If we're going to ask a question based on the word "created"... we need to define the world.
It can mean different things, and be used in different ways.
Examples:
A. God can create a universe out of nothingness
B. God can create a living being (Adam) out of the inorganic elements of the earth
C. I can create a chair out of wood, a substance which is fully formed, and entirely ready to be used by man.
D. I can something "indirectly" by hiring contractors to build a house... in one sense I "created" it, and in another sense I did not.
E. I can also create abstract ideas, which aren't physical at all, and write them down.
* There are many ways we use the word "create."
* There is also a distinction between words like "created", "formed", and "made".
We can't argue about whether or not something is "created" until we first decide upon precisely what "created" means.
In what way are we choosing to use that word?
If we don't define how we're using the word... we're all arguing about a lot of nothing.
And yes, this IS how proper theology is done.
It can mean different things, and be used in different ways.
Examples:
A. God can create a universe out of nothingness
B. God can create a living being (Adam) out of the inorganic elements of the earth
C. I can create a chair out of wood, a substance which is fully formed, and entirely ready to be used by man.
D. I can something "indirectly" by hiring contractors to build a house... in one sense I "created" it, and in another sense I did not.
E. I can also create abstract ideas, which aren't physical at all, and write them down.
* There are many ways we use the word "create."
* There is also a distinction between words like "created", "formed", and "made".
We can't argue about whether or not something is "created" until we first decide upon precisely what "created" means.
In what way are we choosing to use that word?
If we don't define how we're using the word... we're all arguing about a lot of nothing.
And yes, this IS how proper theology is done.