Dan_473 said:
if humans are not morally responsible for their actions, then saying something is wrong is really saying one has a feeling about something.
but let's go with that.
When two organisms are competing, whether it's two lions fighting for control of the pride or two humans fighting for control of oil, the organism with the superior genes, more survivable, is more likely to win.
I think that's how natural selection works, and how species evolve.
but let's go with that.
When two organisms are competing, whether it's two lions fighting for control of the pride or two humans fighting for control of oil, the organism with the superior genes, more survivable, is more likely to win.
I think that's how natural selection works, and how species evolve.
Yes that is accurate.
But the lion will always be a lion. And the zebra will always be a zebra.
The zebra does not change its properties to become a lion. All the zebra can do is outrun the lion or remain in large packs so that the lion does not come after the zebra.
Seems to me that in evolution the zebra would change into something that would prey on the lion.
There is change within species, but one species does not "evolve" into another completely different species.