Can we or can we not lose our salvation?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
Theological summaries

Hyper Grace
Sin => Hell
Sin => Forgiveness (the cross) (past, present, future) faith in Christ => Heaven
Sin => Heaven

Traditional
Sin => Hell
Sin => Forgiveness (the cross) (past, present) faith in Christ => Heaven
Sin => Obedience (repentance, confession, forgiveness) faith => Communion => Heaven
Blameless Obedience => Communion => Heaven
Sin => faithlessness => Hell

The two models appear similar. A sinful world is doomed to hell.
Through faith in the cross we gain forgiveness of sins.
Hyper grace says this one off act of faith in Christ forgives all future sins.
There is no separation between you and God from now on, sin is irrelevant.

Traditional view
Through faith in the cross we gain forgiveness of sins.
We are called to obedience and following. If sin occurs we have a means to
get forgiveness, through repentance, confession and faith in Christ.
We expect in the end to walk blamelessly in obedience to the Lord.
If sin leads to loss of faith we are lost.

Hyper grace care about sin, but are never free from it.
I do not think the issues are more complex than this.
I do not mean to insult or slander anyone, but if you say you hold to a different position
you need to actually state it, and not just attack me.
The "traditional" view is not salvation by works, which is all you have to offer. Though you try so hard to cloak it with an abundance of irrelevent words.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
It's a roman catholic teaching that's crept it's way into churches... this belief that salvation is not a one time event, that salvation must be maintained, that you can never be sure of your salvation, and you're threatened with an anathema if you claim you're eternally forgiven and have eternal life. Straight from Rome and sadly embraced by so many.

In the same way, the old catholic doctrine of indulgences is also being taught in the protestant churches, in the guise of the "prosperity gospel" - same principle, but different name. Catholic teachings, all from Rome and being taught in protestant churches.... daughters.

Works based salvation.
Catholics believed that justification must be maintained through works and sacraments, not salvation. If they maintain justification then they will be saved. IT might seem like a fine point, but it's crucial because many Protestants believe that salvation is a one-time event, and not a life-long process.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
For anyone that missed it, the keyword there is eternal :) There's no changing it's meaning. I really don't believe God would lie when He says we have eternal life.
He's not lying. Yet that eternal life is IN his son. So he's not lying either when he says that if you don't abide IN his son, you don't have eternal life.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
Catholics believed that justification must be maintained through works and sacraments, not salvation. If they maintain justification then they will be saved. IT might seem like a fine point, but it's crucial because many Protestants believe that salvation is a one-time event, and not a life-long process.
Salvation is not a "process".
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,142
13,149
113
58
Protestants believe that salvation is a one-time event, and not a life-long process.
There are 3 tenses to salvation:

1. We have been saved from the PENALTY of sin (Justification).

2. We are being saved from the POWER of sin (ongoing Sanctification).

3. We will be saved from the PRESENCE of sin (Glorification).

Justification is a one-time event. Ongoing Sanctification is a life-long event.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
He's not lying. Yet that eternal life is IN his son. So he's not lying either when he says that if you don't abide IN his son, you don't have eternal life.
Every Christian is in Christ, and Christ is in every Christian.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
It is obvious that your argument is not an argument at all.

You do not believe sin is a salvation issue.

The argument about works has been closed in the time of the apostles.
Without works your faith is dead.

A christian living in sin is not a christian. The two concepts do not go together.
But you have not addressed this issue, so obviously your answer is flawed.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
It is obvious that your argument is not an argument at all.

You do not believe sin is a salvation issue.

The argument about works has been closed in the time of the apostles.
Without works your faith is dead.

A christian living in sin is not a christian. The two concepts do not go together.
But you have not addressed this issue, so obviously your answer is flawed.
God settled the "sin issue" 2000 years ago.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
The "traditional" view is not salvation by works, which is all you have to offer. Though you try so hard to cloak it with an abundance of irrelevent words.
an abundance of irrelevent words - I never thought of theology as an abundance of irrelevant words

I have to conclude this is also your attitude to Christs words and precepts.
But I do understand. If belief in Christ is just faith in Him and everything else is heresy, then you have
already closed your mind and heart of to the foundations of walking with Jesus.

So many religious people do this, because to think is to get confused and feel unsure of yourself.

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
Rom 12:2

If faith is just about belief or faith in Christ, the above words would be empty.
To test and approve of God's will takes effort and thought.

