And this is where your theory and science flops and becomes another religion to be believed.
LOL!
What exactly is "my theory"? That silence and darkness are the absence of sound and light? 'Fraid that's not "my theory"; that is the definition of the terms. And if you think that science fails because silence and darkness are the absence of sound and light, then you have another think coming.
You want to define silence as complete absence of sound and darkness as complete absence of light but you also want to explain how they both (light & darkness/ silence & sound) came about at big bang.
I don't "want" to define them in those terms, that is how they are defined, regardless of my desires. The fact that they only exist in contrast to sound and light is basically what you said yourself in your next post about how things only exist in contrast to their negation. Without the concepts of "sound" and "light," the concepts of "silence" and "darkness" are meaningless, so yes, they are dependent upon the existence of a universe in which sound and light exist.
Simple basics; silence and darkness amongst many other things are immaterial therefore can never be created or destroyed, yet they are part of reality of this universe and they don't depend on anything for them to be.
Like I said, silence and darkness are realities in the same way that the absence of leprechauns in your bathroom is a reality--but they do depend on the existence of sound and light for them to have meaning.
With this simple basics, i can perfectly describe the conditions before big bang (beginning);
No, you can't, because there is no "before" the beginning. That's what "the beginning" means. Are you even listening to yourself?
it was very dark and silent and very cold because the opposite of these requires material existence of substance
It wasn't ANYTHING, because before there was SOMETHING, there was nothing. There was no darkness, because there was no light to be absent. There was no silence, because there was no sound to be absent. There was no cold, because there was no heat to be absent. There was no time nor space in which anything could happen.
I know this is a difficult concept for our spacetime-bound brains to grasp--but there could be NOTHING before creation, because there was nothing and no time for it to happen.
Defining silence as absence of sound and darkness as absence of light is also not correct, it is like defining a tree as an unprocessed furniture.
Well, you can argue with Merriam-Webster on that one. Whether you like them or not, those ARE the definitions of "silence" and "darkness."
darkness is un-created while light came into existence
It would be more accurate to say that the concept of darkness came into existence when light was created.
you can not use light in the definition of darkness
You can't? lol
You pretty much HAVE to... but I'm curious. Please define the concept darkness for me, without any reference to the concept of light.
Please define the concept of silence for me, without any reference to the concept of sound.
it would mean that before light existed, darkness could not be defined or described.
BINGO!!!
My point exactly...