Lol what you think a Theory is? Thy video said it. It's a Hunch.
The video I link said a theory is a hunch? Please, watch it again.
It's also important to understand what a scientific theory is. Outside science, people often use the word theory to refer to a hunch or an unsupported personal opinion. This is not what the word means in science. In science, a theory refers specifically to a well substantiated explanation accounting for a body of well-substantiated facts.
-QualiaSoup
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdddbYILel0
So I will assume his Theory is an educated guess by his own words
Which you clearly misunderstood.
I watched your video and I enjoyed it and gave you my opinion where I believe the evolutionist religion is blind to the fact Darwin's theories of both Origin of Species from the Amoebanation and Descent of Man from Monkey Kind are today verifiably laid to rest and done with.
Actually, science has verified Darwin's position. The only people who disagree with Darwin are creationists.
Darwin's Theory is a religion, and Theory, a theology.
Darwin's theory is not a hunch, it's not theology, and it's not religion.
I already explained what a theory actually is.
Theology deals with the concept of God or gods. The theory of evolution does
not deal with the concept of God or gods.
And evolution is
not a religion. It isn't something that is worshiped. That's like calling Germ Theory a religion.
The rest of your paragraph is pure nonsense, because you treat evolution as if it's a religion. You have this incredibly false idea that Darwin is some sort of Darwinian prophet. That's pure, total, bogus.
You are completely ignorant of what the theory of evolution is. What you know about evolution is completely wrong. I'm not just saying you rebuttals are wrong, but your basic understanding of what evolution is - is entirely false.
It is true Darwinist Evolution is possible Eugenically. But it proves its not the origin of species, its the dead end of genetics. Horse Kind is Horse Kind and Donkey Kind is Donkey Kind. Cross em, Mule Kind. Kind Hybrid.
Evolution does not support eugenics. Eugenics is the practice of wiping out a species because it's "inferior". However, this is not based off the theory of evolution. It is based off of a misunderstanding of evolution as well as BASELESS racism.
You then explain that we have "kinds" of animals. But you can't define what a kind is.
You accept micro-evolution. Yet, you don't even understand how micro-evolution works.
You then go on to explain the different kinds of humans. However, this doesn't explain what a kind is. More importantly, you keep using kind in a meta sense. You have human kind, but then you have Shemite kind. What's next? Woman kind? Baby Kind after that? In every day language, kind generally refers to a group of people with a shared trait. It's too vague of a term to simply use it scientifically unless you define what a "kind" refers to.
It's like saying, "Well, we have dog kind. We also have wolf kind, poodle kind, and dalmatian kind." But, you could argue, we have "animal kind" and "plant kind".
Scientists don't refer to animals as "kinds" because the term is completely useless. Instead, scientists use the following: species, genus, family, order, class, and phylum.
If anyone asks if you accept the theory of evolution, just tell them you don't understand evolution, and that you're a creationist because the creationist explanation makes sense to you. Because you clearly don't understand what evolution is, what a scientific theory is, or what the general consensus among scientists is.