Disproving Biblical Infallibility 101

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
#21
But the whole Bible is supposed to be inspired and without error. If the resurrection account can be filled with mistakes due to whoever is reporting what they thought, then the rest of scripture must be so. It is not supposed to be like other events in life where there are differences in which facts are recalled. This is supposed to be what the Holy Spirit is inspiring them to write so the OP is correct.

This is not to deny anything about the truth of miraculous happenings, just to say that every word of scripture is not from the pen of God as it were, but from men who get facts and order of events wrong at times.
Read post #13 again. Marc spells it out quite nicely.
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#22
He spells out the root word descended. He fails to pay attention to the other complete details that in no way agree. There is more to what we are talking about than the angel "descending", ie...when he spoke, the location from which he spoke, the time frame in which he spoke, and the whole slew of details mentioned in the OP.
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#24
But the whole Bible is supposed to be inspired and without error. If the resurrection account can be filled with mistakes due to whoever is reporting what they thought, then the rest of scripture must be so. It is not supposed to be like other events in life where there are differences in which facts are recalled. This is supposed to be what the Holy Spirit is inspiring them to write so the OP is correct.

This is not to deny anything about the truth of miraculous happenings, just to say that every word of scripture is not from the pen of God as it were, but from men who get facts and order of events wrong at times.

THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO SEES IT.
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#25
The foundation doctrine that Jesus died and rose again is shaky at best? Maybe for some.
Who can tell what is solid, seeing that the doctrine of the ressurection is based only in faith due to the actual scriptural accounts being flawed?
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#26
Change thread title to appearing foolish 101
Well its plain to see your quick to call someone foolish. Please tell me what is foolish about the truth? Truth is this- the scriptures are NOT infallible, and i have, in a school fashion- proved such. Any red blooded human who can read has admitted that there are differences there. What i am asking, is why.

If you do not have a legitimate statement or question- please keep your rude posts to yourself. Thank you.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#27
If I can't trust one word in my Bible, what makes me trust the rest of it? This type of wrong thinking that you cannot trust every Word of God in your Bible is just a person wanting to doubt God's Word. You either believe all of it or you don't. God's Word is not something we get to pick and choose in what we want to believe in. This is how Biblical cults are formed. For it takes faith to believe in all of God's Word. Whatever you choose not to believe in Scripture, the seed of the Word will not find it's place in your heart so as to produce fruit.
 
Last edited:
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#28
Four first hand accounts by men who were there and now you want to quibble over the differences in their accounts? Enjoy and relish the differences and the richness it adds to the accounts. Not copies with machinelike precision but human accounts from men in the presence of God Almighty.

Only God can make all the snowflakes the same yet different and unique. Just like He made you.

For the cause of Christ
Roger


Roger, you do admit there are differences- which equals fallibility. If they do not agree- they disagree. Why would the story have ANY differences being Holy Spirit inspired??
 

Hepzibah

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2015
337
24
18
#29
THE ONLY PERSON HERE WHO SEES IT.
Probably cos l'm an aspergers! We can see facts without emotions getting in the way. It is probably too overpowering for folk to see it and admit it. Only psychopaths and aspies can judge like this lol
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,345
2,157
113
#31
They don'y say anything different..they just say it in a different way.
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
#32
He spells out the root word descended. He fails to pay attention to the other complete details that in no way agree. There is more to what we are talking about than the angel "descending", ie...when he spoke, the location from which he spoke, the time frame in which he spoke, and the whole slew of details mentioned in the OP.
The people were so in awe of what transpired they were unable to gather their thoughts completely accurately, yet the bottom line remains the same, Christ is Risen. The Disciples were killed for their testimonies; Peter allowed himself to be crucified upside down for crying out loud. If Christ's Resurrection did not happen don't you think they would have fessed up? Christ is Risen! Deal with it!
 

Hepzibah

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2015
337
24
18
#33
Jason

Spiritual truth and human error can be discerned by the spiritual.
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#35
They don'y say anything different..they just say it in a different way.
Plainly you do not know scripture. Please do not take my word for it. Go and read each account, and physically draw a picture of what you read and it will be bltantly obvious to you....
 

Hepzibah

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2015
337
24
18
#36
No one is doubting the truth of what happened. Christ is risen. But the record shows that men's errors are in scripture too.
 
Jun 21, 2015
151
0
0
#37
The people were so in awe of what transpired they were unable to gather their thoughts completely accurately, yet the bottom line remains the same, Christ is Risen. The Disciples were killed for their testimonies; Peter allowed himself to be crucified upside down for crying out loud. If Christ's Resurrection did not happen don't you think they would have fessed up? Christ is Risen! Deal with it!
I agree, Christ is risen. But the scriptures are fallible. So please speak to my OP...how are we to know what doctrine is solid seeing how we can plainly see scripture has errors?
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
#38
Regarding Saul's conversion:

And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one.
Acts 9:7

And those who were with me indeed saw the light and were afraid,[SUP] [/SUP]but they did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me. Acts 22:9

Saul's conversion is factual regardless of possible discrepancies in its account.

Faith -- you either have it or you don't, and Jesus is Lord, regardless.
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
#39
I agree, Christ is risen. But the scriptures are fallible. So please speak to my OP...how are we to know what doctrine is solid seeing how we can plainly see scripture has errors?
Please take my consideration and pray about it. If your hearts yearns for it as it seems, God will open doors for you to discover the Truth to your satisfaction, and maybe, just maybe, God will call you to share your wisdom in a glorious manner.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,345
2,157
113
#40
Plainly you do not know scripture. Please do not take my word for it. Go and read each account, and physically draw a picture of what you read and it will be bltantly obvious to you....
Hi DiscileAG,

Thank you for your comments, I am very aware of the resurrection narratives.

Just imagine you where at a football (soccer) match, and on each stand (north,east,south and west) there was a reporter. Now, the four reporters had to write a running commentary for their respective newspaper sports column of the football match they had just watched. Would each report be the exact same word for word? of course not! Yet all four reporters would describe the same 90 minutes of hopefully good football as it was played and all the maybe 40 - 60 thousand fans could read these four accounts and agree with the different reports of the same match!


Matt gives us a nice fuller account.. Mark gives us the same version but it has been edited down (most agree Mark was written first) as his gospel is short and concise. John John doesn't even mention the earthquake or the rolling back of the stone nor mentions Mary the mother of James and salome yet his account is in agreement..and Luke cuts parts that are in the other gospels and add some detail aswell. Four different accounts of the same episode written in a different way.

What you neglect DiscilePAG is the main thrust of the four narratives at this point and that is..


He is Risen :)


Update: I forgot to mention I would be very worried about the validity of the narrative text we are referring to if they all said the exact same thing in the exact same manner...can you remember being in school...how did the teacher know if someone cheated??? where not the exam papers the exact same?
 
Last edited: