Fallacies of the Present Day Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
God wills all to be saved. Jesus does the will of the Father. Simple...
I state again, my does not require your belief or assistance.


2 Timothy 2:12-16

12*If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us:

13*If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

14*Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.

15*Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

16*But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
You are the one who babbles.
You are the one who sees no need for the cross.
You are the one who states anyway to heaven is the right way.
You say, "when have I said that?" By your insistence that any and all are among the beloved.
In this you are wrong.
Your right, you don't need my help.
You need Jesus. You need to find out there is a war in the heavenlies; and there is a wide road that leads to destruction - (not my words, but Jesus' gospel).
As I said, we are speaking two different languages AoM.
Now, peace be unto you and let's not cloud the thread.
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
They were killed for the same reason you look to now atleast "kill" my credibility. Because there is no PROFIT!

You are so wrong. They were killed because they brought the Life of a Savior who is antithetical to the god of this world.
Don't make your 'credibility' equal with their sacrifice.
You have no 'credibility', have you resisted unto blood?
I didn't think so.

That's the WHOLE point! TRUE remission of sin is DEATH!

And why is my credibility any less valid then they? I hold to the faith once delivered to them, and I HAVEN'T SEEN!

And how am I wrong? What you stated is one branch of its manifestation, but the ROOT is money, and profit!

Remember no buying our selling unless you have the mark!
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
I'm so weary of false doctrine.
I grow weary of the non understanding of what is plainly stated for "whosoever will".
I can't believe how easily and often vain philosophies and doctrines of demons mess with people's minds; and entraps their souls.
You sure don't grow weary of making things up.

Let's say you are preparing the dough for some bread rolls for baking and I come over your house and notice that your recipe lacks a leavening agent. If I were to point this error out would you respond by telling me I didn't know what I was talking about and then proceed to tell me how to correctly roast a chicken?

You respond by making allusions that I deny Jesus died for the sins of mankind and that I am saying that he was "merely" a teacher. Do you make these false assertions on purpose or are you doing it through ignorance?

Let me make it plain.

I deny the PENAL SUBSTITUTION VIEW of the atonement.

I DO NOT deny the atonement.

I deny that WRATH OF GOD WAS POURED OUT ON JESUS.

I DO NOT deny that Jesus suffered on the behalf of sinners whereby he presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering.

I deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent.




Fallacies of Penal Substitution.

1. Penal Substitution denies that God forgives sins but merely appropriates the sins to an innocent who is then punished so that the guilty can be excused.

2. Penal Substitution logically necessitates a Limited Atonement because the same sins cannot be punished twice (double jeopardy). Therefore those who are lost cannot have had Jesus pay their due penalty. If Jesus died for everyone, according to Penal Substitution, then salvation would be universal.

3. Penal Substitution is logically a license to sin because with the penalty having been paid for all sin (past, present and future) it cannot be made due again. Thus those who have had their sins "paid for" can sin with impunity.

4. Penal Substitution is a reformed teaching which is only about 400 years old. It was never taught in the early church. Penal Substitution was a further development of Anselm's "Satisfaction Model" where taught that Jesus died to Satisfy Divine Justice. The Reformers added a Penal aspect (many were lawyers) to this teaching and thus taught that the death of Christ Satisfied God's Wrath.

5. If Penal Substitution is true then sin and virtue are transferable properties rather than being moral choices.

6. There is no scripture reference in the entire Bible which states that God PUNISHED Jesus as a substitute for the sinner.

7. Jesus did not teach anywhere that He was going to offer Hmself as a "wrath substitute" for the sinner.

8. Jesus taught that both James and John would drink of the same cup that Jesus drank from (Mar 10:38).
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
No it wasn't about money.
Money is small change in the spirit realm.
It's about souls.
You are mixing again.
Don't mix messages.
Excuse me, but I will let you get the last word,......as I don't want to cloud up this
forum (which is completely unrelated), with anymore of this inane conversation back and forth between us.
These things you should already know.
It's Christianity 101.
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
You are the one who babbles.
You are the one who sees no need for the cross.
You are the one who states anyway to heaven is the right way.
You say, "when have I said that?" By your insistence that any and all are among the beloved.
In this you are wrong.
Your right, you don't need my help.
You need Jesus. You need to find out there is a war in the heavenlies; and there is a wide road that leads to destruction - (not my words, but Jesus' gospel).
As I said, we are speaking two different languages AoM.
Now, peace be unto you and let's not cloud the thread.
Genesis 1:26-27; 31

26*And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27*So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

31*And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was VERY GOOD. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.


Who are "THEM" that God made in His image? He declared "THEM" VERY GOOD. Was He wrong, or in the end does this HAVE to stand as the Word that went out of His mouth?
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
No it wasn't about money.
Money is small change in the spirit realm.
It's about souls.
You are mixing again.
Don't mix messages.
Excuse me, but I will let you get the last word,......as I don't want to cloud up this
forum (which is completely unrelated), with anymore of this inane conversation back and forth between us.
These things you should already know.
It's Christianity 101.

The problem is you only see "money" as paper dollars. Paul profited in the "true" religion of his day as well.

No. You rob God of souls, withholding life by means of gains by the law.


Ezekiel 18:1-4

18*The word of the Lord came unto me again, saying,

2*What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?

3*As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Israel.

4*Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.



And behold! For all have SINNED!
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
I deny the PENAL SUBSTITUTION VIEW of the atonement.
I DO NOT deny the atonement.

I deny that WRATH OF GOD WAS POURED OUT ON JESUS.

I DO NOT deny that Jesus suffered on the behalf of sinners whereby he presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering.

I deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent.


So let me get this straight.
You don't deny that Jesus suffered on behalf of sinners whereby He presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering:
But you DO deny the wrath of God was poured out on Jesus. (Kind of makes the sacrifice pointless doesn't it?)

And you say you deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent?
Is that what you said? Well if it is, then I agree with you.......
God didn't take on Himself the sins of the world because they were innocent, in that we are in agreement.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
The problem is you only see "money" as paper dollars. Paul profited in the "true" religion of his day as well.
No. You rob God of souls, withholding life by means of gains by the law.

AoM, you are a true babbler.
You accuse not knowing what accusations you make.
So you say the Apostle Paul was in it for the money?
I'm glad to have finally gotten that rotten spirit to the surface, "beloved".
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
The problem is you only see "money" as paper dollars. Paul profited in the "true" religion of his day as well.
No. You rob God of souls, withholding life by means of gains by the law.

AoM, you are a true babbler.
You accuse not knowing what accusations you make.
So you say the Apostle Paul was in it for the money?
I'm glad to have finally gotten that rotten spirit to the surface, "beloved".


Again you only see "dollars". There is more ways to make a profit.

Galatians 1:10-16

10*For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.

11*But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.

12*For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

13*For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:

14*And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

15*But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,

16*To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:



How did Paul profit in what was the premier religion of his day?
 

loveme1

Senior Member
Oct 30, 2011
8,090
191
63
Something to consider.


Take all the money of this world and burn it.


What would happen?

Other than a very big fire.....

Nothing.

The system is in place through disobedience.

It was never about the money always about the control.




How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

15Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

16They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;

17That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?

18All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house.

19But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.

20Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.

21Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
Again, I only see spirit!
You are the one who sees $.
Reread my posts and answer again. (this time rightly)
Go and find fault with Paul(in your own mind), just don't do it on this thread.
Paul suffered for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was stoned and left for dead for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was beaten with rods three times for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was whipped five times with 39 lashes(195 total), for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was shipwrecked 3 times on missionary journeys spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was imprisoned oft, hungry oft, beset by trials within (the body of believers), and without(the world); for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was eventually killed by Nero for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
So don't you talk about money, or religious affiliations concerning the Apostle Paul!
He did it out of Love!

Stop babbling to your own hurt! - (Know you not those words you just posted will be required of you!)
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
The last post was for AoM.
Consider yourself warned.
You speak as a barbarion 'beloved'.
I'm just glad the spirit controlling you finally surfaced.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
I had to repost this because of all needless wrangling going on between me and a universalist.

You sure don't grow weary of making things up.

Let's say you are preparing the dough for some bread rolls for baking and I come over your house and notice that your recipe lacks a leavening agent. If I were to point this error out would you respond by telling me I didn't know what I was talking about and then proceed to tell me how to correctly roast a chicken?

You respond by making allusions that I deny Jesus died for the sins of mankind and that I am saying that he was "merely" a teacher. Do you make these false assertions on purpose or are you doing it through ignorance?

Let me make it plain.
I deny the PENAL SUBSTITUTION VIEW of the atonement.
I DO NOT deny the atonement.
I deny that WRATH OF GOD WAS POURED OUT ON JESUS.
I DO NOT deny that Jesus suffered on the behalf of sinners whereby he presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering.

I deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent.




Fallacies of Penal Substitution.

1. Penal Substitution denies that God forgives sins but merely appropriates the sins to an innocent who is then punished so that the guilty can be excused.

2. Penal Substitution logically necessitates a Limited Atonement because the same sins cannot be punished twice (double jeopardy). Therefore those who are lost cannot have had Jesus pay their due penalty. If Jesus died for everyone, according to Penal Substitution, then salvation would be universal.

3. Penal Substitution is logically a license to sin because with the penalty having been paid for all sin (past, present and future) it cannot be made due again. Thus those who have had their sins "paid for" can sin with impunity.

4. Penal Substitution is a reformed teaching which is only about 400 years old. It was never taught in the early church. Penal Substitution was a further development of Anselm's "Satisfaction Model" where taught that Jesus died to Satisfy Divine Justice. The Reformers added a Penal aspect (many were lawyers) to this teaching and thus taught that the death of Christ Satisfied God's Wrath.

5. If Penal Substitution is true then sin and virtue are transferable properties rather than being moral choices.

6. There is no scripture reference in the entire Bible which states that God PUNISHED Jesus as a substitute for the sinner.

7. Jesus did not teach anywhere that He was going to offer Hmself as a "wrath substitute" for the sinner.

8. Jesus taught that both James and John would drink of the same cup that Jesus drank from (Mar 10:38).

Skinski said -
I deny the PENAL SUBSTITUTION VIEW of the atonement.
I DO NOT deny the atonement.

I deny that WRATH OF GOD WAS POURED OUT ON JESUS.

I DO NOT deny that Jesus suffered on the behalf of sinners whereby he presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering.

I deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent.


So let me get this straight.
You don't deny that Jesus suffered on behalf of sinners whereby He presented Himself, without spot, as a propitiatory sin offering:
But you DO deny the wrath of God was poured out on Jesus. (Kind of makes the sacrifice pointless doesn't it?)

