I acknowledged that many have been taught a poor [i.e. INCORRECT] version of "pre-trib"... A version which states that "our Rapture" event is being referred to in Jesus' Olivet Discourse... but the fact is that "our Rapture" event was NOT the Subject of Jesus' Olivet Discourse and cannot be found ANYWHERE in His Olivet Discourse.
I agree with that, but I cannot see it anywhere else in scripture either. What I don't get is why you are still pretrib. I didn't see a case for it in the OT passage you mentioned earlier either.
Consider the similarities between Matthew 24 and II Thessalonians 2.
Matthew 24 II Thes. 2
-the love of many shall grow cold------> the falling away
-abomination of desolation stand------> the man of sin standing in the temple of God
in the holy place declaring himself that he is god
-the coming of the Son of man and-----> the coming of the Lord and
the gathering of the elect our gathering unto Him
Again, their Q of Him in v.3 was BASED ON what He had ALREADY spoken to them about in Matthew 13:24,30,39,40,49-50 (when the "angels" will REAP... [and will be said to the angels] "collect ye FIRST the TARES"... The Wheat and the Tares still growing together, planted on the earth, ALIVE--This does not pertain to either "our Rapture" NOR a "resurrection [from the DEAD]," see...)
How do you get Jesus coming back twice or a rapture before the tribulation out of any of this? How do you get an extra resurrection event before the first resurrection out of any of this?
There will still be people here before the tribulation, so the wicked will not be reaped beforehand.
Revelation associates harvest in this context with blood.
Revelation 14
19 And the angel thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God.
20 And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.
In II Thessalonians 1 shows us that when Jesus comes back executing vengeance on them that believe not, that the church will receive rest from it's tribulation and the will be glorified in the saints. Pre-trib has the saints resurrected, then wrath poured on the unbelievers... oh then there are some saints again. And those saints if they died get to be in the first resurrection. But wait... there was a resurrection before the first resurrection at the rapture. I just don't see the appeal to such a messy convoluted eschatology.
[the point being conveyed by this passage is that they DISREGARDED God's word VIA NOAH, and thus were taken away in the flood judgment; Noah and crew are a picture of those who will be protected THROUGH the trib years (whereas "Enoch" [ONE MAN]--interesting name-meaning, btw--is a picture or type of "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" [ONE BODY] caught up well-prior to the flood judgment coming on the earth)]
Now show me some scripture that shows that the rapture takes place ___before__ the tribulation. I've asked you for that previously.
Both Matthew 24 and II Thessalonians 2:1 refer to the coming of the Son of man/the Lord and the gathering. Do you agree with me that this gathering unto the Lord spoken of in II Thessalonians is the rapture?
Matthew 24
29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And He will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will
gather together His
elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. (NKJV)
Who does the Bible refer to as the elect? We can see that first century Christians are called the 'elect'.
2 Timothy 2:10
Therefore I endure all things for the sake of the
elect, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
II John 1
1 The Elder,
To the
elect lady and her children, whom I love in truth, and not only I, but also all those who have known the truth,
You don't have any scripture at all that teaches that Jesus is returning for the saints twice, or that the rapture is before the tribulation. II Thessalonians 2 shows us that the church is here suffering tribulation when Jesus comes and gives the church rest.
I could argue for three raptures and argue that the third one occurs after the giant green zipper appears in the sky and Gabriel unzips it. I could say, "This verse occurs before the zipping of the giant green zipper' and 'That verse occurs after the great green zipping.' But there is no scripture that teaches three second comings or the appearance of the giant green zipper, just as you have no scripture to support a pretribulational rapture or an extra return of Christ.
This is about those being "gathered together" (ONE BY ONE) which the OT had prophesied about (which will occur at the END OF / AFTER the trib yrs... at the "GREAT" trumpet... and they'll be gathered to ONE PLACE UPON THE EARTH [Not "to the MEETING OF THE LORD IN THE AIR" which is a distinct thing... a distinct trumpet... and distinct location and purpose... a distinct MANNER ["AS ONE" rather than "ONE BY ONE"], etc etc...).
I read the passage, and I dont' see how you try to make a correlation there. The Bible already tells of a gathering at the coming of the Lord, the rapture event spoken of in I Thessalonians 2:1.
At the time that Jesus spoke His Olivet Discourse, He had not yet spoken to them ANYTHING regarding or relating to "rapture [in the air]"
We do not know that, but what we do know is that He spoke to His own disciples about the coming of the Son of Man, taught them to be prepared for it. He told them of the gathering of the elect that would occur at His coming. There are parallels between Matthew 24.
You can make up an addition return of Christ with no scripture whatsover to back it up, then argue that some verses about the second coming apply to the additional return you made up and other verses refer to the one the Bible actually teaches about, but that is lousy hermeneutics.