Is the old testament laws still use today?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#61
so does "underlying spiritual principles" mean pick and choose what you like? and how does one get this divine discernment? i only have earthly free will, i have to make my own discernment and pray for the best. sometimes i wish i could give up my free will and let the Lord make all my decisions for me it would be much easier but then i would be learning nothing.

i think i may agree with the animal sacrifice but im really not an expert on it.
It's a moot point. . .all the "spiritual" aspects of the Mosaic regulations are ours in Christ.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#62
I don't believe that Sparkman, or anyone else will argue that the OT has "NO PURPOSE".

The Law was originally given to Israel as a guideline for successful living.
Was it not given as the conditions of the Mosaic Covenant, the violation of which conditions was condemnation?

Rabbinic tradition attempted to change the Law into a pathway to righteousness; which it was NEVER intended to be.


The historical books give us insights into which attitudes are pleasing to the Father; and which attitudes lead us away from fellowship with God


The Psalms and Proverbs instruct us in specific principles in living a life which is pleasing to God; and avoiding things which anger Him.

The books of Prophesy record God's attempts to help Israel avoid chastisement. They also help us understand how to minimize or avoid chastisement. Prophesy also gives us insight into what lies ahead and how to deal with it.

What, IMO, Sparkman is trying to say is that the Law IS NOT and NEVER WAS a pathway to righteousness.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#63
I agree and will add to your comment......
Then why not study the spiritual aspects of the law and take it to heart via the Holy Spirit given to us?
All the "spiritual" aspects of the Mosaic regulations are ours in Christ.
 
Dec 19, 2009
27,513
128
0
71
#64
So,I was reading the old testament and got me thinking do we still have to obey the old testaments laws?
That's a difficult question to answer, I think. There are a whole lot of things the Lord commanded Israel to do that we Christians do not do. Still, the Ten Commandments certainly hold true today, and there is a lot to be learned about justice by reading the Old Testament.
 
Dec 9, 2011
14,023
1,777
113
#65
So,I was reading the old testament and got me thinking do we still have to obey the old testaments laws?
The only way man can relate with GOD is to be perfect so if you are going to keep the law you would have to keep it perfectly.

And because you are trying to keep the law/10 commandments will not be acceptable if you are not perfect.Only JESUS/the WORD of GOD who was on earth in the flesh fulfilled all the law.

We are not under law anymore if we were,we would not be able to keep it because of the weakness of the flesh.

Now We are under Grace
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#66
Here is a page that may interest you: Ceremonial Law And Moral Law"
The Scriptures never divide the laws given at Sinai into categories; the Law is a comprehensive unit.

As for those in Christ, we have died to the Law (all of it):


4 Likewise, my brothers, you also have died to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, to him who has been raised from the dead, in order that we may bear fruit for God. 5 For while we were living in the flesh, our sinful passions, aroused by the law, were at work in our members to bear fruit for death. 6 But now we are released from the law, having died to that which held us captive, so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code. (from Rom. 7)

You can read more about the believer's relationship to the Law here:




-JGIG
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#67
That scripture is very easy to misunderstand.
Verse 15 as you highlighted that customs/ordinances/regulations (namusa) were traditions of the Pharisees, not of Torah/Law itself.

Ephesians 2:15, "namusa" (Aramaic) in context can only mean, TRADITION, as defined "commandments of men", which may be an attempt at "extending the use" of a "Written TORAH commandment", but lack the "Spirit of TORAH". Instead of "setting free", they "lead to bondage", unjust practices, and are burdensome, when applied in certain cases, such as is mentioned in Ephesians 2:15, and elaborated upon, by Yahshua, in Matthew Chapter 23.

contained in "Ordinances" = 1379 (Greek). dogmatizo dog-mat-id'-zo from 1378; to prescribe by statute, i.e. (reflexively) to submit to, ceremonially rule:--be subject to ordinances.

This is where we get the word "dogmatic" meaning '
inclined to lay down principles that are not able to be denied or disputed to be true.'
just-me, are you using the commentary from the AENT or other Aramaic version of the NT? Several leaps are made to arrive at the deduction that 'ordinances' refer to man-made rules. The AENT, in particular, is wrought with error in its commentary (the work of one self-proclaimed 'expert' in Aramaic, btw, and not the work of a team of linguists), mirroring the heretical theology taught at this site. Indeed the editor of the AENT is the primary author of that site and the author of the AENT is a contributing author at the site.


Are there not ordinances in Torah Law?


There is no "Spirit of Torah."

Do a search of the Scriptures.

It is not there.

Your intentional use of a capital 's' there indicates deity.
Do you believe that Torah is God?

One chooses to either be led by the letter of the Law or by the Spirit of God; that is the choice.

It is never a mixture.

Indeed, Galatians 5:18 clearly says, "If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the Law."

-JGIG
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#69
Jesus sure spent a lot of time teaching from the Hebrew bible. why would he do all that if those books have no purpose today?
All Scripture is useful for teaching.

