Chosen by God - A study in Election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
That's kind of where you went wrong in your discussion with me. My objection to Calvinist soteriology is almost always the qualifier. I am not opposed to the doctrine of election but that God does not have some condition by which He is selecting those whom He saves.
Yet the Bible is exceedingly clear that there are no necessary or adequate qualifications whatsoever.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Funny that you call saying salvation is based on actual justice "wobbly soteriology." In no way do I believe it is based on works, merit, or good deeds. But if you think you somehow do God a service by turning His justice into a random choice based on nothing other than whim with no real separation between those chosen for salvation and those chosen for damnation you really don't.
I think that you are perilously close to believing that actual justice is YOUR justice.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
A rather simple question, what precisely do you think Sproul is saying that I'm missing? In what manner do you think Sproul addresses my criticism?

Sproul claims the decree of reprobation is a "negative" decree, but that doesn't change that the only difference between the two groups with regard to salvation is God's decree so whether that is positive or negative it is still just as monstrous because of its capriciousness.
Maybe this will help......

 
Apr 2, 2020
1,144
425
83
I think that you are perilously close to believing that actual justice is YOUR justice.
Not at all, God is the judge and His methods are what they are. But there is no justice if there are no criteria, if there's no standard. Then it's just capriciousness and justice means absolutely nothing.

The issue is you've mistaken your soteriology which is based on human systematic theologies for God's actual methods. You've mistaken the philosophizing on Biblical texts by men like Augustine and Calvin as actual Biblical truth whether you've read them or not because it is what you have heard preached.

You ignore God calling numerous men righteous in favor of a quotation of a poem and other proof texts. You ignore God calling men to choose in favor of that same philosophizing.

God's justice is real justice, the righteous are saved and the wicked damned. Even if we can't see immediately who is and isn't wicked.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,747
29,106
113
No it is not. Double predestination is not a Calvinist view. Please bear in mind that I am not a Calvinist.
Can the non-elect then be saved?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Can the non-elect then be saved?
Frankly that is none of our business, and we should thank God for that.

Furthermore it's God's problem not our problem.

Moreover, since there are absolutely NO preconditions pertaining to salvation, then we can preach to every living creature with complete confidence and zero prejudice.

But beyond all of that there is no way that any human being could ever perceive who is elect and who is not, so as far as we're concerned everybody and anybody gets a free and fair shot at salvation.

Works for me!
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Not at all, God is the judge and His methods are what they are. But there is no justice if there are no criteria, if there's no standard. Then it's just capriciousness and justice means absolutely nothing.

The issue is you've mistaken your soteriology which is based on human systematic theologies for God's actual methods. You've mistaken the philosophizing on Biblical texts by men like Augustine and Calvin as actual Biblical truth whether you've read them or not because it is what you have heard preached.

You ignore God calling numerous men righteous in favor of a quotation of a poem and other proof texts. You ignore God calling men to choose in favor of that same philosophizing.

God's justice is real justice, the righteous are saved and the wicked damned. Even if we can't see immediately who is and isn't wicked.
Your issue is you set YOURSELF up as the judge. Setting standards. Elucidating lists of criteria. Fine-tuning the scales of justice. Declaring what is fair and right.

Pretty outrageous really.

I wouldn't touch any of that with a 10 foot pole.
 
Apr 2, 2020
1,144
425
83
Your issue is you set YOURSELF up as the judge. Setting standards. Elucidating lists of criteria. Fine-tuning the scales of justice. Declaring what is fair and right.

Pretty outrageous really.

I wouldn't touch any of that with a 10 foot pole.
It's not a matter of fairness, it's a matter of cohesion. If the word justice is to mean anything with regard to God it must differ from human justice not in kind but in degree.

If the soteriology you set up were true God could certainly call Himself just but the word would be meaningless. It wouldn't have any semantic value because it is entirely different from what we mean by justice.

You accuse me of setting myself up as the judge for pointing out the flaws in your system because as is common to Calvinists your pride is your doctrinal knowledge.

The only thing I judge is the idol set up by a human system. The monster that Calvinist soteriology tries to hoist in the place where only the true God properly sits.

