Yikes....lots of problems here!
First, "Logic" is not defined as: "private interpretation of His interpretation".
A private interpretation is a persons personal commentary of His law of faith. Private interpretations are not the law. They express the opinion of men who studies His interpretation,the very law. It is His prescribed way that we can seek His approval and not the approval of men coming from the private interpretations thereof.
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any
private interpretation.For the prophecy came not in old time by the
will of man: but holy men of God spake
as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.2Pe 1:20
Rather, "logical truths" are self-evident and necessary principles of rational thought.
It’s not what we think as to how we can rationalize according to the thoughts of another. No man does other than Christ who can see into the heart of all men.
God’s thoughts are not ours and neither are His ways ours. It’s God law according to His interpretation, the Bible. And not after the philosophies of men, through the oral traditions in respect to their own personal interpretation. .
Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you
through philosophy and vain deceit,
after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world,
and not after Christ.
For example, a proposition can not be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense.
There's no Scripture stating this fact, but it is a NECESSARY logical truth (without which, rational thought is impossible).
God's law is not a proposition its a law that must be obeyed. So then logical truth coming from whose truth ,whose logic?
You can NOT deny this fact (unless you are truly irrational...in which case you are beyond help!)
We reason according to His faith not that of our own. His word, everyone of them, is law, not theory.
But you are surely NOT irrational...you have simply not yet thought through your position.
So let's think better!
I think I have and recognize His thoughts are not ours.
And, let's NOT use a bogus definition of "logic" in an effort to refuse to answer my simple question!
I'll try again:
1. Sin is Torah-violation (Rom. 3:20; 7:7; 1 Jn. 3:4).
2. Thus, we should NOT sin (Rom. 6:15).
3. Thus, we should not violate Torah (from 1 and 2).
4. Thus, we should obey Torah (from 3).
AGAIN, which do you reject? 1? 2? 3? or 4?
I do not reject any of them. It the goal he has set before us... that no man could keep without falling. No man keeps the law perfectly without stumbling .
So then How does a Christian keep the law seeing of themselves they cannot?
If you reject 1, 2, 3, or 4, then you've rejected Scripture (and its logical consequences....no mere "private interpretation" here...)
AND, if you accept 1, 2, 3, and 4, then you MUST agree that we should obey Torah!
So which horn of this dilemma will you take?
best...
BibleGuy
Perhaps you can give us your meaning of “private interpretation”(called a heresy)?
Does it mean we are reasoning among our own self and not according to the law of God, which would help us understand why Jesus called it little faith or no faith coming through the law of faith.... God’s word?
Why did Christ call the disciples of little faith when they did reason among themselves? What was missing from their reasoning if not God’s law of faith?
Matthew 16:8 Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?