God didn't think it robbery to be equal to Himself

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

StoneThrower

Guest
Bibelehub (Strongs) says something different to BibleGateway (teknia) but BOTH of them agree that the sentence means Jesus didn't grasp for equality.


{To be on an
equality with God} (\to einai isa theoi\). Accusative articular
infinitive object of \hˆgˆsato\, "the being equal with God"
(associative instrumental case \the“i\ after \isa\). \Isa\ is
adverbial use of neuter plural with \einai\ as in Re 21:16.
{Emptied himself} (\heauton eken“se\). First aorist active
indicative of \keno“\, old verb from \kenos\, empty. Of what did
Christ empty himself? Not of his divine nature. That was
impossible. He continued to be the Son of God. There has arisen a
great controversy on this word, a \Kenosis\ doctrine. Undoubtedly
Christ gave up his environment of glory. He took upon himself
limitations of place (space) and of knowledge and of power,
though still on earth retaining more of these than any mere man.
It is here that men should show restraint and modesty, though it
is hard to believe that Jesus limited himself by error of
knowledge and certainly not by error of conduct. He was without
sin, though tempted as we are. "He stripped himself of the
insignia of majesty" (Lightfoot).
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
Or perhaps what Paul meant was that Jesus was subsisting, by the form of God, an equally valid outlook on the text, and what he emtpied from himself was haughtiness and any thinking that he could be God, which would be validated easily by the obvious instances wherein Jesus calls God in the third person and the several moments wherein Jesus says things to distinguish himself from God, like 'Why do you call me good? None are good except for God'.

That translation makes much more sense, looking at the bible from an outside standpoint and being someone not indoctrinated into trinitarian viewpoints.

All I'm saying is that it is possible to read the bible and come to different conclusions than yours.
If this was the case he did a pretty poor job at emptying Himself at being haughty or grasping at being God since He clearly received worship from others...something only due to God.
No one said that Christ was being haughty or grasping.
I guess your grasp on English comprehension isn't that good after all.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I guess your grasp on English comprehension isn't that good after all.

it is interesting that the jewish leaders tried to stone Christ numerous times for blasphemy as they understood Christ considered himself God.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
No one said anything about the Son being apart from God.
The Son being deity by imputation, as you put it, implies a time when He was not God. Or are you going to say he was eternally 'imputed' to be God. If so, you are living in a non biblical dream world.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
All you are doing is attempting to confine the full scope of the word μορφῇ into your limited definition.
Fantasy is no basis for the definition of words. My dictionary is how words are used in the Bible and, secondarily, in other ancient Greek or Hebrew texts. That's obviously not good enough for you.

It's funny how you have been pretending to translate Philippians 2:6 without expressing a single intelligent thought on the meaning of words.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0

it is interesting that the jewish leaders tried to stone Christ numerous times for blasphemy as they understood Christ considered himself God.
I also consider the Son to be God, not because of His eternal, infinite, god-like nature, but only because the Father, who is truly God, has granted His Son that privilege.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Fantasy is no basis for the definition of words. My dictionary is how words are used in the Bible and, secondarily, in other ancient Greek or Hebrew texts. That's obviously not good enough for you.

It's funny how you have been pretending to translate Philippians 2:6 without expressing a single intelligent thought on the meaning of words.
Please do not bother me any more. You simply are not worth my time.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Millerites expect the world and apostate Christians to hate them. You're going to have to try a lot harder to fulfill prophecy.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Fantasy is no basis for the definition of words. My dictionary is how words are used in the Bible and, secondarily, in other ancient Greek or Hebrew texts. That's obviously not good enough for you.

It's funny how you have been pretending to translate Philippians 2:6 without expressing a single intelligent thought on the meaning of words.
Unanswerable.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
I also consider the Son to be God, not because of His eternal, infinite, god-like nature, but only because the Father, who is truly God, has granted His Son that privilege.
What kind of God is that? Either one is eternally God or not God at all...one doesn't 'become' God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I also consider the Son to be God, not because of His eternal, infinite, god-like nature, but only because the Father, who is truly God, has granted His Son that privilege.
Then you deny Jesus own words.

Before abraham existed, I existed.

How can jesus exist before abraham unless he was God..
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
What kind of God is that? Either one is eternally God or not God at all...one doesn't 'become' God.
What kind of Christian is only declared righteous by God but isn't really?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
What kind of Christian is only declared righteous by God but isn't really?
Non,

Men claim this Not God

What Gods declairs righteous is righteous. No matter what man says