And at the very foundation is love and morality. Yet it strikes me this is the very
thing you are trying to run away from, while actually condemning yourself daily
with hyper-legalism. Jesus came to set you free from all this by shining a light
on real sin, and getting yourself right with God and man.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
an abundance of irrelevent words - I never thought of theology as an abundance of irrelevant words

I have to conclude this is also your attitude to Christs words and precepts.
But I do understand. If belief in Christ is just faith in Him and everything else is heresy, then you have
already closed your mind and heart of to the foundations of walking with Jesus.

So many religious people do this, because to think is to get confused and feel unsure of yourself.

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
Rom 12:2

If faith is just about belief or faith in Christ, the above words would be empty.
To test and approve of God's will takes effort and thought.

And at the very foundation is love and morality. Yet it strikes me this is the very
thing you are trying to run away from, while actually condemning yourself daily
with hyper-legalism. Jesus came to set you free from all this by shining a light
on real sin, and getting yourself right with God and man.
You're not a theologian.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,928
6,420
113
if we use the Biblical definition of sin, which is missing the mark, stumbling, falling short of a standard, knowing to do good and not doing so, then ( peter) we ALL qualify.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
You're not a theologian.
I am a student of God and the beliefs of man.
And as I have said before it is not the person putting the argument that matters, rather
the argument itself. It appears you do not have an answer to the position so are attempting
to play the man.

And our teacher is the Holy Spirit who leads us into all truth.
It appears this is where you are lacking.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
When I sin, it is because I have failed to walk appropriately.
This is rare, but ofcourse always possible.

According to many I sin constantly, even here on cc. But then that is a hyper-legalists
view, so I am sure I do not need to take that seriously.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
I am a student of God and the beliefs of man.
And as I have said before it is not the person putting the argument that matters, rather
the argument itself. It appears you do not have an answer to the position so are attempting
to play the man.

And our teacher is the Holy Spirit who leads us into all truth.
It appears this is where you are lacking.
You have allowed the beliefs of men to reign supreme in your thinking, and to lead you into the pit of humanism that stands against the truth that the Holy Spirit leads us in.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
if we use the Biblical definition of sin, which is missing the mark, stumbling, falling short of a standard, knowing to do good and not doing so, then ( peter) we ALL qualify.
Interesting generalisation. As soon as you start with the idea of a mark, you need to define which
marks are you refering to. Like the rich young man, I walk blamelessly. But Jesus said, give all your
wealth to the poor and come follow me, if you want to be perfect.

And no we do not all fail to qualify, once we have been cleansed and purified by Christ.
Yes in our old lives, but it is our faith that we can walk in love and righeousness, now today.
Or do you disbelieve Christ and the apostles?
 
Last edited:
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
When I sin, it is because I have failed to walk appropriately.
This is rare, but ofcourse always possible.

According to many I sin constantly, even here on cc. But then that is a hyper-legalists
view, so I am sure I do not need to take that seriously.
What does it mean to walk "appropriately". And why do you fail at it?
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,928
6,420
113
Interesting generalisation. As soon as you start with the idea of a mark, you need to define which
marks are you refering to. Like the rich young man, I walk blamelessly. But Jesus said, give all your
wealth to the poor and come follow me, if you want to be perfect.

And no we do not all qualify, once we have been cleansed and purified by Christ.
Yes in our old lives, but it is our faith that we can walk in love and righeousness, now today.
Or do you disbelieve Christ and the apostles?
peter, I wish you would quit playing games. you know exactly what I am talking about. Biblical definition of sin. but since you think you have none, you make up, or use a man-made system to lower the standard.

no one shuold read the Bible and think " well, I don't do most of that so I'm o/k". dangerous thinking when you get there.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
if we use the Biblical definition of sin, which is missing the mark, stumbling, falling short of a standard, knowing to do good and not doing so, then ( peter) we ALL qualify.
Amen..whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

Legalists have a very low opinion of sin in order to justify their "good works" for their salvation. They won't steal, or commit physical adultery or murder but they will be filled with malice and slander and bitterness and to them - this is perfectly acceptable.

In their "minds" they are walking blameless.

They water down the law and sin so that they can be justified in their own eyes. Living from the belief in the finished work of the grace of Christ is the only way to live the true Christian life.
 
Last edited: