Flood - worldwide or local?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
Looks like the Fluddites are winning....:p
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Huh interesting, makes since, ocean water is quite salty, mountain water coming out of the mountain is filtered through rocks etc.. Evaporation is desalination of ocean water and destills fresh too. I can see that water being different than say ocean water.
Now imagine a tear in the earths crust so severe that it opens. and the fountains of water in the deep earth under extreme pressure, being released.. All the rock and water and plant life it would take with it as it is far into the earths atmosphere and some into deep space.. What it would cause. as it hit, like say the moon, Mars and Venus.. And the rocks that did nto hit them, what would happen to them..

"remember, just a theory"
 

Desertsrose

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2016
2,824
207
63
Answers in Genesis website

Evidence 1: Fossils of sea creatures high above sea level due to the ocean waters having flooded over the continents


We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
Focus in: High & Dry Sea Creatures

Evidence 2: Rapid burial of plants and animals

We find extensive fossil “graveyards” and exquisitely preserved fossils. For example, billions of nautiloid fossils are found in a layer within the Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This layer was deposited catastrophically by a massive flow of sediment (mostly lime sand). The chalk and coal beds of Europe and the United States, and the fish, ichthyosaurs, insects, and other fossils all around the world, testify of catastrophic destruction and burial.
Focus in: The World’s a Graveyard

Evidence 3: Rapidly deposited sediment layers spread across vast areas

We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents—even between continents—and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone and Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon can be traced across the entire United States, up into Canada, and even across the Atlantic Ocean to England. The chalk beds of England (the white cliffs of Dover) can be traced across Europe into the Middle East and are also found in the Midwest of the United States and in Western Australia. Inclined (sloping) layers within the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon are testimony to 10,000 cubic miles of sand being deposited by huge water currents within days.
Focus in: Transcontinental Rock Layers

Evidence 4: Sediment transported long distances

We find that the sediments in those widespread, rapidly deposited rock layers had to be eroded from distant sources and carried long distances by fast-moving water. For example, the sand for the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon (Arizona) had to be eroded and transported from the northern portion of what is now the United States and Canada. Furthermore, water current indicators (such as ripple marks) preserved in rock layers show that for “300 million years” water currents were consistently flowing from northeast to southwest across all of North and South America, which, of course, is only possible over weeks during a global Flood.
Focus in: Sand Transported Cross Country

Evidence 5: Rapid or no erosion between strata

We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion. For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon—the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation. Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it.
Focus in: No Slow and Gradual Erosion

Evidence 6: Many strata laid down in rapid succession

Rocks do not normally bend; they break because they are hard and brittle. But in many places we find whole sequences of strata that were bent without fracturing, indicating that all the rock layers were rapidly deposited and folded while still wet and pliable before final hardening. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone in Grand Canyon is folded at a right angle (90°) without evidence of breaking. Yet this folding could only have occurred after the rest of the layers had been deposited, supposedly over “480 million years,” while the Tapeats Sandstone remained wet and pliable.
Focus in: Rock Layers Folded, Not Fractured

What now?

The Bible’s history is reliable throughout—from the creation of man from the dust of the ground to the worldwide Flood to the coming of Jesus Christ. But just reading the evidence isn’t enough. The message of salvation founded in the Bible's history is also true, and, God wants us to accept the gift of salvationHe freely offers us.
The evidence is real. God has revealed Himself to us in His Word and in His creation (Romans 1:20).
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Answers in Genesis website

Evidence 1: Fossils of sea creatures high above sea level due to the ocean waters having flooded over the continents


We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
Focus in: High & Dry Sea Creatures

Evidence 2: Rapid burial of plants and animals

We find extensive fossil “graveyards” and exquisitely preserved fossils. For example, billions of nautiloid fossils are found in a layer within the Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This layer was deposited catastrophically by a massive flow of sediment (mostly lime sand). The chalk and coal beds of Europe and the United States, and the fish, ichthyosaurs, insects, and other fossils all around the world, testify of catastrophic destruction and burial.
Focus in: The World’s a Graveyard

Evidence 3: Rapidly deposited sediment layers spread across vast areas

We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents—even between continents—and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone and Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon can be traced across the entire United States, up into Canada, and even across the Atlantic Ocean to England. The chalk beds of England (the white cliffs of Dover) can be traced across Europe into the Middle East and are also found in the Midwest of the United States and in Western Australia. Inclined (sloping) layers within the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon are testimony to 10,000 cubic miles of sand being deposited by huge water currents within days.
Focus in: Transcontinental Rock Layers

Evidence 4: Sediment transported long distances

We find that the sediments in those widespread, rapidly deposited rock layers had to be eroded from distant sources and carried long distances by fast-moving water. For example, the sand for the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon (Arizona) had to be eroded and transported from the northern portion of what is now the United States and Canada. Furthermore, water current indicators (such as ripple marks) preserved in rock layers show that for “300 million years” water currents were consistently flowing from northeast to southwest across all of North and South America, which, of course, is only possible over weeks during a global Flood.
Focus in: Sand Transported Cross Country

Evidence 5: Rapid or no erosion between strata

We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion. For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon—the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation. Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it.
Focus in: No Slow and Gradual Erosion

Evidence 6: Many strata laid down in rapid succession

Rocks do not normally bend; they break because they are hard and brittle. But in many places we find whole sequences of strata that were bent without fracturing, indicating that all the rock layers were rapidly deposited and folded while still wet and pliable before final hardening. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone in Grand Canyon is folded at a right angle (90°) without evidence of breaking. Yet this folding could only have occurred after the rest of the layers had been deposited, supposedly over “480 million years,” while the Tapeats Sandstone remained wet and pliable.
Focus in: Rock Layers Folded, Not Fractured

What now?

The Bible’s history is reliable throughout—from the creation of man from the dust of the ground to the worldwide Flood to the coming of Jesus Christ. But just reading the evidence isn’t enough. The message of salvation founded in the Bible's history is also true, and, God wants us to accept the gift of salvationHe freely offers us.
The evidence is real. God has revealed Himself to us in His Word and in His creation (Romans 1:20).
but those fossils may well have been laid there when they were at sea level,

early beginnings of earth are vague and unknown

we know of mountain ranges in the last century which appeared over a short time. with fossils in them
 
Last edited:
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
251
0
Excellent prospective indeed, nothing says in scripture the whole earth was inhabited with people. Even today there's places on earth that no person lives even with a population of over 6 billion.
7 billion. Don't forget the illegals. Lol. And with respect, I believe it was a regional flood, but am always open to counter viewpoints.
 
Nov 19, 2016
502
23
0
Gen 6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

Gen 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

Gen 7:4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

Gen 7:10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
Gen 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Gen 7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

Gen 7:17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
Gen 7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
Gen 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.

Gen 7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
Gen 7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
Gen 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.

It appears as if it was world wide,but it would seem like people would not have spread out as far as all the way on the other side of the globe,but God said all living things on earth,so if there were any insects,or animals,on the other side of the planet they would have to go to,and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered with water,which there is mountains on the other side of the planet.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Gen 6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

Gen 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

Gen 7:4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

Gen 7:10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.
Gen 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Gen 7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

Gen 7:17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.
Gen 7:18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.
Gen 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.

Gen 7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
Gen 7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
Gen 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.

It appears as if it was world wide,but it would seem like people would not have spread out as far as all the way on the other side of the globe,but God said all living things on earth,so if there were any insects,or animals,on the other side of the planet they would have to go to,and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered with water,which there is mountains on the other side of the planet.
but the high hills under the whole heaven was only from the writer's viewpoint. This limited it to in and around Mesopotamia.

and 'the earth' could equally have been translated 'the land'.
 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48
Both, the earth wasn't divided into nations yet, the land was in one spot on the globe at that time it wasn't divided until after the tower of Babel. Genesis 10:32

"These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood."

As for the leaf, the rain stopped after 40 days and the water receded. Genesis 8:1-3 "Then God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the animals that were with him in the ark. And God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters subsided.The fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were also stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained. And the waters receded continually from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters decreased."

The water covered the whole earth. Genesis 8:9 "But the dove found no resting place for the sole of her foot, and she returned into the ark to him, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth. So he put out his hand and took her, and drew her into the ark to himself."
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Both, the earth wasn't divided into nations yet, the land was in one spot on the globe at that time it wasn't divided until after the tower of Babel. Genesis 10:32

"These were the families of the sons of Noah, according to their generations, in their nations; and from these the nations were divided on the earth after the flood."

As for the leaf, the rain stopped after 40 days and the water receded. Genesis 8:1-3 "Then God remembered Noah, and every living thing, and all the animals that were with him in the ark. And God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters subsided.The fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were also stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained. And the waters receded continually from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters decreased."

The water covered the whole earth. Genesis 8:9 "But the dove found no resting place for the sole of her foot, and she returned into the ark to him, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth. So he put out his hand and took her, and drew her into the ark to himself."
Of course if we translate as 'land' instead of 'earth' your argument falls flat
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
but the high hills under the whole heaven was only from the writer's viewpoint. This limited it to in and around Mesopotamia.

and 'the earth' could equally have been translated 'the land'.
Many believe the writer was moses.. Moses was not their, so it could not be his viewpoint, It was most likely what he was told. Not what he saw.

