Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I wil listen to the pope. When did he say Muslims follow Jesus? I don't recall that. Of course he is Christian, He heads the largest Christian Church. These statements are absurd!
You would be better served listening to Christ and the apostles. then some man who calls himself the pope..

Just saying.......
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Back in the day the name Allah was adopted it as practically the same, if not the same as Elah, another name for Elohim. The Aramaic evolutioned the two words in separate directions.

This is not so. In essence Arabic is like Aramaic and Hebrew in the formation of its words, and the double L clearly distinguishes it from words which contain a single L. It indicates two syllables, one ending in L and the other beginning in L. This is not true of ilah. Thus there is no way in which the words are even partially synonymous.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
Ya'll make up as much about the pope as you do the Catholic Church! Lol
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,255
6,544
113
All I am sharing is that Allah and Elah or El are closely related in the evolution of Hebrew and Arabic, both pf wjocj jave Ara,aoc in its development.

Elohim is not one word it is the plural of mighty one, thus it is mighty ones. This is how gods were referrred to. You may say it is not true or it is true, but we are speacking of three alphabets here, transliterations into English and other languages,. You cannot say it has a double L when it is in another alphabet.

I cannot speak for Arabic, but I do not believe there is sucha thing as a double lamed in Hebrew, thet is the closest equivalent to an L in the alefbet (Hebrew alphabet.)

Although I have read the Old testament and much of the New in Hebrew, I am not an expert, but I do know this much. If you would like more searches, cuts and pastes, I could do that for you also, , but in all fairness, this is not the thread for the topic. Start a topic on itif you wish.


This is not so. In essence Arabic is like Aramaic and Hebrew in the formation of its words, and the double L clearly distinguishes it from words which contain a single L. It indicates two syllables, one ending in L and the other beginning in L. This is not true of ilah. Thus there is no way in which the words are even partially synonymous.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
i do listen to the apostles, we are apostoic! Just sayin
not if your catholic you do not.. sorry my friend, the roman church does not teach what the apostles taught, they took what the apostles taught, made an allegory of it. and made their own religion.

saying your apostolic does not mean it is true.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
not if your catholic you do not.. sorry my friend, the roman church does not teach what the apostles taught, they took what the apostles taught, made an allegory of it. and made their own religion.

saying your apostolic does not mean it is true.
The Church and I beg to differ
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
not if your catholic you do not.. sorry my friend, the roman church does not teach what the apostles taught, they took what the apostles taught, made an allegory of it. and made their own religion.

saying your apostolic does not mean it is true.
Sir, I know you have been taught some terrible propaganda and I'm sure you believe it. I know the propaganda you will use
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sir, I know you have been taught some terrible propaganda and I'm sure you believe it. I know the propaganda you will use
No.

I have studied the bible. I test words of everyone. I do not just listen blindly to anyone.

But believe what you want, your listen to men not God, or you would not worry about propoganda or anything else (actually the roman church has mastered the use of propoganda,)
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
No.

I have studied the bible. I test words of everyone. I do not just listen blindly to anyone.

But believe what you want, your listen to men not God, or you would not worry about propoganda or anything else (actually the roman church has mastered the use of propoganda,)
i continue to study the bible and have found Church doctrine sound
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
i continue to study the bible and have found Church doctrine sound
You must have a different bible then.

John 6 does not support your churches view of the eucharist. in fact it contradicts your churches view. this is enough in this one area to show your church has problems But no. you will not listen to God you place your church above the word of God. who uses two verses out of a whole conversation to make a doctrine which is pagan, not christian in its nature.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Sir, i study the faith and have seen the scriptures that prove the doctrine is sound. i am still not convinced that you know anything except the constant propaganda you use and sometimes out right hatred for the Church. In my studies this tells me a lot concerning character
Hebrews 11:1 defines faith. You study and trust Romanism. Cloaking your beliefs in indeterminate definitions is not a very prudent philosophy.

God said Job eschewed evil. Doctrine that draws souls away from Christ and blinds them to eternal condemnation meets my definition of evil.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
You must have a different bible then.

John 6 does not support your churches view of the eucharist. in fact it contradicts your churches view. this is enough in this one area to show your church has problems But no. you will not listen to God you place your church above the word of God. who uses two verses out of a whole conversation to make a doctrine which is pagan, not christian in its nature.
Sad to see another claiming they are God and can see into my heart and knows what I do. Just sad, that is blasphemy and heresy. And ya'll say I'm a heretic? Lol
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sad to see another claiming they are God and can see into my heart and knows what I do. Just sad, that is blasphemy and heresy. And ya'll say I'm a heretic? Lol
So your can believe different than the roman church? I did not know this..
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sad to see another claiming they are God and can see into my heart and knows what I do. Just sad, that is blasphemy and heresy. And ya'll say I'm a heretic? Lol

whats this have to do with John 6?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Lets addess the issue that you wrongly accuse me of placing the Church over God. Where is your proof of this blasphemy?
John 6 is the proof..just one part of the proof. thats why I mentioned it. but as most catholics, you do not want to discuss the word. just discuss how everyone is against you. and has no idea what you believe or what you think.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
John 6 is the proof..just one part of the proof. thats why I mentioned it. but as most catholics, you do not want to discuss the word. just discuss how everyone is against you. and has no idea what you believe or what you think.
Who's dodging now?