EG, and Desired,
I have much respect and fondness for both of you: but it pains me to watch you talking past each other!
EG, Desired is saying 'I can't find [sex addict] in my concordance'.
Desired, EG is saying 'It isn't in your concordance. It is an inference similar to the concept of trinity which is also not in your concordance'
The inference of trinity may or may not be easier to justify and that is worthy of discussion; but neither of you is really ignoring each other.
The barbed words on both sides do NOT promote understanding.
I hope I haven't overstepped myself!
You never overstep with me MarcR
You are one of the most precious and least partial persons on this board in my opinion.
I have alot of respect for you even the way you even correct others (including here with myself)
I will take that from you anyday,
I only talked to EG once before (and actually somewhat agreeably then)
I will take the blame for being stupid enough to ask where something was in the scripture.
Because I already knew full well that he was full of it (and that it wasnt in scripture)
Its good that you said something though, alot of the men here could actually learn a little something from your attempts at seeking to be a peacemaker. Your mannerisms in doing so, and your way does not provoke, but actually felt very fatherly, and speaks well of you.
Now, that is something I have never experienced in Christ (thank you).
That was very warming actually.
God bless you MarcR, the Peace of Christ be with you