Again, for the reader. just because it can does not mean it has to.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Of course if we translate as 'land' instead of 'earth' your argument falls flat
No,, Land would be all earth above the water.. It still fits..
 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48
Of course if we translate as 'land' instead of 'earth' your argument falls flat
Are you sure about that, because the whole land was still in one area and the rest of the earth is always covered in water, not land, making the whole earth being covered in water. Using the word land helps my argument. The word land would debunk your argument, not mine.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Not only that the Global Flood has no basis in history, geology or common sense, it has also no basis in the Bible.

For example there is the "key" passage for the global flood:

"Does the Genesis text indicate that the flood was local? If you read it carefully, you can determine that the perspective is local. Most English translations are actually interpretations that are intentionally skewed to favor a global flood interpretation. For example, Genesis 7:20 is usually translated as:

The water prevailed fifteen cubits higher, and the mountains were covered. (Genesis 7:20)

In reality, the Hebrew word ma‛al, translated "higher" really means "upward." So, in essence, the text is saying that the flood was 15 cubits (20 feet) deep, in total, not 15 cubits above the mountains. In addition, the Hebrew word har really refers most often to hills rather than mountains."


The Genesis Flood: Why the Bible Says It Must be Local
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Not only that the Global Flood has no basis in history, geology or common sense, it has also no basis in the Bible.

For example there is the "key" passage for the global flood:

"Does the Genesis text indicate that the flood was local? If you read it carefully, you can determine that the perspective is local. Most English translations are actually interpretations that are intentionally skewed to favor a global flood interpretation. For example, Genesis 7:20 is usually translated as:

The water prevailed fifteen cubits higher, and the mountains were covered. (Genesis 7:20)

In reality, the Hebrew word ma‛al, translated "higher" really means "upward." So, in essence, the text is saying that the flood was 15 cubits (20 feet) deep, in total, not 15 cubits above the mountains. In addition, the Hebrew word har really refers most often to hills rather than mountains."


The Genesis Flood: Why the Bible Says It Must be Local
typical. It is not the only passage.

or reason.


[SUP]4 [/SUP]For after seven more days I will cause it to rain on the earth forty days and forty nights, and I will destroy from the face of the earth all living things that I have made.”

even if we replace earth with land, ALL still means all.. [SUP]19 [/SUP]And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. [SUP]20 [/SUP]The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered.

Here it does not say the high hills in a certain place on earth, it says again, ALL UNDER HEAVEN.

[SUP]21 [/SUP]And all flesh died that moved on the earth: birds and cattle and beasts and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, and every man. [SUP]22[/SUP]All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit[SUP][a][/SUP] of life, all that was on the dry land, died. [SUP]23 [/SUP]So He destroyed all living things which were on the face of the ground: both man and cattle, creeping thing and bird of the air. They were destroyed from the earth. Only Noah and those who were with him in the ark remained alive. [SUP]24 [/SUP]And the waters prevailed on the earth one hundred and fifty days.

Again all means all.. All who breath the air of life.. Even the harshest deserts today have living breathing creatures in them, So to say there is a spot of land that does not have life would be at the most, a grand assumption, either way, not based on fact.

This alone shows that your understanding that there is no way a global flood occurred is false.

why is it you people never want to discuss, But have to make demands? Your not helping your own case by putting your hand in peoples face..
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
typical. It is not the only passage.

or reason.


[SUP]4 [/SUP]For after seven more days I will cause it to rain on the earth forty days and forty nights, and I will destroy from the face of the earth all living things that I have made.”

even if we replace earth with land, ALL still means all.. [SUP]19 [/SUP]And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. [SUP]20 [/SUP]The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered.

Here it does not say the high hills in a certain place on earth, it says again, ALL UNDER HEAVEN.

[SUP]21 [/SUP]And all flesh died that moved on the earth: birds and cattle and beasts and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, and every man. [SUP]22[/SUP]All in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit[SUP][a][/SUP] of life, all that was on the dry land, died. [SUP]23 [/SUP]So He destroyed all living things which were on the face of the ground: both man and cattle, creeping thing and bird of the air. They were destroyed from the earth. Only Noah and those who were with him in the ark remained alive. [SUP]24 [/SUP]And the waters prevailed on the earth one hundred and fifty days.

Again all means all.. All who breath the air of life.. Even the harshest deserts today have living breathing creatures in them, So to say there is a spot of land that does not have life would be at the most, a grand assumption, either way, not based on fact.

This alone shows that your understanding that there is no way a global flood occurred is false.

why is it you people never want to discuss, But have to make demands? Your not helping your own case by putting your hand in peoples face..
Why people do not want to discuss with flat earth or global flood or young earth people? Well, because it does not have much sense...

Again, stop reading the Bible with your 21st century view of the planet. For them, earth was flat and "all heaven" was "all what they knew". It was not written by the astronaut from ISS.

Just switch this position and then you will see.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
"The translators of most English Bibles use the word "earth," which to us means "planet earth." However, their mistranslation can clearly be seen in the following passage:

Gen 8:5 And the water decreased steadily until the tenth month; in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, the tops of the mountains became visible.
Gen 8:6 Then it came about at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made;
Gen 8:7 and he sent out a raven, and it flew here and there until the water was dried up from the earth.
Gen 8:8 Then he sent out a dove from him, to see if the water was abated from the face of the land;
Gen 8:9 but the dove found no resting place for the sole of her foot, so she returned to him into the ark; for the water was on the surface of all the earth. Then he put out his hand and took her, and brought her into the ark to himself.

We see that in the tenth month, the mountains became visible to Noah (Genesis 8:5). Some 40+ days later (Genesis 8:6), Noah sent a dove out of the ark (Genesis 8:8). However, the dove was unable to land because of all the water (Genesis 8:9). Then, the text tells us that water was "on the surface of all the earth." This is obviously a bad translation of kol erets, since we know that the water had not covered the mountains for at least 40 days. The context makes it clear that kol erets must refer to local geography and should be translated as the "all the land" or "all the ground." In fact, all our major English translations (NASB, NIV, KJV, etc.) make this same error. It is no wonder that people who read the English translation of the Bible "literally" come to the conclusion that the flood must have been global. However, it is apparent that our English "translations" of the Genesis flood text are more than just "translations," but actually interpretations (and probably incorrect ones at that)."

The Genesis Flood: Why the Bible Says It Must be Local
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
It was global....regardless of those who deny it...PETER said the world that was PERISHED being overflowed with water and the world that NOW IS, IS reserved unto fire and judgment against ungodly men.........the verbiage is clear.....GOD will burn the whole world with the fire of his jealousy just as he destroyed the WHOLE WORLD by water.......and again many simply miss the fact that before the flood the earth consisted of one massive continent...it was in the days of PELEG (earthquake) which was after the food that the WORLD was divided into the continents that we now HAVE...the clues, verbiage and language is there, but overlooked, denied and or swept under the rug!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
"The translators of most English Bibles use the word "earth," which to us means "planet earth." However, their mistranslation can clearly be seen in the following passage:

Gen 8:5 And the water decreased steadily until the tenth month; in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, the tops of the mountains became visible.
Gen 8:6 Then it came about at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made;
Gen 8:7 and he sent out a raven, and it flew here and there until the water was dried up from the earth.
Gen 8:8 Then he sent out a dove from him, to see if the water was abated from the face of the land;
Gen 8:9 but the dove found no resting place for the sole of her foot, so she returned to him into the ark; for the water was on the surface of all the earth. Then he put out his hand and took her, and brought her into the ark to himself.

We see that in the tenth month, the mountains became visible to Noah (Genesis 8:5). Some 40+ days later (Genesis 8:6), Noah sent a dove out of the ark (Genesis 8:8). However, the dove was unable to land because of all the water (Genesis 8:9). Then, the text tells us that water was "on the surface of all the earth." This is obviously a bad translation of kol erets, since we know that the water had not covered the mountains for at least 40 days. The context makes it clear that kol erets must refer to local geography and should be translated as the "all the land" or "all the ground." In fact, all our major English translations (NASB, NIV, KJV, etc.) make this same error. It is no wonder that people who read the English translation of the Bible "literally" come to the conclusion that the flood must have been global. However, it is apparent that our English "translations" of the Genesis flood text are more than just "translations," but actually interpretations (and probably incorrect ones at that)."

The Genesis Flood: Why the Bible Says It Must be Local
again,, All it says is on the t4enth month, the mountains became visible.

It does not say they were visible before that time.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Why people do not want to discuss with flat earth or global flood or young earth people? Well, because it does not have much sense...

Again, stop reading the Bible with your 21st century view of the planet. For them, earth was flat and "all heaven" was "all what they knew". It was not written by the astronaut from ISS.

Just switch this position and then you will see.
no, People do not want to discuss is because of people like you. Who judge then based on presupposition, Theory and not based on fact.

I have already taken two points you made and put huge holes in them,, That becomes an issue for you to be so judgmental. Itproves your theory has flaws.. And even if it MAYbe right, it is not set in stone.

If you want to discuss it, I will discuss it, But if your going to be condescending and judgmental.. There will never be any discussion,
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Just switch this position and then you will see.

I was gap theorist.. So I did have a different position.. And I did see. Thats why I changed my view