Plainly you do not know scripture. Please do not take my word for it. Go and read each account, and physically draw a picture of what you read and it will be bltantly obvious to you....
Hi DiscileAG,
Thank you for your comments, I am very aware of the resurrection narratives.
Just imagine you where at a football (soccer) match, and on each stand (north,east,south and west) there was a reporter. Now, the four reporters had to write a running commentary for their respective newspaper sports column of the football match they had just watched. Would each report be the exact same word for word? of course not! Yet all four reporters would describe the same 90 minutes of hopefully good football as it was played and all the maybe 40 - 60 thousand fans could read these four accounts and agree with the different reports of the same match!
Matt gives us a nice fuller account.. Mark gives us the same version but it has been edited down (most agree Mark was written first) as his gospel is short and concise. John John doesn't even mention the earthquake or the rolling back of the stone nor mentions Mary the mother of James and salome yet his account is in agreement..and Luke cuts parts that are in the other gospels and add some detail aswell. Four different accounts of the same episode written in a different way.
What you neglect DiscilePAG is the main thrust of the four narratives at this point and that is..
He is Risen
Update: I forgot to mention I would be very worried about the validity of the narrative text we are referring to if they all said the exact same thing in the exact same manner...can you remember being in school...how did the teacher know if someone cheated??? where not the exam papers the exact same?