V
Re: I am ignoring those who just insult & I am only repling to those who offer Script
I wouldn't classify that sentence as very productive of inducing peaceful discussion, would you?
Clarke, I believe, fails to consider the proper exegesis of the Scriptures. He was an Arminian, so that isn't surprising that he sees the passage as literal when the language shows that it is not. He is the only one who comments in this fashion, by the way, out of literally dozens of commentary authors.
That's all well and fine, but it doesn't answer to the issue that prompted my initial responses, when you said "Jesus said 'I didn't come to being peace, but a sword,' " which replied to my admonishment to you that you were not contributing to the the overall attitude we are trying to achieve on the forum. You used the phrase to justify continuing to browbeat others, which I believe you do more than you may realize.
This also is off point, as it addresses the eschatology without addressing the issue between us that prompted my post.
Your post implied blessing, as I read it. If I was wrong, please forgive me.
I think this is an argument that goes around the barn to answer a question that wasn't really asked.
I truly fail to understand how you can legitimately state there is any parallel between Jacob's lie and our putting on the image of Christ. The thought is anathema to Christian teaching.
By believing such you demonstrate your own lack of understanding of scripture.
Adam Clarke explains it in more depth than I have words for.
Read his commentary. It is accurate on this subject.
Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary - Hebrews 6
Read his commentary. It is accurate on this subject.
Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary - Hebrews 6
No. We are to conform to the image of the Son (Romans 8:29). Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin; (1 Peter 4:1). He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked. (1 John 2:6)
I believe we are the eagles or the fowl that will eat the flesh of kings and the flesh of captains (Which is mentioned in Revelation and in the Old Testament). Granted, now that does not mean I believe we will be cannibals mind you, but I do believe Christ will destroy all nations that come up against Him with the sword that proceeds from out of his mouth. How the saint gains victory after the enemies of God are incapacited by the Lord is a mystery at this time to me. But I do know a lot about the timing of the events of Revelation and the Olivet discouse, though (if you are interested).
First, nowhere did I ever say that God blessed Jacob because he lied. You are putting those words into my mouth (when I did not say such a thing). Lying according to the 10 Commandments is wrong.
Second, I am familar with the story of Jacob and Esau and I am more than aware that his father was blind. What I meant by the word "appearance" is that Jacob took on the appearance (not visibly but in a form of identity) that he was Esau. The word appearance is defined as: "the act or fact of appearing, as to the eye or mind or before the public:"
So Jacob appeared to be Esau to his father Isaac so as to convince him mentally by tricking him with the other senses.
So Jacob appeared to be Esau to his father Isaac so as to convince him mentally by tricking him with the other senses.
Third, the parallel between Jacob taking on Esau's identity so as to obtain the firstborn blessing from his father Isaac is a parallel of how we as believers are to take on the the identity of the Son so as to obtain the firstborn blessing from God the Father. It is only if we conform to the image of the Son whereby God the Father will passover us. God is not condoning the sin of "lying" in this "type of Christ", but he is merely showing that Jacob was a "Type of Christ" loosely in the fact that Jesus who knew no sin was made to be sin for us.
Why does Christ have to impute His righteousness to us first? Because the slate needs to be wiped clean of sin and we need to be born again and renewed both in our hearts and minds. It is the starting point of a new relationship and beginning with God. But if one sins again, then they will end up just like Adam and Eve did when they ate of the tree (Which caused sin and death to come into the world). Believers have confess and forsake sin and they have to let Christ do the "good work" in their lives. This is not our work, but Christ working in us. It is His righteousness.
[/QUOTE]Ephesians 4:17-27 is a most accurate quote to reflect biblical teaching that we have a choice now in living in death, or life, a choice that when we were "yet sinners" we did not have available to us. No where does God say that the "old man" has been regenerated. He says we are "a new creation," a creation that abhors sin and will not walk in it. But death still lives in us, in the flesh, and we can -- as Paul repeatedly hits upon on Galatians, can walk in the flesh, or in the Spirit. It is the new creation who is able to resist temptation. The old dead man simply acts like death acts, the way the spiritually dead around us still act without choice. The flesh is condemned. The new creation is alive in Christ.