistics for multiple comparisons. Not everyone does this.

The glossolalia researchers, for example, chose to skip this step.


Even when scientists take it, there's a very good chance that their analysis will produce some positive results. As long as the two tasks they choose for their subjects aren't exactly the same, they should end up with a list of brain structures associated with one task but not the other.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The bias toward positive findings can make it hard to interpret an imaging experiment. If you're the scientist, you might make the somewhat tautological argument that whatever turns up on your scans constitutes a "network" of brain areas associated with the thing you're studying. If you scan the brains of people speaking in tongues, ergo, you find the brain areas associated with speaking in tongues.

Which is a good thing for you, because positive results make for juicy newspaper articles. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2006/11/thinking_in_tongues.html[/FONT]





[video=youtube;NZbQBajYnEc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZbQBajYnEc[/video]
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
That video wasn't the study undergrace. It was a news report on it.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I am familiar with his work, I have found no evidence, via his CVI, that this supposed "study" was ever published in a reputable journal of neuroscience or linguistics.

But he did get his five minutes of fame, so good for him.


That video wasn't the study undergrace. It was a news report on it.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Here is a report found in a book documentating a Catholic nun possessed and speaking in tongues that did not come with interpretation. There are other reports that gives line of discernment that God's gift of tongues cannot be this kind of tongue.

[video=youtube;CBJyp7USS9g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBJyp7USS9g[/video]
Well, when God told him to get rid of the book - He should have gotten rid of the book period and not kept any part of it! He better be thanking God for his mercy . . . What happened to Ananias and Sapphira when they held back part of the money for the land they sold? (Acts 5) If you or anyone else for that matter choose to not believe in speaking in tongues - then leave the subject alone.

And why are you trying to find things that are against speaking in tongues when Paul received his revelation directly from Jesus Christ - yet you want to attribute the act of speaking in tongues as an act of Satan? Wasn't Jesus accused of casting out demons by Beelzebub, the prince of demons? . . . nothing new under the sun!

The devil moves against the things of God aggressively and relentlessly - you just keep helping him, Ok. I will keep speaking truth . . . 1 Cor. 12-14 are given to us so that we are not ignorant of spiritual matters. That we know how to operate with the power that God has given us through his gift of holy spirit. The power to stand against the methods of the adversary . . . the power to enable us to walk like Jesus did. The ability to exhort, edify, and encourage one another in the body of Christ. . . . Contend for the faith!!

 
Last edited:
J

jaybird88

Guest
Interesting. I believe what Paul taught and wrote in his letters was scripture, as authoritative as any other scripture in the Bible. Also Paul was an apostle of Jesus Christ (Rom 1:1).
i believe Paul as well, i also believe Paul would never teach something that could not be found anywhere in the scriptures.
i believe in what Paul and Jesus taught in establishing a fact by three witnesses. yet we can not do that with the spirit language.


Of course not. It was not possible to speak in tongues before the day of Pentecost.
Acts 17:11

11 Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.

interesting Paul did not rebuke these guys explaining to them that he was establishing new doctrines with no foundation in the holy scriptures.


I don't know, and it does not really matter to me. The Bible mentions it, and I try and follow the Bible.
if they way we believe today has changed from the way they believed in the days of Jesus and the 12 it matters a lot to me.
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
A relationship with God is just that - a relationship. God is Spirit - He talks to me via the gift he has given me - I talk to him via the gift he has given me. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. John 4:23,24


i agree in serving the Father in spirit and truth, Jesus, John, Elijah all did this, and we have no examples of them needing a spirit language to do this. Jesus even specifically taught on prayer and the spirit language is never mentioned. Jesus teaches the Most High knows what we think, why would you need a spirit language to tell Him what He already knows,

Again, you are asking questions that seem to be questioning God's integrity . . . God said do it - I do it. God told us the profit of doing so . . . we trust and believe what is written.
we are told to test all things, just like the Jews in Thessalonica. when testing this spirit language it does not add up with the scriptures. had the Jews in Thessalonica searched the scriptures for a spirit language they would not have found it.

What Jesus taught?
And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high. Luke 24:49
And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. Acts 1:4
Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear. Acts 2:33
there is no spirit language mentioned.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Hi Shrume, you said:

Shrume: No, vv8-10 are a list of manifestations. Nine different ways the gift of holy Spirit is "made plain", or "made visible".
Earlier I mentioned the analogy of the Swiss Army knife. Another example might be a light bulb. A light bulb has two manifestations: light and heat. They are not "gifts" that the light bulb gives, they are different ways the light bulb can manifest itself, or "make itself plain".


Wolf: The example is good to understand. But what makes you so shure that with manifestation are not gifts meant?
Gifts are not manifestations.