The Hebrew Scriptures' purpose is to point to Christ.

Lots of teaching in the Hebrew Scriptures are not Law-centered, but point to a New Covenant, in which God forgives all of our transgressions and chooses to remember them no more; chooses to not hold our sins against us. Passages that prophesy that the Messiah would be the Light unto the nations and that all would find freedom in Him. Those things are confirmed and stated clearly in the New Covenant Scriptures (those written to believers after the Cross).

Once one is in Christ and goes back and reads the OT, if they're focused on the Work of Christ, what He accomplished, and who they are in Him, they can see Him everywhere! It's like reading a mystery, getting to the end to find out the solution and going back and re-reading the mystery with all the answers - you see it all in a completely different light and pick up on things that didn't occur to you because now you know how it ultimately turns out :).

Too many believers read the Book without wearing the lenses of the Finished Work of Christ.

-JGIG
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#71
The only laws we have to obey from the Old Testament are moral laws,laws of love,but those laws are always in effect no matter what period of time in history,and can never pass away,which the Bible says,love works no ill towards their neighbor,therefore love is the fulfilling of the law,and the 2 greatest commandments are love God and people.

But the physical ordinances of Israel,Jesus took them out of the way nailing them to His cross,because they were contrary to us,which means they could not offer any spiritual impact on us,which is the only true way you can have a relationship with God that is everlasting,therefore let no man judge you in meats,or drinks,or new moons,or respect of a holy day,or of the sabbath days,which means they cannot tell you to keep them.

If you love people perfectly then you have fulfilled God's law,and you can only do that by the Spirit,and if led by the Spirit you will be spiritually right with God.
 
Jun 6, 2015
171
0
0
#72

Gen 9:3
3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
KJV

1 Tim 4:1-5
Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
5 For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
KJV


I view the Dietary Laws of Lev chapter 11 and Deu chapter 14 as a parentheses between Gen 9:3 and 1Tim 4:4.

I believe that their intent was simply a visible distinction between the nation of Israel and the surrounding people.

With all the food fads in modern society, they no longer even do that!
The intent of the food laws are to keep us healthy, Gen.9 was before God gave food laws to Moses, 1 Tim.4:3, to abstain from meats that God has created to be received, pig's were not created to be received, they are scavengers, they will make you sick. God bless
 
K

KennethC

Guest
#73
The intent of the food laws are to keep us healthy, Gen.9 was before God gave food laws to Moses, 1 Tim.4:3, to abstain from meats that God has created to be received, pig's were not created to be received, they are scavengers, they will make you sick. God bless
That is a misreading of 1 Timothy 4:3 if you are trying to place pork as still unable to be eaten.
The bible makes it clear in the NT in a few places that all food has been made clean now and is to be received with thanksgiving.
The only restrictions the NT gives on food now is not to eat if it causes another to stumble or if you know it was offered to idols. Those two restrictions are all there is now when it comes to food !!!
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#74
The intent of the food laws are to keep us healthy, Gen.9 was before God gave food laws to Moses, 1 Tim.4:3, to abstain from meats that God has created to be received, pig's were not created to be received, they are scavengers, they will make you sick. God bless
That is a misreading of 1 Timothy 4:3 if you are trying to place pork as still unable to be eaten.
The bible makes it clear in the NT in a few places that all food has been made clean now and is to be received with thanksgiving.
The only restrictions the NT gives on food now is not to eat if it causes another to stumble or if you know it was offered to idols. Those two restrictions are all there is now when it comes to food !!!
I think both of you are missing the spiritual intent of the scriptures in this respect. Peter had a vision of all manner of animals that God had made clean, and then was called to Cornelius' place who was a Gentile. The unclean meats, even in the Old testament, represent non-Israelite heritage that offered unclean animals in pagan sacrifices, mainly pigs (John 3:16)

That's the "mystery" of the Gospel. Peter didn't go to Cornelius' place to eat bacon. He went there to reveal that Gentiles were not excluded from the Kingdom of God.
 
Last edited:
K

KennethC

Guest
#75
I think both of you are missing the spiritual intent of the scriptures in this respect. Peter had a vision of all manner of animals that God had made clean, and then was called to Cornelius' place who was a Gentile. The unclean meats, even in the Old testament, represent non-Israelite heritage that offered unclean animals in pagan sacrifices, mainly pigs (John 3:16)

That's the "mystery" of the Gospel. Peter didn't go to Cornelius' place to eat bacon. He went there to reveal that Gentiles were not excluded from the Kingdom of God.

No not missing the spiritual aspect at all, but we can not take that passage from Acts and just say it refers only to Gentiles.

The reason being is because that is not the only place the NT says that we can eat whatever we want now, and we are not to hold it against another if they do eat or if they don't eat.

Romans 14:2 says those who believe can eat all things...........