And you say you deny that God punishes the innocent in order to excuse the innocent?
Is that what you said? Well if it is, then I agree with you.......
God didn't take on Himself the sins of the world because they were innocent, in that we are in agreement.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
I think I'll continue on since I have so little resistance.
Skinski - Black RickShafer - Red
Fallacy 3: God Transferred Jesus Righteousness and Obedience to you when you believed by faith......
(We shall see)
No where in the Scriptures does it actually say that the righteousness of Christ is transferred to you by passive faith(notice the qualifier - 'passive'........no where in scripture does the term 'passive faith' occur either) – only by conjecture can this be proven. On the contrary, the Bible does say “he who DOES what is right is righteous” (1 Jn. 3:7) and that “the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself” (Ezk. 3:20).(Notice he reverts to the O.T. to prove his point) Virtue, like vice is NON- transferable since they both originate with the will. Therefore, the idea of Jesus swapping moral track records with those who trust in the provision is mythical.Here, the author equates Jesus with fallen man. No one ever taught this in early times, instead, they taught one was made righteous by obeying the teachings of Christ by freewill. Nothing was “positional” or “forensic” (that is ALL Reformed terminology, which traces back to Augustine – NOT the Early Christians!). Well.... let's prove his claim with scripture, shall we? "And hath raised us up together, and made us SIT together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus"- Ephesians 2:6. Does that sound volitional? Did we make ourselves sit together in heavenly places by our right doing? Or was it God who MADE us sit,(rest)? If one were justified, then they were also sanctified.How very Calvinistic of you, because that is what he claimed(according to I Cor. 1:30), because he said one couldn't have 'part' of Christ. Yet today, because the majority embrace Augustinian exegesis on original sin, they separate justification and sanctification and hold to some sort of Covenantal Representational theory (Reformed doctrine).Again, I will go back to scripture, but this time a different one - "Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me" - Psalms 51:5.The author of this thread would say, 'No original sin there, just a prophet/king being conceived......etc.,etc.' What this has birthed is the Carnal Christian idea among many other errors. People are told that through mere belief,(through MERE belief, like that very belief is not a gift from God, but some disingenuous 'effort' on the part of luciferian man! God transfers the obedience and righteousness of Christ to their account, thereby making them positionally righteous in His sight and Eternally Secure by a moment of faith (the trick here is to understand that the sin NATURE remains in tact after regeneration, which means, the saved will continue to sin daily in thought, word and deed without any more condemnation!).He says 'Aauugghh'!!! (See how he presupposes that any 'faith' is just from the soul of unregenerate man and therefore will yield the coldest of hearts and the dirtiest of reprobates? See how the author regards faith? As almost a dirty thing that is cajoled up out of the heart of lost mankind as man's substitute for 'Godly' righteousness? How he doesn't know that faith itself is a gift from God is beyond me. - (Read any part of the Pauline epistles to see where the Apostle Paul said faith originates from, there are over 140 references to faith.....I assure you it's not from the heart of man. One must now rest in this arrangement (which they will IF they are truly elect, but won’t if they are not, which would prove they were NEVER saved to begin with!) At the core of this teaching is a Representation Theory. The idea here is that Adam’s guilt and sinful nature are transmitted to his offspring through natural reproduction.Wrong again, it is through a fallen spirit(dead spirit, serving the deceiver) (Concupiscence is the proof of this.) Thus, all men and women are BORN sinners, that is, with concupiscence – no exceptions (except for Jesus!). (How you build on sand!)Since man comes into the world in this Totally Depraved condition, he is now wholly incapable of obeying God! So under this teaching Christ now appears as the Believers Representative (rather than example!). Every iota of His life is NOT carried out for His servants to learn from and FOLLOW, instead, His human existence was simply accomplished in order to achieve what no man could (being born a SINNER) before He came: Righteousness! !!!!SEE THIS!!!!(Keep in mind there are more than plenty examples of persons who were FOUND righteous before the advent of Christ which is WHY this teaching is a fallacy when broken down!)!!!!DID YOU SEE THAT?!!! Who was righteous? Who do you say could break the seventh seal? Again, who was completely without sin? Need I go on?! To sum it all up, by the believer “trusting” that Jesus obeyed for them and was righteous so they don’t have to be,Again, who said anything about 'have to be', the believer wouldn't even let this thought enter into their mind. The Holy Spirit changes their nature. they are no longer obligated to do anything since it has already been done in advance! Thus, to be a DOER of the word is now to show contempt towards the finished work of Christ and to ultimately fall from grace (which of course they will have to say you were never a partaker of to begin with, or they have to admit salvation is conditional!)
What a complete load of heretical rubbish!

Skinski said:
Every iota of His life is NOT carried out for His servants to learn from and FOLLOW(which is Skinski's claim for the reason Jesus came), instead, His human existence was simply accomplished in order to achieve what no man could (being born a SINNER) before He came: Righteousness! !!!!SEE THIS!!!!(Keep in mind there are more than plenty examples of persons who were FOUND righteous before the advent of Christ which is WHY this teaching is a fallacy when broken down!)!!!!DID YOU SEE THAT?!!
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
For the purpose of acknowledging that God is absolute lucidity, here is what the Bible actually explains regarding the OP “Fallacy” premises.


True.
“Therefore, just as through one man [Adam] sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned…” (Romans 5:12)



True.
…“in Jesus Christ Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation [substitution]… for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God” (Romans 3:25).



