you say here some bits are 'more enlightened'
clear implication: some are 'unenlightened'
similarly you say there's an 'evolution in the understanding' of the people who wrote the things in the Bible.
clear implication: looking back, the earlier writers are devolved
here you unambiguously say that not only does Moses ((who wrote down Genesis)) lack understanding, but that you have greater understanding.
this statement is factually incorrect, but more importantly for the purposes of the reply you wanted, you point out here that you do not believe the Bible is inerrant.
clear implication: you believe some of it is wrong.
clear implication: you consider yourself able to identify at least some of the wrong parts as wrong.
put all these things together:
Moses wrote down the first five books.
you in particular believe the first 5 books are written by a devolved, unenlightened man who lacked understanding and included much erroneous information.
you believe you know better, are more enlightened, have better understanding, and are more evolved.
you are saying Moses was an unevolved, unenlightened, confused & intellectually dim man who believed a pack of lies.
you're calling Moses an idiot because he wrote the first 5 books of the Bible, which you consider largely idiotic in content.
you believe the Bible was written by idiots.
clear implication: some are 'unenlightened'
similarly you say there's an 'evolution in the understanding' of the people who wrote the things in the Bible.
clear implication: looking back, the earlier writers are devolved
here you unambiguously say that not only does Moses ((who wrote down Genesis)) lack understanding, but that you have greater understanding.
this statement is factually incorrect, but more importantly for the purposes of the reply you wanted, you point out here that you do not believe the Bible is inerrant.
clear implication: you believe some of it is wrong.
clear implication: you consider yourself able to identify at least some of the wrong parts as wrong.
put all these things together:
Moses wrote down the first five books.
you in particular believe the first 5 books are written by a devolved, unenlightened man who lacked understanding and included much erroneous information.
you believe you know better, are more enlightened, have better understanding, and are more evolved.
you are saying Moses was an unevolved, unenlightened, confused & intellectually dim man who believed a pack of lies.
you're calling Moses an idiot because he wrote the first 5 books of the Bible, which you consider largely idiotic in content.
you believe the Bible was written by idiots.
Hmmm I don't remember saying that. Perhaps you could quote me?