If I give you a light bulb, that is the gift. I am not giving you heat and light. Heat and light are manifestations of the gift of the light bulb.

we know that 1.Cor. 12, 8 said that " For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another.......
Here is clear saying that this 9 gifts (which you call manifestations) are not given all to every christian, but each gift to different believers. Otherwise Pauls example with the body would not fit.
As I mentioned before, the overall context of 1 Cor 11-14 is meetings of the church (the body of Christ.)

1 Cor 11:17)
(NIV) In the following directives I have no praise for you, for your meetings do more harm than good.

(ESV) But in the following instructions I do not commend you, because when you come together it is not for the better but for the worse.

Chapters 12-14 have to do primarily with the manifestations of the holy Spirit with regards to the church, in meetings. In meetings, God inspires different people to do different things.

Also, we know that it can't be true that a person gets only one "gift". Paul states explicitly that all Christians are to speak in tongues (1 Cor 14:5). In 1 Cor 14:23 there is an example of everyone in the church speaking in tongues. Also, God wants all Christians to speak in tongues AND to covet to prophesy.

So the understanding of 1 Cor 12:8-10 that a person receives only one "gift" does not hold up.

Shrume:I do not know of any other verse in the Bible that defines or describes any other manifestation besides those listed in 1 Cor 12:8-10. Do you?

Wolf: Romans 12,6-8 this are called: charisma
Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith; 7 Or ministry, let us wait on our ministering: or he that teaches, on teaching; 8 Or he that exhorts, on exhortation: he that gives, let him do it in simplicity; he that rules, with diligence; he that shows mercy, with cheerfulness.
In those verses, Paul is mixing gifts with manifestations. In the body of Christ, everyone has things they are "good at". Some people are exceptionally good at the manifestation of prophesy, others at ministering, others at exhorting people, etc.

Also, there ARE gift ministries in the church:
Eph 4:
8) Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
11) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;

EVERY Christian can operate the manifestation of prophesy, but not every Christian has the gift ministry of a prophet.

Ore would you say there is no spiritual gifts, like in 1.Cor. 12? interesting that Paul is mention prophecie, but not speaking in tongues (as he did not mention in whole Romans)
I don't think that tongues should be discarded simply because Paul does not mention it in Romans.

Shrume: They are not gifts, they are manifestations OF the gift of holy spirit.
And the bible distinctly states that the manifestation of the spirit is given to EVERY man (meaning Christian) (1 Cor 12:7).


Wolf: Either you say they are manifestations of the Spirit ore you say they are manifestations of the gift of the Holy Spirit. I would say both are not the same! can you please clarify what you mean?
They are the same.

Shrume: I mean that every Christian has the gift of holy Spirit, and that every Christian has the ability to manifest that gift in nine different ways. The manifestation of "gifts of healing" is the only manifestation that is called a "gift" because healings are ALWAYS a gift.

Wolf: Where it is said in the bible that every Christian has the ability to manifest the gift of the Holy Spirit in nine different ways?
Sigh... That's what we are talking about, Wolf.

1 Cor 12:
7) But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.

The nine manifestations are then listed in vv8-10.

That only the manifestation of healing (now you call it gift) is a gift is not logic, either all which are listet are giftore none!
Read the list of manifestations in 1 Cor 12:8-10. ONLY ONE is called a gift, and that is gifts of healing. Tongues is never called a gift, interpretation is never called a gift, word of knowledge and word of wisdom are never called gifts. Only healing is called "gifts of healing", and that is because healing is always a gift.

Shrume: When the apostles spoke in tongues on the day of Pentecost, who did the speaking? The apostles did. When Peter heard Cornelius and his family speaking in tongues in Acts 10, who did the speaking? Cornelius and his family did. When people prophesy, who does the speaking? The prophets do. "The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets" (1 Cor 14:32).

Wolf: right the people spoke, but are you shure that this events in acts 2 and 10 was not only for to show that the Holy spirit now is sent?
Yes. As 1 Cor 14:5 states, every Christian should want to speak in tongues.

Do you think they had a choice to speak ore not?
Absolutely they had a choice. God does not possess people.

From whom they knew that they have had the ability to speak in languages/tongues?
At some point, they were taught by other people.

Shrume:Christians are responsible for the operation of the manifestations of the gift of Holy spirit. Because of the power of the Holy Spirit dwelling in you, you have the ability to speak in tongues whenever you want to. If you don't know you can, you won't.


Wolf: Where you got this theologie from?
The Bible.

This theory you will find only in pentecostal ore charismatic theologie!
Unfortunately that is often the case, and worse, many Pentecostals and charismatic groups apparently have never read 1 Cor 14 because they all speak in tongues at once, nobody is interpreting, etc.

Nowhere in the bible it is said that Christians have the ability to speak in tongues whenever they want?
14) For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.

15) What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.

16) Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?

23) If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad?