1 Corinthians 10:25-31 says to eat whatever is sold at the market or whatever is served when you go to an unbelievers house and not to refuse nothing unless you know it was offered to idols........

1 Corinthians 8:8-9 says that what we eat does not commend us to God, but only if it causes another to stumble are we not to use the liberty we are given to eat all things to do it in front of them............

Hebrews 13:9 says that we are to be established by grace and not be caught up in strange doctrines about food that does not profit for what a person eats does not matter before God when it comes to salvation......


We are not to go around judging of forcing others to follow the food ordinances of the OT, nor are those who don't follow those ordinances to force not keeping them on others. For neither way gets one salvation, but if one thinks by keeping them they get salvation then they are seeking their justification by the law and not by Christ which is wrong.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#76
I think both of you are missing the spiritual intent of the scriptures in this respect.
But "spiritual" intent is not the point, the point is actual observance of the law.
The intent of the Scriptures on that point has not been missed, but clearly established from the NT word of God.
 
S

sparkman

Guest
#77
Listen to Christ not man, Matt.5:18, Jesus said not one dot of Mosses law as changed, not even the food laws, the only thing changed are the blood ordinance, you no longer sacrifice animals, and Christ is now our Passover. God bless
Jesus Christ and Paul would disagree with you.

Mark 7: 14And he called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand: 15There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.”[SUP]e[/SUP] 17And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. 18And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, 19since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?”[SUP]f[/SUP] (Thus he declared all foods clean.) 20And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. 21For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, 22coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. 23All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

Romans 14: 14I am convinced, being fully persuaded in the Lord Jesus, that nothing is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for that person it is unclean. 15If your brother or sister is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy someone for whom Christ died. 16Therefore do not let what you know is good be spoken of as evil. 17For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit,


The clean/unclean laws were part of the Old Covenant that separated Israelites from Gentiles, along with the Sabbath, holy days, physical circumcision, and other ceremonial and ritualistic elements of the Old Covenant.

Ephesians 2: 14For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility 15by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, 16and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility

Some continue to attempt to erect this wall again and to throw rocks at those who don't observe them, calling them "false Christians", "so-called Christians" and accuse them of following a fake Christianity.

Unfortunately I was part of such an organization, although they repented. Thank God for deliverance from foolishness.

Concerning Matthew 5:17-19 I have already covered that here:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/115415-matthew-5-17-19-sabbathkeeping-claims.html
 
Last edited:
S

sparkman

Guest
#78
I think both of you are missing the spiritual intent of the scriptures in this respect. Peter had a vision of all manner of animals that God had made clean, and then was called to Cornelius' place who was a Gentile. The unclean meats, even in the Old testament, represent non-Israelite heritage that offered unclean animals in pagan sacrifices, mainly pigs (John 3:16)

That's the "mystery" of the Gospel. Peter didn't go to Cornelius' place to eat bacon. He went there to reveal that Gentiles were not excluded from the Kingdom of God.
I would agree that is the point of the vision, however other passages cover this subject including the ones I mentioned above.

This reminds me of an account a pastor in my former fellowship told about. Some teenagers in the church were talking about getting drunk and ordering pizza. The pizza came and it had pepperonis on it...the teenagers self righteously yelled at the delivery guy about bringing them pizza with unclean meats. The irony is obvious..engaged in drunkenness and being so indignant about pork on their pizza.

This is the mentality of some who claim these laws apply, such as a young man who keeps forming new usernames to come in here and call non-Torah observers "false Christians"..he uses bogus information on his details while proclaiming to love the Sabbath. He violates a very apparent moral absolute such as lying in order to judge others who don't observe the Sabbath.
 
S

sparkman

Guest
#79
That is a misreading of 1 Timothy 4:3 if you are trying to place pork as still unable to be eaten.
The bible makes it clear in the NT in a few places that all food has been made clean now and is to be received with thanksgiving.
The only restrictions the NT gives on food now is not to eat if it causes another to stumble or if you know it was offered to idols. Those two restrictions are all there is now when it comes to food !!!
Yes..I saw an example of this in my fellowship after they started teaching that the clean/unclean meat laws don't apply. Some lady brought a dish with pork in it to a potluck dinner. She put a label on it saying there was pork in the dish...I guess so that those who had a sensitivity wouldn't eat it..but that caused some to get upset who thought the clean/unclean laws still applied. It was way too soon after the church reforms to be doing that, and it offended at least one family who still had sensitivities. She really shouldn't have made it.
 
S

sparkman

Guest
#80
The intent of the food laws are to keep us healthy, Gen.9 was before God gave food laws to Moses, 1 Tim.4:3, to abstain from meats that God has created to be received, pig's were not created to be received, they are scavengers, they will make you sick. God bless
Chickens eat pretty much the same food a pig will eat.

There may be some health value in avoiding pork, but it's not a moral issue. The group I belonged to put it on the level of moral issues, which is entirely wrong. Churches or Christians shouldn't be in the business of dispensing dietary advice.