You think by teaching that God saves some wicked while punishing another group that is no more guilty than those saved is somehow honoring God. You think that by distorting the attributes of God to the point where they have none of their common meaning is preserving God's doctrines, but instead you make the personal God impersonal and unknowable.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
It's not a matter of fairness, it's a matter of cohesion. If the word justice is to mean anything with regard to God it must differ from human justice not in kind but in degree.

If the soteriology you set up were true God could certainly call Himself just but the word would be meaningless. It wouldn't have any semantic value because it is entirely different from what we mean by justice.

You accuse me of setting myself up as the judge for pointing out the flaws in your system because as is common to Calvinists your pride is your doctrinal knowledge.

The only thing I judge is the idol set up by a human system. The monster that Calvinist soteriology tries to hoist in the place where only the true God properly sits.

You think by teaching that God saves some wicked while punishing another group that is no more guilty than those saved is somehow honoring God. You think that by distorting the attributes of God to the point where they have none of their common meaning is preserving God's doctrines, but instead you make the personal God impersonal and unknowable.
They make God morally ambigous.
It is a travesty and they hide behind, statements like "we cannot question God's ways."

R.C.Sproul and the Calvinite teachers make evil sound good and intellectual.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Your issue is you set YOURSELF up as the judge. Setting standards. Elucidating lists of criteria. Fine-tuning the scales of justice. Declaring what is fair and right.

Pretty outrageous really.

I wouldn't touch any of that with a 10 foot pole.
Strange how we mere humans understand what is just..... I wonder how we know better than your god.

Reminds me of another Calvinism heresy ..how we are to love those whom God hates... as though the believer is more moral than God?
 

Kolistus

Well-known member
Feb 3, 2020
538
276
63
Actually you could say more accurately that one group is CHOSEN for salvation and the other group is ABANDONED to damnation. Not CHOSEN to damnation. Why? Because they don't want to be saved. Because they love their sin. Because they resist the Holy Spirit. Because they commit the unpardonable sin. Maybe lots of similar things.

That is just some off-the-cuff commentary. Not meant to be doctrine. Nothing more than a reaction to what you have stated. Whether it makes sense or not, or is scriptural or not, I leave up to you.
Okay, they resisted the Holy Spirit they did not want to be saved, just like the elect? The only reason the elect eventually want those things is because God has elected them, and given them new hearts and repentance and faith. God could have done the same to those others who resisted the Holy Spirit, but did not.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Okay, they resisted the Holy Spirit they did not want to be saved, just like the elect? The only reason the elect eventually want those things is because God has elected them, and given them new hearts and repentance and faith. God could have done the same to those others who resisted the Holy Spirit, but did not.
A lot of the protestant creeds sound something like that.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Strange how we mere humans understand what is just..... I wonder how we know better than your god.

Reminds me of another Calvinism heresy ..how we are to love those whom God hates... as though the believer is more moral than God?
Humanly just or not the modus operandi is as follows:

John 6:65
And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”

6:37
Everyone the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will never drive away.

6:44
"No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Strange how we mere humans understand what is just..... I wonder how we know better than your god.

Reminds me of another Calvinism heresy ..how we are to love those whom God hates... as though the believer is more moral than God?
Justice? Or gracious gifts? That is the question.
I'll tell you what: you can have the justice and I will receive the gifts.

Matt 13:11
He replied, "The knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.

John 3:27
John replied, "A man can receive only what is given him from heaven.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Justice? Or gracious gifts? That is the question.
I'll tell you what: you can have the justice and I will receive the gifts.

Matt 13:11
He replied, "The knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.

John 3:27
John replied, "A man can receive only what is given him from heaven.
I'll tell you what: you can have the justice and I will receive the gifts.
Sad

And Jesus looked down form the cross and stated.... "Father forgive them they know not what they do."
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,662
8,205
113
Sad

And Jesus looked down form the cross and stated.... "Father forgive them they know not what they do."
Then one of the soldiers confessed Jesus as Lord. Are you a universalist or something?
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
Then one of the soldiers confessed Jesus as Lord. Are you a universalist or something?
No

Salvation is available to all .............not the selected few.

Either you buy all of Calvinism or not... it works as a system
 
Status
Not open for further replies.