If the church comes together and everyone speaks in tongues at once, who is making them do it? Surely not God, because He does not want them to do so.

27) If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret.

28) But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.

Paul is giving instruction on how tongues with interpretation is to be done in the church. If people could not speak in tongues at will, instruction would not be necessary. But again, God does not possess people.

Even in the apostolic time it was not a gift for all, otherwise Paul made a mistake in 1. Cor. 12,30
Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?

Again, in meetings, not everyone does everything.

In the consequence then all who are not speaking in tongues are guilty of disobidiance and ignorance to gods word? Where it is written?
If Christians are not speaking in tongues in their private life, I submit that it is primarily due to ignorance and fear. Most Christians simply don't know what it is, or that they can do it. They read the verse that says "I would like all of you to speak in tongues..." but rationalize it away.

Shrume: That being said, several of the manifestations require revelation from God. You can't just demand a miracle to be performed. You can't demand that someone be healed. God has to give you the go-ahead, and then it's up to you to carry it out. An example of that is in Acts 14:
8) And there sat a certain man at Lystra, impotent in his feet, being a cripple from his mother's womb, who never had walked:
9) The same heard Paul speak: who stedfastly beholding him, and perceiving that he had faith to be healed,
10) Said with a loud voice, Stand upright on thy feet. And he leaped and walked.

Paul "perceiving that he had the faith to be healed" was revelation from God (word of knowledge and word of wisdom, two more of the manifestations).

Wolf: thats a pure assumption, without any scripture proof.
Do you have a better explanation for how Paul perceived that the cripple had the faith to be healed?
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
i forgot a line:

Shrume:Again, we have an Adversary, and I believe he worked (and still works!) overtime to minimize and corrupt the truth of what God made available to Christians through the gift of holy Spirit.

Wolf: so you think the Azusa Street Movement, the Torontoblessing and the Powerevangelism movement are fakes?
I don't know much about them, so I cannot say.

But I believe God wants people to walk in the power of the gift of the Holy spirit that He gave. It's true that you don't hear much about the manifestations of holy Spirit prior to last century, especially tongues, but I do not fault God for that. I blame the adversary for talking people out of it.
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
There's been a few different links and whatnot to various videos on the internet regarding tongues in this thread.

There are also many videos 'out there' of people speaking in tongues -

I'm curious to know (and get links/addresses to) which ones you would consider "legit", i.e. the person speaking is what you would consider to be an example of speaking "genuine tongues"?

I'm not looking for links to people explaining tongues but rather speaking in what would/could be considered a legitimate example of 'tongues speech'.

You don't have to post an actual video or even a hyperlink; just copy the IP address so I can copy and paste it into my browser - whatever method is easier.

By the same token, I'd be curious to know what you'd consider examples of, for lack of a better term, "fake tongues".

If possible - a short blurb about why you consider it not to be legit; what about it screams "fake" to you?


I've heard numerous examples of tongues speech, but there seems to be a lot of controversy over what's considered "legit" and what's not. For me they're all one in the same; I don't differentiate - glossolalia is glossolalia, but....that said, it would be interesting to have examples of what's considered to be legit and not.
 

Kavik

Senior Member
Mar 25, 2017
795
159
43
I think I'm in sort of agreement of what I believe you're saying, i.e. in short, Biblical reference to speaking in tongues refers specifically to speaking real language(s).

I was curious though for those people that hold that Biblical tongues refers to the modern practice of glossolalia, what would be considered an example of what they perceive/believe to be genuine/legitimate tongue speech and what they perceive to not be genuine/legitimate.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
I think I'm in sort of agreement of what I believe you're saying, i.e. in short, Biblical reference to speaking in tongues refers specifically to speaking real language(s).

I was curious though for those people that hold that Biblical tongues refers to the modern practice of glossolalia, what would be considered an example of what they perceive/believe to be genuine/legitimate tongue speech and what they perceive to not be genuine/legitimate.
Well, you are fortunate to read that post of mine before it was deleted.

Acts 2 is an example of God's gift of tongues in action as the devout Jews from every nation on the earth, hear these local Galilean disciples speak in their native tongue.

1 Corinthians 12th chapter has Paul explaining in verse 7-11 when the Holy Spirit manifest tongues in the assembly, it will come with interpretation to profit the body withal.

When tongues is not being understood by a foreigner nor being interpreted because the tongue speakers makes excuses for it as being a prayer language by the Holy Spirit being done in the assembly, that is not God's gift of tongues being manifested at all when the Holy Spirit cannot speak for Himself but speak what He hears for why God's gift of tongues is only for speaking unto the people... not back to God.

John 16:[SUP]13 [/SUP]Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]20 [/SUP]Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men.[SUP]21 [/SUP]In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.
 
Last edited:

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,006
4,317
113
Here is a report found in a book documentating a Catholic nun possessed and speaking in tongues that did not come with interpretation. There are other reports that gives line of discernment that God's gift of tongues cannot be this kind of tongue.