True.
“For You are not the God Who delights in wickedness; evil cannot lodge with You… You hate all evil doers” (Psalms 5:4-5)

“…the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience (Ephesians 5:6)

“He [Jesus] was delivered [by God] over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification” (Romans 4:25).

“He [Jesus] Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were healed” (1 Peter 2:24).



True.
”He [God] made Him [Jesus] who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him” (2 Corinthians 5:21).



True. The entire doctrine of Justification rests upon the complete obedience and absolute righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ. THANK YOU, LORD!! Maranatha! ☺

…“This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe” (Romans 3:22).

“Now to Him (God) Who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to make you stand in the presence of His glory blameless with great joy, to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen” (Jude 1:24-25).

“Being found in appearance as a man, He [Jesus] humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross” (Philippians 2:8).

“For as through the one man's [Adam’s] disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One [Jesus] the many will be made righteous” (Romans 5:19).




True.
“For this reason He [JESUS] is the Mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance” (Hebrews 9:15).



True.
“In the case of a will, it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one who made it is living” (Hebrews 9:16-17).

“Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Romans 8:1).




Correct.
The OP premise is indeed a fallacy, for the such is NOT Bible doctrine.
“God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” (Romans 6:2)
Actually, justification rests squarely on our belief (faith) in the finished work of Christ rather than on the finished work themselves. Thus, it is entirely possible that one's faith could be rendered useless if indeed that person possesses wrong ideas concerning the finished work of Christ on the cross.

In fact, that seems to the underlying theme of this thread. People potentially possessing wrong ideas which could possibly sabotage their faith rendering it useless.
 
B

BananaPie

Guest
Only if you tell me what hell is.

Q. What is Hell?

a) Hell is the opposite realm outside the Kingdom of God.

b) Hell is precisely where God does NOT dwell.

c) Hell is the complete state of rebellion of the damned.

d) All of the above.

Answer: d) All of the above. :D
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0

Q. What is Hell?

a) Hell is the opposite realm outside the Kingdom of God.

b) Hell is precisely where God does NOT dwell.

c) Hell is the complete state of rebellion of the damned.

d) All of the above.

Answer: d) All of the above. :D
a. The kingdom is WITHIN us and comes not by observation, so by this EVERYTHING OUTSIDE of what's within us fits this.

b. Again to be present in the body is to be absent from the Lord.

c. Children of rebellion will end there, being those of the flesh, will have their end here.
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
Again, I only see spirit!
You are the one who sees $.
Reread my posts and answer again. (this time rightly)
Go and find fault with Paul(in your own mind), just don't do it on this thread.
Paul suffered for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was stoned and left for dead for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was beaten with rods three times for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was whipped five times with 39 lashes(195 total), for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was shipwrecked 3 times on missionary journeys spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was imprisoned oft, hungry oft, beset by trials within (the body of believers), and without(the world); for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
He was eventually killed by Nero for the gospel of Jesus Christ!
So don't you talk about money, or religious affiliations concerning the Apostle Paul!
He did it out of Love!

Stop babbling to your own hurt! - (Know you not those words you just posted will be required of you!)

I'd wish you take your own advice. Again what Paul (as saul) did while in the jews religion was BEFORE he was seperated unto the gospel. You seem as though this is new for you.

Does not the bible say that the root of evil is MONEY?

So as in everything else here, Paul profited by his knowledge and gains according to the law..
 
May 29, 2012
530
1
0
The last post was for AoM.
Consider yourself warned.
You speak as a barbarion 'beloved'.
I'm just glad the spirit controlling you finally surfaced.

If my message is barbaric, being the peace of the gospel which passes all understanding, then what does that make your message in the annihilation of many?
 
M

marianna

Guest
a. The kingdom is WITHIN us and comes not by observation, so by this EVERYTHING OUTSIDE of what's within us fits this.
That is a corruption of that passage.
He was saying to THE PHARISEES He had cursed that the Kingdom of God was in THEIR MIDST - among them. Standing there. Yet they would not see it.

Can a fornicator who believes in Jesus keep fornicating believing he is in the Kingdom?