B
Jesus says the word of God is seed, and Peter calls it incorruptible seed. Now whose ignoring the whole counsel of God? Jesus also says satan sows tares. Why do you feel obliged to deny the obvious four seeds in Genesis 2- 4?
But who is ignoring the context of Gen 3? Why are you ignoring God's specific words in their post-fall context? By bringing NON-RELEVANT passages into Gen 3 -- passages that would be historically irrelevant to the
original audience, you are in fact reading into specific passage because you don't like the implications of what the passage itself is teaching. This is a HUGE hermeneutical faux pas! For it our duty to be FAITHFUL to the Word and in order to do that we must make every attempt to understand any given passage in its historical context
the way the original audience would have understood it! For example, do you think A&E would have understood God's words to the Serpent the way you try to disingenuously spin them -- by adding to them what isn't in the actual passage itself!? Or do you think the ancient Jews who had Genesis handed down to them over the centuries would have understood them the way you try to spin the passage?
By adding words to a passage, in order to support your own personal theological agenda, they serve to only hopelessly confuse the clear meaning of the passage. It's one thing to bring highly relevant, pertinent passages to bear upon another text that would help shed light upon it; but it's something altogether different to try to intentionally make obscure the true meaning by adding irrelevant passages. And how we can always distinguish between the two approaches is with the original audience test -- and for that matter with the original writer's intentions and his understanding would have been.
We must always place ourselves into the historical context of any given passage. We must always stand in the shoes of the original audience -- and forget the year we're living in. This is the only honest way to interpret scripture.
So...with that said, maybe you would want to take up Mr. Studier's slack and and explain how the Two Seeds among the three moral entities (besides God) in the Garden works? Who is the godly seed and who is the seed of the Serpent? Or...are they both ungodly? (That would be Door Number Three).
P.S. I suppose one could "reason" (used in the loosest sense possible) that they're both godly seeds...even though that would be over the cliff.