[video=youtube;CBJyp7USS9g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBJyp7USS9g[/video]

lol could you please provide proof that the gifts of the Holy Spirit in 1cor chapter 12 are not for today ? I know you suggest that when the Bible was completed the gift of tongues was done away with because you think 1cor 13: 10

"But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away." means the "Bible" but the word "bible" is not used any where in the scriptures or in any book of the 66 or in that of the catholic bible ? so how does one come to that conclusion?

also why do all of the videos used have books of the devil and the occult to explain what the Bible speaks about in 1cor 12, 13, 14 chapters?

is it because there is not enough BIBLE to support your position against tongues spoken today ? that causes you to seek outside of the Bible to support your understanding and your position ? and I also would like to point out the above writing it states "
Here is a report found in a book documentation a Catholic nun possessed and speaking in tongues that did not come with interpretation."

you fail to mention the book was written by a witch as the video states. Was that something you chosen to overlook ?

I can only speak for myself but I would never use the writing of witches to support my Biblical position and do you think it is ok to use writings of witches as a method of supporting a biblical position instead of the Bible only?

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Sep 6, 2014
7,034
5,435
113
Matthew 6:5-8
And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 6But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

7But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. 8Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
you fail to mention the book was written by a witch as the video states. Was that something you chosen to overlook ?

I can only speak for myself but I would never use the writing of witches to support my Biblical position and do you think it is ok to use writings of witches as a method of supporting a biblical position instead of the Bible only?

Thank you
Only because Isaiah 8:19 was not enough to prove you that the devil has a supernatural tongue too.

Isaiah 8:[SUP]19 [/SUP]And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?

The Bible confirms the devil has that kind of tongue BEFORE Pentecost.

And here is another source that pagan's practices involves speaking in supernatural tongues too.

Pagan Practices | History of Tongues | Ecstatic Language

Ecstatic language was a common form of worship in pagan temples.[SUP]i[/SUP] It was well established in Ancient Byblos (1100 BC). Plato (429-347 BC) mentions it as a phenomenon in his time. He tells us that a person under divine possession received utterances and visions that the receiver did not understand.
These utterances were sometimes accompanied by physical healing of people present. Virgil (70-19 BC) tells us that the Sibylline priestess, when in prayer, united her spirit with the god Apollo and spoke in strange tongues.[SUP]ii[/SUP]
I believe Paul was speaking about that tongue in regards to Gentiles in relations to their idols...

1 Corinthians 12:1Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.[SUP]2 [/SUP]Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led.

But only the Lord can reveal that to you...
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
vain repetitions of the heathen: Gospel Chapel sermons are a free Christian resource including sermons, sermon notes, a daily devotion, and audio sermons

~The heathen used vain repetitions in their prayers that were more showy than valuable. Let's look at an example of how the heathen used vain repetitions.
We find that in 1KI 18:26, "And they took the bullock which was given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning even until noon, saying, O Baal, hear us. But there was no voice, nor any that answered. And they leaped upon the altar which was made."
This was their whole prayer before Baal: "O Baal, hear us, O Baal, hear us." They used that vain repetition from morning until noon. Repetition, repetition. There was no answer. They leaped upon the altar. They put on a show; they put on a scene, and they kept crying, "O Baal, hear us."
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,006
4,317
113
Only because Isaiah 8:19 was not enough to prove you that the devil has a supernatural tongue too.

Isaiah 8:[SUP]19 [/SUP]And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?

The Bible confirms the devil has that kind of tongue BEFORE Pentecost.

And here is another source that pagan's practices involves speaking in supernatural tongues too.

Pagan Practices | History of Tongues | Ecstatic Language



I believe Paul was speaking about that tongue in regards to Gentiles in relations to their idols...

1 Corinthians 12:1Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.[SUP]2 [/SUP]Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led.

But only the Lord can reveal that to you...
Isaiah 8:19 is the bible. the book made by witches is not. and the witch book in the video was used to support the Bible ? lol
and Isiah 8:19 context is those who speak to the dead nothing to do with tongues that was a very big stretch

The Hebrew word for "familiar spirits" 'owb which is "necromancer, one who evokes the dead"
Those who are speaking in tongue in the context of 1 cor chapter 12, 13, and 14 do not invoke the dead LOl.

and the word Mutter in the Hebrew means "
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]to roar, growl, groan" has nothing to do with tongues LOL[/FONT]

[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif] Isaiah 8 the chapter has nothing to do with what you have and the verse you used is a warning. the devil is not even mentioned in the verse you are building a straw-MAN lol[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif] there is not tongues mentioned in verse 19 in chapter 8 of Isaiah.

again you are moved by hatred for those who do not believe the way you do. [/FONT]
 
Last edited: